

Fight for a Sepulveda subway line that works for UCLA's students and faculty
The Issue
The future of UCLA transportation is set to be dramatically improved with the construction of the future Sepulveda rail line. This would connect the UCLA campus to the San Fernando Valley and directly to LAX -- Bruins could soon be riding from the airport to campus for $1.75 and it would be quicker than driving.
There are two mode alternatives for this line, a heavy rail (or subway system) that would run underground or a monorail running in the median of the 405 freeway. The heavy rail system has a significantly higher capacity, a 10 minute quicker travel time, and a direct connection with UCLA. The monorail would force riders to wait on the polluted 405 freeway for a system that would be slower and carry far fewer people. The monorail wouldn't integrate with any of the existing lines in our transit system; its station in Westwood would be over a mile from UCLA's campus. When Metro surveyed the general public, 93% of respondents were in favor of heavy rail.
Despite the clear and innumerable benefits heavy rail brings to UCLA and the vast community support it enjoys, our administration has remained silent. The reason: instead of listening to student voices, our admins have prioritized the complaints of a few vocal homeowners in Bel Air. Through backdoor meetings and violations of contract, UCLA has allowed the unfounded arguments of the wealthiest and most entitled members of this city decide the future for our students and faculty.
Let's not forget what's at stake here. The climate crisis continues to threaten us all. Reducing traffic on one of the most congested freeways in America is a crucial step in reducing emissions. This rail line has an opportunity to correct the many inequities transportation planners have inflicted on communities of color. But none of this is possible if Bel Air gets its way.
Join the fight for Sepulveda now. Tell UCLA our campus needs a subway and won't be bullied by the billionaires of Bel Air.

Petition Closed
The Issue
The future of UCLA transportation is set to be dramatically improved with the construction of the future Sepulveda rail line. This would connect the UCLA campus to the San Fernando Valley and directly to LAX -- Bruins could soon be riding from the airport to campus for $1.75 and it would be quicker than driving.
There are two mode alternatives for this line, a heavy rail (or subway system) that would run underground or a monorail running in the median of the 405 freeway. The heavy rail system has a significantly higher capacity, a 10 minute quicker travel time, and a direct connection with UCLA. The monorail would force riders to wait on the polluted 405 freeway for a system that would be slower and carry far fewer people. The monorail wouldn't integrate with any of the existing lines in our transit system; its station in Westwood would be over a mile from UCLA's campus. When Metro surveyed the general public, 93% of respondents were in favor of heavy rail.
Despite the clear and innumerable benefits heavy rail brings to UCLA and the vast community support it enjoys, our administration has remained silent. The reason: instead of listening to student voices, our admins have prioritized the complaints of a few vocal homeowners in Bel Air. Through backdoor meetings and violations of contract, UCLA has allowed the unfounded arguments of the wealthiest and most entitled members of this city decide the future for our students and faculty.
Let's not forget what's at stake here. The climate crisis continues to threaten us all. Reducing traffic on one of the most congested freeways in America is a crucial step in reducing emissions. This rail line has an opportunity to correct the many inequities transportation planners have inflicted on communities of color. But none of this is possible if Bel Air gets its way.
Join the fight for Sepulveda now. Tell UCLA our campus needs a subway and won't be bullied by the billionaires of Bel Air.

Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on January 19, 2023