As Jonathan Freedland notes in The Guardian today: ''Even the softest, mildest Brexit-with-a-deal represents an act of national folly that would have had Cnut shaking his head in disbelief. Take a look at Labour’s demands – alignment with the single market and on workers’ rights along with a say over EU trade deals – and realise that these are the things we already have under our current deal, namely EU membership. The very best that can be said for Labour’s Brexit is that it will only be much worse than the status quo rather than much, much worse."

It is a sad state of affairs that headlines in the UK Press are more about some Thai princess trying to become Prime Minister (of Thailand not the UK I might add), than the coming break-up of the UK.  The BBC's balanced view has, in fact, helped the forthcoming break up of the ''United'' Kingdom with barely a sigh.

Theresa May's so-called deal is pathetic and far worse than staying in the EU. While Corbyn, having wasted two years simply criticising May without analysing what Labour would lose once Brexit happens, has been a total failure.  Oh yes, chaps, implies Corbyn I know that the EU wont accept any changes to the Deal, so here are our ideas. Worse than uselss!

Meanwhile with practically no information on what BREXIT will mean, the British public is waking up to their forthcoming loss: "The polling sage John Curtice reported today that his poll of polls now has remain leading leave by 54% to 46%, with pro-Europeans way out in front among those who did not vote in 2016 (often because they were too young to do so). More striking is the small but distinct erosion of support for Brexit among those who voted leave last time. "

So where are OUR leaders?