Vermont Superior Court, Bennington Unit: Court that denied a civil stalking protective order sought by Lauren Ronan, finding that Gamache's conduct did not meet the statutory definition of stalking under Vermont law. (legal doctrine Res Judicata is now invoked)
13 V.S.A. § 7602(c): Statute under which Gamache is eligible for expungement after ten years, and he now presents his petition twelve years after the successful completion of his sentence.6 (however, all sentencing was suspended and no jail time was served. which nullifies the conviction based off of merit and statutory fact. Mr. Gamache will continue to tell the facts as they really happened)
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Amendment under which Gamache argues that the state's continued use of his conviction against him violates his due process and equal protection rights.4
Chapter I, Article 10 of the Vermont Constitution: Article under which Gamache asserts that the state's actions constitute a violation of his rights.4
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963): Supreme Court case that requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence, and any violation thereof invalidates a criminal proceeding.2 (Trooper's Ronan, Mozzer, Robillard, and former bennington state attorney alexander burke continue to violate this)
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969): Supreme Court case that reaffirms the right to privacy in one's home and data, free from unwarranted governmental inspection.2
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a): Federal law that prohibits unauthorized disclosure of personal records.7
Vermont Rules of Evidence: Rules that prohibit the admission of hearsay and irrelevant allegations in court proceedings.4
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970): Supreme Court case that holds that all elements of a criminal offense must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.4 (nothing was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. A police report written not based on fact but by speculation. Lauren Ronan committed an act of fraud)
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970): Supreme Court case that requires procedural due process when the state impairs liberty or reputation.4
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009): Supreme Court case that states judicial bias or appearance thereof violates due process.4
1 V.S.A.: Vermont statute that governs privacy and sealing statutes.4
13 V.S.A. § 7607(d): Vermont statute that states upon expungement, the person "shall be treated in all respects as if he or she had never been convicted".4
28 U.S.C. § 2254: Statute that provides for collateral relief in cases of constitutional violations.2
Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 33: Rule that allows for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence or legal error. (however due to the legal challenge, this now nullifies the plea and erase the conviction from a non-violent, none threatening, non-emergency phone call led by Mr. Mangiacotti himself which significantly allows this matter to be deleted)
According to Lauren Ronan, no communication was threaten or violent, she believe she is above the law but wouldn't know right from wrong if right was in front of her face. Qualified immunity is not just, a badge is not merit, but overly punitive abuse of power.
This post is constitutionally protected and shall not be infringed upon by any public person, or any government official.