It’s been one month today that the Board of Directors received a chilling account of Connolly’s actions by way of a letter from an employee. Yet NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN. Why won’t the board take action? Why is Connolly still allowed to make decisions on behalf of the college? Why is Connolly still allowed to still meddle in the day-to-day operations of the college, forcing employees to defend his actions? There is zero chance for a FAIR AND IMPARTIAL investigation.
DEMAND CHANGE NOW
In a recent article published in several newspapers that employees stating the following:
“During my short tenure as a staff member here at SCCC, Dr. Connolly has used his position to blackmail me with offers of a full-time faculty position in exchange for spying and reporting on my fellow co-workers ... . It was made very clear that I was meant to be an informant to ensure the surveillance state stayed strong and under his total control. In addition, Dr. Connolly once threatened to produce a falsified Title IX report in order to get me fired from my position under false accusations of my failure to follow proper procedure. This was the tactic used to course-correct his withering control over me as I continually attempted to find ways to come forward and do the right thing without losing my job. Dr. Connolly’s tactics sadly worked perfectly to his plan. Any member of my direct supervisory chain can corroborate the absolute falsity of this twisted and categorically fabricated charge. I also possess a signed affidavit from the (female) student involved in this imaginary incident stating that I both handled any and all issues in compliance with Title IX protocol and that the charge against me was obviously fabricated and false.”
Boehm also said Connolly demanded weekly reports on what elected officials, politically active community members and others were saying about his performance as SCCC president.
Connolly suggested recording conversations and continuously threatened Boehm with the loss of his job, knowing that his wife needed his employer-provided health care because of her pre-existing health conditions and high medical costs, Boehm said.
https://www.townshipjournal.com/