Stop and read this:
That is literally a shameful practice in the state of Oklahoma how a man's life is in still in prison who is wrongfully convicted because of 7 extra sheets of paper on a post-conviction. What type of hellish justice is this in Oklahoma to the victims of injustice?
Order Granting State's Motion to Strike Petitioners's Application for Post Conviction Relief
Now on this day,the State's Motion to strike Petitioners's Pleading comes before the undersigned Judge of the District Court. This Court finds that the Petitioners's Application for a Post Conviction Relief does not comply with the Rules of the District Court,Seven Judicial District. Petitioners's Application as it comprises of twenty- seven (27) pages. The Petitioner was not granted prior permission to exceed the reasonable page limitation set forth by Rule 37(B), Officially Court Rules of the Seventh Judicial and Twenty - Sixth Administrative District (2018).
The Court, therefore,finds that the State motion should be granted. The Court orders the Clerk of the District Court to strike Petitioners's Application for Post Conviction Relief and all accompanying documents from the record.
Although, this is not the whole story and the fallacy of our Judicial system in Oklahoma.
Facts:
The State requested 2 extension both times there were no mention towards any objections the length of the post convictions. Therefore, instead of addressing these significant constitutional violations, the Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office seeks to strike the brief raising the issues on procedural grounds
However,Rule 4(e) of the Rule for District Courts requires an opposing party be given time to respond. That rules states, Any party opposing motion, expect those enumerated in section c above, shall serve and a brief or a list of authorities in opposition within fifteen (15) days after service of the motion, or the motion may be deemed confessed. The rule is written in mandatory terms suggestions that it is inappropriate for the Court to rule on a motion filed by the District Attorney's Office before Petitioner has had time to respond. The Court's order in the matter was issued (4) days after the motion was filed. Counsel for Petitioner did not receive a copy of the State's motion until July 8, 2025 and no other notice was given about the filing of the motion. Counsel for Petitioner did not receive a copy of the Court's order until July 10th but except to have the 15 days under Rule 4 to file a response and ask for as hearing on the matter
Petitioner submit that the local court rule cannot be used in way that prohibits a post conviction applicant from fully exhausting all claims and presenting all necessary facts to support those claims.
Therefore, Vicki loves fight for her own family, but not the the families of injustice in Oklahoma
#freejoshuachriston