Summary 

We call on Congress, state legislators, and federal oversight agencies to strengthen accountability for tech employees who engage in online hate, harassment, or class-based discrimination—especially when such behavior is carried out under the protection of corporate or immigration privilege.

⸻
Background 

A publicly reported case involving Xiaoyan Zhu, a former Meta employee, illustrates the need for stronger oversight.

 According to public sources — including a Change.org petition and court records from King County Superior Court — Zhu was accused of harassing over twenty individuals online, using racially discriminatory and class-based insults.

Public archives show that she repeatedly boasted of her wealth (“three million dollars in my account”), academic pedigree (“top-ten major”), and corporate status to belittle not only lower-income individuals but also PhD professionals whose earnings she deemed inferior to her own.

Meta reportedly terminated her employment in August 2025.

She also abused judicial public resources by filing three consecutive DVPO (Domestic Violence Protection Order) applications over the same case (Zhu vs Zeng) from July to October 2025, all of which were denied by the court due to lack of evidence.

Her conduct triggered widespread concern about how privilege and power can enable abuse.

This case is not an isolated incident—it highlights a broader problem: there is little accountability when tech workers use their influence or immigration status to bully or discriminate against others online.

⸻
What We Ask 

 1️⃣ Enhance Employer Accountability Require major tech companies to investigate and publicly report verified cases of hate speech or harassment by employees.

 2️⃣ Integrate Cross-Agency Oversight Create channels between employers, EEOC, and USCIS to review verified misconduct by permanent residents under consistent moral-character standards.

3️⃣ Protect Victims and Preserve Evidence Mandate that platforms preserve digital evidence once credible complaints are filed, enabling lawful review.

4️⃣ Promote Digital Ethics and Training Implement mandatory ethics and anti-discrimination education for tech workers, emphasizing respect regardless of income or background.

 ⸻
Purpose & Statement 

This petition does not target or punish any single person. The Zhu case is cited solely as a public example showing why stronger oversight is urgently needed to protect digital civility and community safety. 

⸻
Call to Action 

If you believe that tech companies and U.S. immigration systems should uphold equality, accountability, and respect, please sign and share this petition today.

摘要
    我们呼吁美国国会、州议员及联邦监管机构，加强对科技从业者网络仇恨、骚扰与阶层歧视行为的监管与问责，尤其是在他们借助企业或移民身份特权从事伤害性行为时。

背景说明
    一例公开报道的事件——涉及前 Meta 员工 朱晓燕 (音译：Xiaoyan Zhu)——揭示了监管的缺口。
    据 Change.org 请愿与华盛顿州 King County 法院记录，她曾在社交媒体上辱骂二十多名网友，并发表种族及阶层歧视言论。 公共资料显示，她多次炫耀个人财富（“账户有三百万美金”）、学术背景（“Top 10 专业”）与大厂身份，不仅贬低低收入群体，也轻视那些收入不如她的博士群体。
    据报道，Meta 公司于 2025 年 8 月终止其雇佣关系。 朱晓燕（音译: Xiaoyan Zhu)还滥用司法公共资源，从2025年7月到10月，就一个案件(Zhu vs Zeng)连续三次提出 DVPO（家庭暴力保护令）申请，但均因缺乏证据而被法院驳回。
    这一行为引发公众对科技从业者滥用社会资源与移民特权的担忧。
    此案并非个例，而是一个警示： 当科技从业者利用影响力或移民身份在网络上攻击他人时，缺乏应有的监管与问责。

我们的诉求
1️⃣ 要求大型科技公司对员工涉及仇恨言论与骚扰的案件进行透明调查并公开报告。

 2️⃣ 建立雇主、平等就业机会委员会 (EEOC) 与美国移民局 (USCIS) 之间的沟通机制，确保对永久居民不当行为的审查一致且合法。

3️⃣ 要求社交平台在收到可信举报后保留数字证据，以便调查与取证。

4️⃣ 在科技行业推行职业伦理与反歧视培训，倡导对不同收入与背景人士的平等尊重。

请愿目的
    本请愿并非针对个人惩罚，而是以朱晓燕（音译：Xiaoyan Zhu）案为公开范例，说明建立更完善监管机制的必要性，以维护网络文明与公众安全。

行动号召 
    如果你相信科技行业与美国制度应当以平等、责任与尊重为核心，请签署并分享这份请愿，让制度改进成为公众共识与社会行动。