Here's what's new

We're making progress, and your support keeps us moving forward! Here's what's happened so far: FetLife just admitted in writing that their own CEO’s real name is public knowledge… yet they still locked an account for posting it on their platform. They claim the name is “personally identifying information” that cannot be shared without the CEO’s consent — even though that same name is freely available across the internet, business records, and public filings. Then they try to frame this as a neutral Terms of Use issue, not censorship. Let’s be clear: This isn’t about protecting a private individual. This is about a company punishing someone for pointing to publicly available information about its decision-maker on a platform they do not own https://c.org/Rdz929Nvzd If the name is already public, locking accounts over it isn’t “enforcing Terms.” It’s controlling the narrative.