Hampshire County Opposition to the Valley North Project

206

Let’s get to 500 signatures!
Petitions with 1,000+ supporters are 5x more likely to win!

The Issue

Where as:

We, the undersigned:

Residents, landowners, and utility ratepayers of Hampshire County West Virginia, formally petition the Public Service Commission to DENY the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) for the proposed Valley North Project put forward by Valley Link Transmission Company, LLC.

     As local citizens who live, work, and own property along the proposed corridors, we strongly object to this massive industrial infrastructure project based on the following critical impacts to our communities:

Unfair Ratepayer Burden: West Virginia families should not suffer an estimated hundreds of millions of dollars in added power bill costs to construct infrastructure designed to export power to data centers and grids in neighboring states.
Destruction of Private Property Rights: The proposed routes threaten our agricultural Farms, homes, family farms, and land values, subjecting West Virginia property owners to the severe threat of forced easements and eminent domain.
Severe Environmental & Visual Blight: Constructing steel transmission towers averaging 135 to 175 feet tall with large 500 Fett of Easement along the route, will permanently scar our mountains, ruin scenic viewsheds, fragment active agricultural land, and damage local tourism economies. Destroying over 7,000 acres of the Appalachian Mountains, harming our environment and numerous species of plant, animal and insect life, ruining farms and local agriculture, and most importantly taking away the reasons that most people choose to live in "Almost Heaven" West Virginia, the peace and quiet , the beauty of our land and the homes built by many for not only their families but for generations to come.
     We request that the Public Service Commission of WV Deny the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for The Valley North Project, thus suspending further planning on the proposed cross-state route and formally report back to PJM Interconnection that a regional transmission solution is inappropriate for this localized demand. The energy deficit driving this project is localized heavily within Northern Virginia’s industrial corridors. Rather than using eminent domain to cut a 260-mile corridor across state lines from West Virginia, Valley Link’s parent companies—specifically Dominion Energy—must prioritize the development of in-state generation and localized battery storage solutions directly within Virginia. West Virginia communities and landowners should not suffer the environmental, visual, and financial burdens of a project designed to subsidize out-of-state industrial growth.

      We urge our Public Service Commission to stand with West Virginia residents, protect our land and financial interests, reject Valley Link Transmission's upcoming application, and demand non-destructive alternatives.

 

The Decision Makers

West Virginia House of Delegates
2 Members
1 Responded
David Cannon
West Virginia House of Delegates - District 89
This project threatens private property rights through the potential use of eminent domain, cuts across productive farms and family-owned land, and risks harming the tourism, agriculture, and outdoor recreation industries that are vital to Hampshire and Morgan Counties. I believe West Virginia should not be expected to bear these burdens unless there is a clear and substantial benefit to our citizens. Based on the information available, this project is part of a broader effort to strengthen the regional electric transmission system serving the PJM grid, including growing electricity demand in neighboring states. In my view, West Virginians should not have to sacrifice their land and communities to accommodate energy policy decisions made elsewhere. Reliable electricity remains dependent on dispatchable generation such as coal and natural gas, and West Virginia continues to play a major role in providing that dependable power. What Can a State Legislator Do? Many people have asked what authority a legislator has in this process. While the Legislature is in session, we can: • Introduce and support legislation that strengthens private property rights. • Advocate for greater transparency and accountability. • Conduct oversight where state law permits. • Work with fellow legislators to improve protections for West Virginia landowners. When the Legislature is out of session, we can: • Meet with landowners and local officials. • Advocate publicly on behalf of our communities. • Communicate concerns directly to state agencies and decision-makers. • Encourage citizen participation throughout the regulatory process. • Use the office and public platform entrusted to us to keep pressure on this issue. Who Makes the Decision? Under West Virginia law, the West Virginia Public Service Commission (PSC) has the sole authority to determine whether a transmission project requiring its approval receives a certificate to be constructed. The PSC is a quasi-judicial commission, meaning it functions much like a court. It reviews sworn testimony, engineering studies, environmental evidence, legal arguments, and the public record before issuing its decision. Neither the Governor nor the Legislature can simply approve or deny a transmission line by executive order or legislative vote once a case is before the Commission. My Commitment I will continue using every lawful tool available to oppose the MARL Transmission Line, defend private property rights, protect the economic future of Hampshire and Morgan Counties, and ensure the voices of our citizens are heard throughout this process. West Virginia should never be treated as a corridor for projects that ask our communities to bear the burden while others receive most of the benefit. David Cannon WV HOUSE Committees: Judiciary Energy and Public Works Economic Development Infrastructure, Technology, Environment/Agriculture [Note: The Change.org Civic Engagement Team reaches out to decision makers to let them know about petitions in their community and to help facilitate engagement with supporters. The above was an email response we received regarding this petition.]
Rick Hillenbrand
West Virginia House of Delegates - District 88
West Virginia State Senate
2 Members
Darren Thorne
West Virginia State Senate - District 15
Thomas Willis
West Virginia State Senate - District 15

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates