Actualización de la petición#Supremecourt ORDER PASSED BY FRAUD BEING NULLITY/NONEST IN EYES OF LAW,MUST B RECALLED

SUPREME COURT JUDGES ABUSE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY MALICIOUSLY 2DELAY &SUPPORT CRIMINALS

Prakash YadavPune, India
3 ago 2026

it's a simple case u/MSMED Act a special enactment for speedy disposal of disputes on delayed payment to promote public policy of India to protect survival of MSEs due to delayed payment by mighty buyers by dilatory tactics. (1) it is undisputed that Petitioner has provided services without complaint for 129 months in interest of Bank of India as per orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Pune, but Bank has not paid services of 123 months by playing dilatory tactics to delay and frustrate payment beyond capacity of Petitioner to survive in absence of Income. (2) an award dated 12.9.12 is passed in favor of Petitioner on 12.9.12 in Petition 28/12 by MSMED facilitation Council Pune, which has been concurrently upheld by ADJ Pune in MCA 352/13 & by High court Bombay in ARA15/14 after imposing five lac additional penalty. (3) the award is partially executed in Darkhast 1741/12 before ADJ PUNE. (4) the award has been set aside by order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 intentionally by relying on fabricated/frustrated document by splitting the liability amongst Bank till 24.7.2008 (about 15 months) and about 108 months onto Auction Purchasers (one expired in 2011) with whom Petitioner has no legal or other arrangements and directing petitioner to approach MSMED facilitation council for ascertainment of payment @MSMED ACT from auction Purchasers. (5) The council refused to accept and entertain application of Petitioner as they have no jurisdiction to recover MSE dues from deceased. (6) Petitioner repeatedly submitted death certificate issued by Health department of Pune Municipal Corporation in an IA in CA5150/17, in RP777/18, various MAs but it was not only taken note of, but Petiitoner was fined for repeatedly submitting it.  (6) Because the order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 set aside the award as it had imposed total liability onto Bank only, but because the award has been set aside Bank refused to pay penal interest on delayed payment. (7) Petitioner had to again approach Supreme court vide WP189/18 seeking ascertainment of statutory rights as per MSMED Act, but during the argument Petitioner was told that it is not Supreme court but executioner court & Bank at Pune who have refused therefore appropriate remedy lied before High court Bombay and granted liberty on 12.3.2018 to petitioner to approach, High Court therefore (8) Petitioner withdrew WP189/18 and filed WP3809/18 before high court Bombay.(9) Meanwhile Bank filed application in Darkhast on basis order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 of Supreme Court denying payment as per MSMED act, which Petitioner had to defend invoking special jurisdiction of Executioner court to eliminate illegal obstruction in execution proceedings of award, saying that the order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 is nullity and non est in the eyes of law and therefore impotent to stop lawful execution proceedings. However, the Executioner court said that orders of Supreme court are always overriding Petitioner therefore filed WP2847/22 before High Court Bombay. (10) Then bank without taking penal interest on delayed payment into account demanded difference from earlier release of part payment which Petitioner had received and exhausted for paying pending charges partially. (11) An arrest warrant as per Order 21 Rule 38 of CPC was issued against the Decree holder corporate Petitioner and 3rd party Managing Director of Petitioner was arrested without notice. Petitioner filed WP9159/22 before High court Bombay. (12) Petitioner had filed an aplln b4 DRT for initiating penal action as per sec 340, perjury, criminal conspiracy etc  for misrepresenting DRT on oath in appeal 25/7, and on that basis further supreme court in CA5150/17 however DRT refused to take any action citing its limited jurisdiction but allowed liberty to Petitioner to initiate appropriate action. Petitioner filed MCRA 2446/21, and cognizance of offences was taken and Petitioner appln was converted to RCC2917/23 wherein the learned Magistrate directed police to conduct investigation u/s 202, accordingly Police submitted report on 1.9.23 and confirmed that the fraud is committed. Referring to police report u/s 202 Petitioner invoked constitutional remedy u/a 32 and filed WP Dno 4554/24 seeking recall of order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 as per sec 44 of the evidence act as it was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation and concealment of vital facts. but supreme court refused constitutional remedy on 4.3.24. (13)  WP3809/18 set aside the arrest warrant but did not consider ascertainment of rights of Petitioner @MSMED Act 2006. (14) WP 2847/21, & wp9159/22 on 20.11.25 just setting aside the orders of Executioner court but rights of Petitioner @MSMED Act were not decided. (15) Petitioner therefore filed SLP12289 & 12290 of 25 but they were dismissed on 2.4.2026 without taking note of the contents or without allowing petitioner to submit his say using bad words calling Petitioner as Blackmailer for agitating its grievance (against supreme court order dated 5.12.17 in Ca5150 before high court (which supreme court itself had granted librty on 12.3.2018 in WP189/18) . the Honble chief justice further deprived of agitating its grievance else Petitioner would be severely fined.

such a simple matter where Petitioner has done no mistake/fault, and which is protected by special enactment to MSMED Act deliver justice to MSEs within 90 days with special public policy to protect survival of MSEs who are contributing nearly 45% of the national produce is being mocked by Chief Justice Supreme court to help law offender. It is supreme court who has delayed the further payment of partially executed arbitral award since 20.4.15 in SLP2745/15. Because of the delay before supreme court the amount of penal interest has escalated as per sec 15-17 of MSMED Act in thousands of crores and has forced Petitioner running from court to court under financial distress and closure. And now Chief justice is hurling humiliating bad words to suppress claim of law-abiding Petitioner.

the main delay is before Supreme Court for 14 years on illegal grounds, by abusing absolute constitutional authority and blanket immunity, by entertaining fraud/misrepresentation intentionally ignoring evidence concurrently upheld by all lower courts (order 5.12.17 in CA5150/17), tampering statutory jurisdiction of two semi judicial tribunals MSMED ACT &RDDBA act (order 5.12.17 in CA5150/17) just to fool MSE and deny legitimate payment,  by frustrating claim intentionally  with universally nonest nullity non executional order by impleading a deceased and imposing/transferring liability on deceased (order 5.12.17 in CA5150/17), disallowing constitutional remedy (WP189/18, WP dno 4554/24)to recall orders breaching constitutional rights by supreme court, imposing heavy illegal fines for resubmitting truth (ma1831/20), not taking note of submissions and not allowing to argue , by giving humiliating bad words( By CJI Chandrakant on 2.4.2026 SLP12289, 12290/26), etc  with explicit bias to support mighty buyer to enjoy fruits by violating statutory MSMED Act  delaying payment and forcing closure of humble MSEs, facilitating loot of Rs 66 lacs in open public auction conducted by DRT in the name of administration of justice, helping Bank/DRT deny physical possession of property sold in public auction for twenty years after accepting total price . facilitate defaulting borrower to retain and earn by leasing auctioned property, 

 

Copiar enlace
WhatsApp
Facebook
X
Email