Anthony R. Friedman was the "Proto-Malfeasor" The origin of malfeasance
Anthony R. Friedman was the "Proto-Malfeasor"
With regard to Anthony R. Friedman Mo. Bar #65531 now d/b/a/ Friedman Law Firm LLC in St. Louis, St. Charles this animated gif compresses four allegations into a short narrative.
1) Anthony R. Friedman was the "Proto-Malfeasor" Friedman shared privileged information with opposing counsel without informed consent from the client on June 26, 2023 at a mediated settlement agreement conference in the matter of Pepper v Gelfand M.D. case #19SL-CC04680 that was tried in the St. Louis County Judicial Circuit of Missouri between 2019 / 2024. see: Complaint filed with the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel (file #25-2531-X) Academia Edu - Active Investigation: Anthony R. Friedman (MO Bar #65531) - Official O.C.D.C. Complaint and Disciplinary Case #25-2531-X
2) Anthony R. Friedman is no longer with The Simon Law Firm P.C. in St. Louis Missouri because "He lost seven out of eight cases he took to trial" as per the testimony of Timothy M. Cronin and Elizabeth S. Lenivy who are former colleagues of Friedman that are yet employed with The Simon Law Firm P.C. - Albert B. Pepper Jr. has executed a sworn affidavit that these statements were 1) captured in a telephone audio recording with Timothy M Cronin 2) Made directly to Pepper by Lenivy in a "trial prep" meeting. see: sworn affidavit. (Not) The Friedman Law Firm Saint Charles - Not the Friedman Law Firm Saint Charles Saint Louis
3) Anthony R. Friedman has been reduced to litigating for crumbs. Since the beginning of his solo practice d/b/a/ Friedman Law Firm LLC both public records and trial court records from CaseNet Mo. indicate that Friedman has not been involved in nor been successful in any "high stakes" litigation. In fact, Friedman was involved in a dispute with the Missouri Department of Revenue concerning a replacement title for a Vespa Motor Scooter worth approximately $1,500 and a tenant landlord dispute where for a $500 fee Friedman successfully had a woman evicted from her home and proceeded to attach her savings at a credit union to satisfy outstanding rent. see: the following to CaseNet entries.
Friedman v Dept. of Rev. - Vespa Scooter case #2411-CC00492 - http://Case.net: 2411-CC00492 - Case Header
Vizag v Baylor - Landlord / Tenant eviction case #2511-AC07491 - http://Case.net: 2511-AC07491 - Case Header
Created by: Albert B. Pepper Jr. - Phoenix Rising Productions LLC / The Society of Professional Journalist