Petitioner is a humble MSE a qualifying supplier who has provided eligible services in interest of Bank of India , but Bank of India has not paid service charges of 123 months from 8.5.2007 to 8.8.2017 till date . An arbitral award 12.9.12 in petition 28/12 @MSMEDAct, a special act with overiding jurisdiction to ensure timely payment to MSEs in 90 days to avoid their closure, has been passed in favor of Petitioner, which has been concurrently upheld by all lower courts(MCA 352/13 befoe district court Pune, ARA15/14 high court of Bombay), attained finality and is partially executed. But supremecourt knowingly to support the law violator relying on fraudulent fabricated document submitted by Bank in order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 split the liability, impleaded and imposed unascertained part of liability on a deceased Pradip Bhansali who expired in 2011 intentionally rendering the award to be non executant and nullity. Petitioner submitted Death certificate and repeatedly agitated its grievance before the court which was supressed by opressive fine of Rs 1 lac. while the council refused to ascertain liability afresh @MSMEDAct from Pradip Bhansali because it lacks jurisdiction to recover dues from a deceased. However the award executing court did not appreciate nullity/illegality of order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 and stopped execution even to the extend permitted by order dated 5.12.17 in CA5150/17 therefore Petitioner approached supreme  court vide WP189/18 , but supremecourt directed Petitioner to file WP before high court which was filed as WP3809/18 & WP9159/22 where in the high court created further confusion to delay & frustrate by directing Petitioner to approach DRT a semi judicial tribunal having no jurisdiction to ascertain entitlement and quantum of penal interest @MSMED Act 2006, against which Petitioner agitated vide  SLP 70536/25 & 74079/25 b4 supremecourt which have been mocked and dismissed for being from a party in person with humble standing. It has been confirmed by an inquiry by police/CBI  that Bank is stating falsely before supreme court. Petitioner filed WP Dno 45504 with concrete evidence under constitutional remedy u/a 32, but supreme court refused to accept and entertain it saying that WPs to recall orders of Supreme court accusing fraud/misrepresentation as per sec 44 of the evidence act are not allowed.

The supreme court judges are openly abusing absolute authority and blanket immunity to help law violator bank to extract 123 months services for free and fake delivery of physical possession to auction purchasers from whom the bank of India and bank of baroda have recovered their outstanding dues out of sales proceeds of 66 lacs in auction conducted by Debts recovery Tribunal. The custodians of fundamental rights constitution/law are are abusing authority to mock, deny and frustrate fundamental right of wages at adequate rate and timely payment as per MSMED act, garanteed under constitution and statute. 

Though the fact that Petitioner has provided services without any complain has never been an issue in 19 years of litigation, even the respondent Bank has repeatedly admitted that Petitioner should be paid but supreme court is abusing absolute authority 2 help the law violator Bank to delay and frustrate claim of Petitioner ascertained as a matter of statutory right under MSMED Act, with illegal/untenable/prohibited pleas rather than doing solemn constitutional duties to protect rights of grieved humble #MSE Petitioner.

Thus the Indian judiciary, especially the judges of present supreme court are abusing authority & blanket immunity to nurture criminality in India, making survival of humble poor  intolerable