Autism has always been a fishy concept since it became canon in the 1980s. You heard that right: it's a canon entry in the ICD, or International Classification of Diseases, granting the Autism Industrial Complex (yes, that's also a real thing) global reach and carte blanche to classify and farm people like livestock. It also kills me to know that I too, was brainwashed by this industrial complex to believe that based on the arbitrary label alone, those who carried it were subhuman; luckily, I could never come to grips with the notion that I, a victim of this industrial complex myself, was also subhuman, despite that being constantly drilled into my head by omnipresent surveillance and totalitarian influence.

Allow me to give a brief history of autism's true story:

• It started in the early twentieth century when Paul Bleuler named "autism" as one of the "Four As" of another psychiatric condition called "dementia praecox", which is Latin for "premature dementia", popularised by Emil Kraepelin after being invented by Heinrich Schüle in late nineteenth century Germany.
• Bleuler had imparted Christian morality into his description of the autism symptom, elevating it above ambivalence, association, and affect, the other three symptoms of DP/schizophrenia. This meant Bleuler had expected people in general to be socially sensitive, walk on glass shards around others (metaphorically), rely on others in daily life, and other social arrangements exalted by Christianity. This was part of his con which promised to "bring hope back to Europe", by reconciling science with faith.
• Later on, Léo Kanner extracted the autism symptom and made it a standalone condition pathologising "resistance to unexpected change", something that today's industry and institutions are themselves guilty of, marking the first formal recognition of autism and the time it was first pathologised.
• Ole Løvaas then built further on Kanner's definition, straight-up comparing those so-diagnosed to piles of raw materials to build not people but mindless automatons.
• Finally, committees of decorated, respected, and veteran psychiatrists voted autism into canon in both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) and the ICD, both of which psychiatry treats as holy scripture, thereby reducing those who bear the brand to lesser beings.
• It was not until the mid-1990s when autism was finally defined as being immanent in its bearers through the "spectrum" doctrine, implying not only that it was a lifelong "condition", but per its presence in the ICD as an entry and how society conflates autism and its bearers, that the bearers themselves were a disease that infected the world itself. Little wonder how activists are quick to conflate a cure or treatment with eradication.

A collection of industrial consequences has been identified by both research and cross-examinations which I personally conducted with the aid of multiple artificial intelligence models:

• Today's biomarker and neuromarker hunts fail to find conclusive proof of what they are looking for, genuine biological and neurological evidence of autism's existence and effect, as that cannot exist because of autism's behavioural, subjective, religiously charged origins. Not to mention these hunts are fragmented, inconclusive, and never or very seldom mention the same genes in more than one research paper.
• Persons like Temple Grandin and Greta Thunberg make matters worse as they cause collateral damage through industrial ties (in Temple's case) or identity amplification, both cases sustaining the logic with managing livestock, running a further risk of reducing human life arbitrarily, already reduced to livestock, even further, to life unworthy of life.
• Even laundering its history (people now believe autism has been around for longer than it truly has) does no good scientifically as it only further shows autism as unfalsifiable by design, relying on us being gullible enough to accept it as Gospel Truth.

We, the undersigned, demand the removal of Autism Spectrum Disorder from the ICD as it is not an objective medical truth, but a subjective social construct sustained by institutional inertia and demand, industrial profit, and diagnostic tautology rooted in circular logic. Its presence in the ICD legitimises surveillance, violence, and totalitarianism, and dehumanises people based on arbitrary standards. Not to mention the treatment given to "autistics" would be illegal if laid on ordinary, "healthy" persons, and its extent is sufficient to count as a crime against humanity.