More video proof and information can be found on the following social media accounts.

YouTube:  @charleneblake9144

Tik Tok: CharleneKattKatt

Facebook: Charlene Blake https://www.facebook.com/share/19mirkiYvQ/?mibextid=wwXIfr

 

Below is an email dated July 30, 2025 sent to Manager of Human Resources at WorkplaceNL (illegal management organization created that is pretending to be the legal injured workers commission under the Workplace Health and Safety Compensation Act in Newfoundland and Labrador.)

Dustin Blake's recurrence that began on Aug 5, 2019.

Aug 16, 2019 claim notes.

Kim Doyle states "Initial diagnosis in 2018 WAS meniscal tear and sprain."

This is a 100% FALSE STATEMENT!

The LISTED diagnosis by Sasha Gale on Jan 17, 2018 was "ligament sprain" with part of body being right knee.

Frank Simms, WorkplaceNL Physiotherapy Consultant reports on March 6, 2018:

An emerg physician and the workers GP diagnosed a 2nd degree ligament sprain.  The attending physiotherapist FEELS there MAY be a meniscal tear!

On Aug 16, 2019, Kimberley Doyle FALSELY recorded that the initial diagnosis WAS a meniscal tear and sprain.

There was ZERO medical proof to support her false claim.  HOWEVER, the reality is she took guesses by the physiotherapist and reported them as PROVEN FACTS!  WHICH IS ILLEGAL!

Greg Brown, Medical consultant Sept 12, 2019 did not stick to the medical facts already recorded.  He recorded "worker HAD a soft tissue/ligamentous injury during Jan of 2018".  He SHOULD have recorded that worker HAD been diagnosed with a 2nd degree ligament sprain in the right knee by attending Emerg physician for injury that occurred as a result of Jan 10, 2018 workplace incident.

Greg DID note that the current diagnosis was a ligamentous injury and some question of gout was raised in a recent ER triage note in AB.  He went on to state that he had difficulty connecting the injury.  Well, the facts prove he had more difficultly reporting the original injury facts and the current injury facts to match each other.  

Original injury facts:  2nd degree ligament sprain in the right knee.

Current symptoms, without an incident to match causation of symptoms, is a ligamentous sprain of the right knee.

This is a DIRECT match to the diagnosis from the original injury that occurred as a result of a workplace incident on Jan 10, 2018.

On Aug 16, 2019, Kim Doyle's notes were from questions she was asking Dustin.  She was acting as if she was a medical professional and recording information as if she was going to be diagnosing Dustin herself.  In order to "adjudicate" a recurrence, you HAVE to use MEDICAL REPORTS ONLY!  Why was Kimberly Doyle asking Dustin these questions instead of focusing on the medical information she had?

A recurrence can NOT be proven or denied based on information given to her by Dustin.  This information adds unnecessary information to his file, creates HIGH possibility for inaccurate and misleading information to be recorded and possibly used as fact later on (which did actually happen later in his file.)

Here is proof it was used later in his file: 

Jan 27, 2021 Samantha Hackett reported his diagnosis as "Ligament sprain (2nd) and meniscal tear."  

By Jan 27, 2021 BOTH of those diagnosis were no longer the actual diagnosis.  

The actual diagnosis was a partial ACL tear proven by MRI results dated June 22, 2020 and received by WorkplaceNL on July 21, 2020.  

Missing from Claim notes is the receiving of this VERY IMPORTANT MEDICAL DOCUMENT AND THE ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF THE INJURY THAT OCCURRED ON Jan 10, 2018!  

On Aug 11, 2020, Lori Collins added more inaccurate recording of information regarding Dustin's actual diagnosis.  She stated she reviewed his file.  She might have reviewed it but did not accurately follow the medical information provided.  Here is PROOF!

Physio started on Jan 23, 2018 with a diagnosis of meniscal tear.  

If she had accurately reviewed ALL medical information she needed to support the request for an ACL brace, she would have NOT reported that the diagnosis was a meniscal tear.  She again mentioned "diagnosis indicated as a meniscal tear" further down that recorded claim note.  Then she states "On July 28, 2020 the provider requested that the client be provided with an ACL brace and indicated instability of the knee. He also noted that MRI revealed an ACL sprain."

Again Lori immediately REVERTS BACK to Meniscal diagnosis by FALSELY stating "MRI of June 22, 2020 revealed minimal findings: there is meniscal tear."  The MRI report CLEARLY states "There is no meniscal tear."  And CLEARLY states "There is some edematous signal around the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)."  Even a quick Google search for "edematous signal ACL" TELLS ME that "edematous signal in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) on an MRI indicates swelling and increased fluid within the ligament, which is a common finding in acute ACL tears."

Lori AGAIN  continues to report false claims in her review:  

"The ACL was found to be intact with some swelling around it, indicative of a "partial sprain".  This should not result in significant instability and in fact, instability has not been reported previously."

A quick google search indicates her inaccurate reporting of the MRI results CHANGES the diagnosis all together!

Google search for false report by Lori: intact ACL with some swelling indicates

Google search Results of false report by Lori:  "intact ACL with some swelling in the knee generally indicates a mild ACL injury, specifically a Grade 1 sprain. This means the ligament has been stretched but not torn, and the knee joint should still be relatively stable."

Google search for MRI report findings: "edematous signal ACL" 

TELLS ME that "edematous signal in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) on an MRI indicates swelling and increased fluid within the ligament, which is a common finding in acute ACL tears."

Google search of ACTUAL MRI results for symptoms:  edematous signal ACL symptoms

Results of google search:  "Symptoms associated with this finding typically include knee pain, swelling, and instability, particularly during weight-bearing activities"

Dustin's ACTUAL MRI results PROVES instability IS A SYMPTOM!  Lori's FALSE report removes the most important symptom DIRECTLY RELATED TO HIS ACTUAL DIAGNOSIS!

Lori also reported in this claim note:  "instability has not been previously reported".  This is 100% a false claim!  On August 7, 2019, Dustin's GP in Fort McMurray reported "associated symptoms clicks, pops, and instability"

Lori ends this claim note with the following: It would be my opinion that this client does not require a brace for ACL insufficiency".

Well, of COURSE you would not support this brace based on YOUR FALSE CLAIMS LORI!

Lori focused on the knee injury being meniscus.  Lori turned the diagnosed 2nd degree knee ligament sprain into a 1st degree!  The MAIN difference being with a 1st degree (grade 1) you can bear weight and indicates no instability.  Dustin's original injury symptoms and recurrence symptoms included instability and inability to bear weight.

Lori Collins claim note is very inaccurate.  Delayed the purchase of the brace that was requested based on the FACTUAL medical information provided!

Norbert Lake Aug 8, 2020, continued to report "worker has a torn meniscus and a sprained ACL". and used this false information in his weight of evidence for his opinion on whether the requested chiropractic coverage would be needed.  How was he suppose to provide an ACCURATE opinion based on false medical information?

Aug 8, 2020 CBOR Claim Notes by Sasha Gale:

"Please include the attached medical AND summary of claim thus far."

This "summary" of hers stated the following 100% PROVEN INACCURATE INFORMATION!

- "diagnosis of meniscal tear" (this diagnosis was NEVER part of a formal diagnosis supported by medical imaging)
- "The MRI of June 22, 2020 revealed minimal findings: there is meniscal tear"

TWICE SHE REPORTED PROVEN 100% COMPLETE FALSE MEDICAL INFORMATION!

Aug 8, 2020 Sasha Gale reported the results from Ian who completed the CBOR intake screening evaluation.  The email did not weigh on favor of Sasha approving the CBOR program.  

As per WorkplaceNL website, CBOR information page: 

"An intensive treatment program specifically designed to address an injured worker’s physical capacity and function as it relates to his/her job demands."

Ian CLEARLY states "CAUTIOUS strengthening, balance work, and attempts to increase his stand/walk tolerances BUT I WOULD HAVE TO EXPRESS CONCERN GIVEN HOW LONG HE IS OUT NOW"!!!

At the end of Ian's email he states: "tough situation, if you want to discuss this more, feel free to call me.  Sasha did NOT attempt to discuss this further!    What part of these facts supports Sasha Gale approving Dustin for CBOR?  Because I 100% would NEVER have approved ANY injured worker based on these facts:

The CBOR program is "INTENSIVE" and Ian CLEARLY SAYS "CAUTIOUS"!

Kelli, how many times does this information have to be sent before those who handled his file is held accountable for the inaccurate reporting?  And this is ALL LONG before the modified working duties that Melissa Burry turned into disabling symptoms!

This email does not even TOUCH on the unfair results of his compensation payments which were paid WITHOUT adequate collection of circumstances and where the Max compensable and 85% were applied when FACTUAL INFORMATION WOULD EXEMPT HIM FROM BOTH!

The facts that his compensation payments were STOPPED WITHOUT USING ACTUAL MATH CALCULATIONS TO PROVE NO LOSS OF EARNINGS WOULD DROP THE PAYMENTS TO ZERO!

Kelli, the evidence against the employees that proves they TURNED DUSTIN'S FILE INTO A COMPLETELY FALSE REPORT FROM BEGINNING TO PRESENT HAS BEEN CLEARLY DOCUMENTED IN THIS EMAIL!!!!

THIS IS A PROBLEM THAT HUMAN RESOURCES HAS TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATELY BY HOLDING THESE EMPLOYEES ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR LACK OF ACCURATE REPORTING!

A PROFESSIONAL HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER WOULD FACT CHECK THIS ENTIRE EMAIL, IMMEDIATELY CONTACT DUSTIN AND MYSELF TO REINSTATE RESPECTFUL COMMUNICATION BY STARTING WITH AN APOLOGY AND ASSURING US THAT DUSTIN WILL BE GIVEN ONE TRUSTWORTHY EMPLOYEE TO HANDLE HIS MEDICAL AND HIS LOSS OF EARNINGS COMPENSATION PAYMENTS, AND SUPPORTIVE COVERAGE OF HIS NECESSARY CHIROPRACTOR TREATMENTS!

I have switched to ALL CAPS because I DO NOT TRUST YOU TO DO THE RIGHT THING EITHER!  AND I AM WAITING FOR YOU TO PROVE TO ME THAT I WAS RIGHT!  THAT YOU ARE EQUALLY AS UNCARING, UNETHICAL, UNPROFESSIONAL, AND IMMATURE as the rest of them!

How sad that FACTS MEAN SO LITTLE AND PROTECTING THE ONES WHO CREATED SUCH A MESS OF DUSTIN'S FILE IS MORE IMPORTANT!

BEING INJURED IS NOT A WALK IN THE PARK!  

And IF THIS WAS YOUR HUSBAND, WOULD YOU JUST SIT BACK AND KISS YOUR EMPLOYEES ARSE AND PAT THEIR BACKS FOR A JOB WELL DONE?

Are you going to do the right thing?

Sincerely,
Charlene Blake