Megan Mitchel has never worked as a clinical psychologist nor a children psychologist nor has justice system experience. However, she has been appointed to present children of Australia, without having capacity or knowledge for doing so without relying on legitimate and wide range of researches, which she obviously is not using. Her social work experience doesn't give her the experience she requires to make what she claimed to the Parliamentary enquiry, which is she is psychologist by trade. Megan believes that children alienation does not exist, which is an obvious fact to me and many members of the public, few listed and support this application. Also, there are numerous studies discussing significant short / long term effects on children removed from parent(s) and his side of family, which happens routinely in the Family courts. We believe Megan's statement and experience demonstrates that she is not fit for representing the children.