Demand for Immediate Reinvestigation into the Death of Damond Lazenby Jr.

Recent signers:
Moon maat and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Formal Demand for Immediate Reinvestigation into the Death of Damond Lazenby Jr. Due to Evidentiary Gaps and Investigative Failure


⚖️ STATEMENT OF ISSUE
We, the family, community, and concerned citizens, submit this formal demand for a full, transparent, and independent reinvestigation into the death of Damond Lazenby Jr.
This is not a matter of speculation.
This is a matter of unresolved facts, incomplete explanations, and investigative deficiencies that prevent any reasonable person from accepting the current conclusion without question.
Damond Lazenby Jr., age 19, was reported missing on January 1, 2023. His vehicle was subsequently located abandoned on the roadside, engine running, with a flat tire. Days later, on January 7, 2023, his body was discovered along the Highway 4 corridor in Concord, California.
Authorities have classified this case as a hit-and-run.
That classification, based on what has been publicly disclosed, fails to account for critical facts and leaves material questions unanswered.


🔍 FINDINGS OF CONCERN
1. Timeline Irregularities
A six-day gap exists between disappearance and recovery
Search operations were conducted in the area prior to discovery
No comprehensive, publicly verified timeline has been provided
Conclusion: The sequence of events remains unclear, incomplete, and unsubstantiated.


2. Scene and Evidence Deficiencies
No detailed public disclosure of collision evidence consistent with a fatal vehicular strike
Absence of confirmed debris patterns, impact analysis, or reconstruction findings
Personal property, including phone and wallet, not recovered
Vehicle reportedly released without documented full forensic processing
Conclusion: Evidence handling and documentation appear insufficient to support a definitive ruling.


3. Search and Recovery Discrepancies
Multiple search methods deployed, including aerial and ground units
Subject not located during initial search operations
Body later found in an area reportedly covered
Conclusion: Raises a legitimate question as to search accuracy, timing, or post-search developments.


4. Reporting and Transparency Failures
No clearly presented, complete coroner’s report publicly confirmed
No detailed explanation of how the hit-and-run determination was reached
No full investigative narrative provided to the public or family
The current determination lacks transparent evidentiary support.


LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE POSITION


A conclusion of this magnitude must be supported by:
Verifiable physical evidence
A consistent and complete timeline
Properly documented investigative procedures


Clear articulation of how evidence leads to conclusion.


At present, the available information reflects gaps, not closure.


A determination issued without full disclosure of supporting evidence raises serious concerns regarding:


Investigative thoroughness


Evidence handling


Procedural integrity


These concerns warrant immediate review and independent examination.


 FORMAL DEMANDS
We formally demand:


A complete, documented timeline from last known contact to discovery
Full release of investigative findings, including reports and summaries.


Public confirmation and release of the coroner’s report.


Detailed explanation of search methodology and coverage.


Documentation of all evidence collection and handling procedures.


Clarification regarding missing personal property.


Independent reinvestigation by an outside agency or oversight body.


📢 PUBLIC INTEREST AND ACCOUNTABILITY


This case extends beyond one individual.
It speaks to the integrity of investigative processes and public trust in institutional accountability.


When conclusions are presented without full explanation,
it creates doubt.


When questions remain unanswered,
it creates concern.


And when concern is ignored,
it demands action.

 


A case is not closed because it is labeled.
It is closed when the evidence is complete, the timeline is clear, and the facts withstand scrutiny.
At present, this case does not meet that standard.


We are standing on facts.
Damond Lazenby Jr. deserves a complete and accountable investigation.


Sign. Share. Get Active 

48

Recent signers:
Moon maat and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Formal Demand for Immediate Reinvestigation into the Death of Damond Lazenby Jr. Due to Evidentiary Gaps and Investigative Failure


⚖️ STATEMENT OF ISSUE
We, the family, community, and concerned citizens, submit this formal demand for a full, transparent, and independent reinvestigation into the death of Damond Lazenby Jr.
This is not a matter of speculation.
This is a matter of unresolved facts, incomplete explanations, and investigative deficiencies that prevent any reasonable person from accepting the current conclusion without question.
Damond Lazenby Jr., age 19, was reported missing on January 1, 2023. His vehicle was subsequently located abandoned on the roadside, engine running, with a flat tire. Days later, on January 7, 2023, his body was discovered along the Highway 4 corridor in Concord, California.
Authorities have classified this case as a hit-and-run.
That classification, based on what has been publicly disclosed, fails to account for critical facts and leaves material questions unanswered.


🔍 FINDINGS OF CONCERN
1. Timeline Irregularities
A six-day gap exists between disappearance and recovery
Search operations were conducted in the area prior to discovery
No comprehensive, publicly verified timeline has been provided
Conclusion: The sequence of events remains unclear, incomplete, and unsubstantiated.


2. Scene and Evidence Deficiencies
No detailed public disclosure of collision evidence consistent with a fatal vehicular strike
Absence of confirmed debris patterns, impact analysis, or reconstruction findings
Personal property, including phone and wallet, not recovered
Vehicle reportedly released without documented full forensic processing
Conclusion: Evidence handling and documentation appear insufficient to support a definitive ruling.


3. Search and Recovery Discrepancies
Multiple search methods deployed, including aerial and ground units
Subject not located during initial search operations
Body later found in an area reportedly covered
Conclusion: Raises a legitimate question as to search accuracy, timing, or post-search developments.


4. Reporting and Transparency Failures
No clearly presented, complete coroner’s report publicly confirmed
No detailed explanation of how the hit-and-run determination was reached
No full investigative narrative provided to the public or family
The current determination lacks transparent evidentiary support.


LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE POSITION


A conclusion of this magnitude must be supported by:
Verifiable physical evidence
A consistent and complete timeline
Properly documented investigative procedures


Clear articulation of how evidence leads to conclusion.


At present, the available information reflects gaps, not closure.


A determination issued without full disclosure of supporting evidence raises serious concerns regarding:


Investigative thoroughness


Evidence handling


Procedural integrity


These concerns warrant immediate review and independent examination.


 FORMAL DEMANDS
We formally demand:


A complete, documented timeline from last known contact to discovery
Full release of investigative findings, including reports and summaries.


Public confirmation and release of the coroner’s report.


Detailed explanation of search methodology and coverage.


Documentation of all evidence collection and handling procedures.


Clarification regarding missing personal property.


Independent reinvestigation by an outside agency or oversight body.


📢 PUBLIC INTEREST AND ACCOUNTABILITY


This case extends beyond one individual.
It speaks to the integrity of investigative processes and public trust in institutional accountability.


When conclusions are presented without full explanation,
it creates doubt.


When questions remain unanswered,
it creates concern.


And when concern is ignored,
it demands action.

 


A case is not closed because it is labeled.
It is closed when the evidence is complete, the timeline is clear, and the facts withstand scrutiny.
At present, this case does not meet that standard.


We are standing on facts.
Damond Lazenby Jr. deserves a complete and accountable investigation.


Sign. Share. Get Active 

The Decision Makers

Gavin Newsom
California Governor
Diana Becton
Contra Costa County District Attorney

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates