BREXIT VIOLATES MY HUMAN RIGHTS. IT DENIES MY ACCESS TO LAW AND THE PROTECTION OF LAW; AND IT ALSO DENIES MY RIGHT OF ACCESS TO A TRUE DEMOCRACY.

This petition requires the Justices of the SUPREME COURT to examine and test for legal validity; all the breaches and violations of Human Rights; as set out below.

Furthermore; this petition also requires THERESA MAY; as the Prime Minister; to provide the right of ‘access to law’ and this SUPREME COURT; in order that  such violations of HUMAN RIGHTS can be submitted to this court; for test and examination of the legality thereof; thereby, carrying out her duty and, complying with her obligations as determined by the current EU TREATY; which Great Britain agreed to and signed.

Britain has not yet left the EU. Until it actually does leave the EU; this obligation upon the Prime Minister; as determined by law; still remains in force.

The, violations; and, the remedy required,

1.    Test and examine FOR LEGAL VALIDITY the ruling of the JUDICIARY that “Article 9” of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” is, ABSOLUTE?

Contention,

“Article 9” of the “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689” is not ‘ABSOLUTE’ at all. It is only and merely ‘conditional’. The, ‘conditions’ as determined by the ‘peoples protection’ set out within that ‘Bill’ by, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” - This paragraph, within that ‘Bill’, specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ any or all of the “PREMISES” of the ‘Bill’; but, only on the ‘conditions’ as determined by, “The Said Rights Claimed” - This determines, that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

The, “POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS” In Parliament do “Prejudice the People” - When they instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must vote; this overrules and supplants the ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituent.

Thus, the POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS in Parliament have no ‘legality’ at all.

2.    The, SUPREME COURT, must also test and examine, for the ‘legal validity’; the, “TRIGGERING OF “ARTICLE 50” in the “EU (WITHDRAWAL) BILL” that was

 passed in Parliament under a “WHIPPED VOTE”.

Contention,

As has already been established above, the “POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS” in Parliament has no ‘legality’; therefore a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament has no ‘legality’ whatsoever.

In which case the “SUPREME COURT” Justices must rule that the “TRIGGERING OF ARTICLE 50” by a “WHIPPED VOTE” in parliament; has no legality at all.

The, SUPREME COURT, must uphold that, MY HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED. That, if the U.K. still wants to LEAVE THE EU; then the U.K. must mount another referendum. Because the present referendum procedure process presented to Parliament, has been corrupt.

ALL SIGNING THIS PETITION DEMAND THAT THE SUPREME COURT MUST EXAMINE AND RULE ON THE ‘TRUE LEGALITY’ OF,

The Political Party Whips In Parliament.
The ‘Triggering of Article 50” by a ‘Whipped  Vote’ in Parliament.
The actual “Ballot Paper” used in the Referendum of 2016.

Signature_________________________

 

Name_____________________________

 

Address____________________________

 

___________________________________