Here is the response being received by those who wrote to Kirk.Slusher@dot.ohio.gov. Copies were also sent to mehaffiej, blackburnj, Matthew.Rosebr. Dear Mr. E–––––: Thank you for providing input into the safety of the Main St./College Ave. intersection in Bluffton. Since Ohio is considered a “Home Rule” state, the village of Bluffton administration has jurisdiction over any improvements on all roads within the village corporation limits, including state routes. ODOT has been and will continue to assist the village at their request in developing alternatives to improve safety and traffic flow through the intersection. However, ultimately it is the village of Bluffton’s responsibility to enact any measures. The village administrator is being copied on this response. There seems to be a belief that ODOT removed the signal back in 2009 which is not true. Back then, the village of Bluffton applied for and received federal funds to enhance the downtown transportation system. When utilizing federal funds, the recipient of the funds must make sure that transportation elements comply with current standards. The village hired an engineering consultant to assure that all transportation elements met current standards including signal warrants. Established signal warrants are documented in the Ohio Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (OMUTCD). The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) 4511.11 gives the OMUTCD its authority. Signal warrants are a set of established criteria used to determine when it is acceptable to erect a signal. A majority of the warrants are based upon the number of vehicles entering the intersection during certain periods of time. There are also warrants established for pedestrian usage as well. The village’s consultant found that the Main/College intersection did meet any of the established warrants. ODOT agreed with the consultant recommendations. ODOT does not set the rules for signal warrants, we simply assure that local governments comply with the rules ODOT certainly understands the concerns that residents have voiced over the intersection and continue to work with the village to find an acceptable and legal solution. Ultimately the village administration will make the decision of what the best course of action is. Sincerely, Kirk Slusher D1 Deputy Director