I am calling upon the Los Angeles Police Department to fully investigate Cash Elroy Jones, professionally known as “Wack100,” for attempted extortion, threats involving intimate material, and related conduct, and—if investigators determine that probable cause exists—to seek his arrest and appropriate criminal charges. The reason he has attempted to extort me is for power, control and the maintaining of his false narratives on the internet for years. Most recently, his attempted extortion is directly tied to my coverage of The Lil Durk Trial and the fear of my potentional within the Hip Hop Community. 

This request is not based merely on an online disagreement.

On September 15, 2026, I submitted a written complaint to the LAPD Van Nuys Community Police Station concerning Jones's threats, his statements regarding sexually explicit material purportedly depicting me, and what I contend was the subsequent unauthorized transmission of that material to others, including Adam John Grandmaison, professionally known as Adam22. 

THE THREATS
I reported to law enforcement that since as early as April 2023 up until September 6th, 2026 during private telephone conversations, and in person on January 2nd, 2026. Jones has repeatedly told me, in substance, that if I became a major public figure, Hollywood celebrity, or successful social-media influencer, sexually explicit material purportedly depicting me would be released to damage my career and reputation.

I further reported that these statements occurred within what I describe as a broader effort to pressure me to comply with his demands and online narratives. According to my complaint, when I resisted, Jones threatened retaliation involving both intimate material and mass reporting of my social-media platforms—platforms that form part of my business and income.

THE TEXT MESSAGES
The evidence submitted to police includes screenshots of communications from a contact I identify as Jones. According to those messages, Jones stated that “31” women possessed a video and were preparing a “mass blast” to my community, while allegedly following people I follow so the material would reach my audience.

When I asked whether the intention was to destroy me, the response included:

“keep talking i’ll take your channel the same way I took ya last one”
The same exchange included the assertion:

“we’re already tapped into your revenue”
These statements are reproduced and described in the police complaint.

The screenshots attached to that complaint further document these exchanges on pages 9–13.

THE PUBLIC NO JUMPER STATEMENTS
The complaint also describes a recorded public discussion involving Jones and Adam Grandmaison, professionally known as Adam22.

During that conversation, Jones discussed sexually explicit material purportedly depicting me and stated:

“They got the videos.”
Jones then said:

“They will send you the videos.”
And later:

“I'm going have him get you the videos, bro. No lie.”
Adam22 responded:

“I would love that. I would love to have that on my phone.”
Those statements and their context are documented in the complaint submitted to LAPD.

I maintain that I never authorized Jones, Adam22, No Jumper, or anyone acting on their behalf to distribute sexually explicit material depicting me.

WHY WACK100'S OWN PUBLIC COMMENTS DESERVE SCRUTINY
There is another reason I believe law enforcement should take these allegations seriously.

In the video discussed above, Jones speaks about the federal case involving Big U and recounts his own participation in a past encounter involving rapper Future at LAX.

Jones says Big U stayed behind while he personally followed Future. Jones says he caught up with Future, received a telephone from him, and spoke with someone who acknowledged a debt and said it would be resolved.

Jones disputes allegations that Future was assaulted and presents his conduct as debt collection rather than extortion.

That episode is separate from my allegations and does not itself establish that Jones committed attempted extortion against me. I am including it because Jones's own public discussion provides additional context that investigators can independently evaluate when determining whether there is a broader evidentiary pattern relevant to motive, intent, knowledge, or credibility.

THIS IS ABOUT EVIDENCE, NOT INTERNET DRAMA
My complaint asks investigators to examine whether Jones's use of threatened exposure, reputational destruction, intimate material, and economic interference was intended to compel compliance, obtain leverage, interfere with legally protected rights, or obtain some other benefit. The complaint also asks investigators to determine who possessed the intimate material, where it originated, how it was obtained, and to whom it was transmitted. 

It requests preservation of texts, direct messages, emails, cloud records, metadata, deleted files, social-media communications and communications between Jones, Adam22, No Jumper personnel and other potentially involved individuals.

The communications should be investigated under Penal Code § 524 as potential attempted extortion because the threatened consequence need not be evaluated solely from isolated words. The communications should be considered together with their surrounding circumstances, including threatened dissemination of intimate material, statements concerning coordinated distribution to my audience, the statement “keep talking i'll take your channel,” threats affecting my revenue, prior telephone communications, and subsequent statements concerning obtaining and transmitting the material. I request investigators determine whether these circumstances establish a specific intent to use fear to compel my compliance or restraint and whether the communications and subsequent actions constituted a direct step toward accomplishing that objective.

WHAT THIS PETITION DEMANDS
We respectfully call upon the Los Angeles Police Department and appropriate prosecuting authorities to:

1. Conduct a complete investigation into the allegations and evidence submitted concerning Cash “Wack100” Jones;
2. Preserve and obtain relevant electronic communications and digital evidence through lawful investigative processes; 
3. Investigate the alleged threatened mass distribution of intimate material and alleged interference with social-media accounts and revenue; 
4. Determine whether the communications and conduct satisfy the elements of attempted extortion, extortion, unlawful distribution of intimate imagery, criminal threats, conspiracy, or any other applicable offense; and
5. If the evidence establishes probable cause, seek Jones's arrest and submit the matter for prosecution.

This is not a request for social-media punishment or trial by public opinion.

It is a request for law enforcement to examine the evidence, apply California law, and take appropriate action if the legal standard for arrest and prosecution is met.

SIGN THIS PETITION if you believe threats involving intimate material, professional destruction, economic retaliation, or social-media influence should be investigated based on the evidence—regardless of how famous or influential the person accused may be.
 

Wack100’s Public Statements About Future & Big U
In the VladTV interview, Cash “Wack100” Jones places himself directly inside the Future/Big U debt incident, stating that Big U stayed behind while he personally followed Future through LAX and spoke with someone on Future’s phone who acknowledged an outstanding debt. Wack denies Future was assaulted, but his own account confirms his participation in pursuing Future over the alleged debt.

This is relevant to my complaint because I contend Jones has used similar intimidation and economic pressure against me, including threats to “take your channel,” claims that “we’re already tapped into your revenue,” and discussion of a planned “mass blast” of purported intimate material.  I also request investigators examine whether Jones has used similar coercive or exposure tactics against other celebrities and personalities through Clubhouse.