The Federal Labour Arbitration Courts in Canada have ruled previously that Employee Travel is a benefit and that the Company can not act in an arbitrary fashion void of other guiding principles, by administrating uneven policies which discriminate and disadvantage against one member to the advantage and favour of others in the various employee groups. Ref: Whitlow/CAW, counsel Greg Spencer vs. AC, counsel Guy Delisle, heard before Judge-Arbitrator Harvey Frumkin in LAC 11/JUL/1994 for decision/award rendered 25/AUG/1994 in favour of grievance lodged 21/JUL/1993, at CAW District 301, Local 2213 by then DC/Joe Dennie. You will see the repeated reference of a company travel benefit (not perk or privilege) which is reiterated on the AC website, under Benefits, that we enjoy as employees and members represented by a trade union governed by a negotiated collective agreement contract. JA/Frumkin remained seized on the matter. The Company was so shocked that they had lost and upset that they would lose control, they immediately applied to the Federal Ontario Superior Appellate Court for Judicial Review which was denied because there was no error in law to be found. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/cala/