Have I mentioned how much I miss him? Ehh. 

His most recent appeal at the 7th distrcit, based on ineffective assistance of counsel was "affirmed". However, the Justices did agree that we had good arguments related to the dash cam and meta-data, but they still ruled against it, stating "defendent still would have bee found guilty based on witness testimony". Guess it means nothing these days when you knowingly lie under oath. 

John's Attorney filed a reconsideration at the Supreme Court and I would imagine that coming back this month with "affirmed" as well. It just doesn't make sense to me. 

The courts denied review by a forensic expert of the dash cam, stating same thing the 7th district stated "based on witness testimony". 

If you come across this update, can you pray for John and his case. We're only asking for a review of the dash cam knowing the chain of custody was broken. All we want is a fair trial. No lies, no cover-ups, just a fair trial. 

Don't forget to check out www.divine-emerald.com for the latest updates. 

As always, you are loved and appreciated.