Demand Accountability for Spain Visa Delays at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester and BLS
Demand Accountability for Spain Visa Delays at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester and BLS
The Issue
Petition title
Demand Accountability for Spain Visa Delays at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester and BLS International
Short summary
Applicants applying for Spanish Schengen visas through BLS International Manchester are reporting prolonged processing times, poor communication, and missed holidays despite making applications well in advance. Many face financial losses from non-refundable flights and hotels, alongside considerable stress and uncertainty. We demand transparency, timely decisions, better customer service, and accountability from both the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International.
Petition Description
Stop Unreasonable Spain Visa Delays in Manchester: Applicants Deserve Transparency, Accountability and Fair Treatment
We are calling on the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International Manchester to address the growing concerns surrounding delays in Spanish visa processing, inadequate communication, and the treatment of visa applicants.
Every year, thousands of people living in the United Kingdom apply for Spanish visas to visit Spain for holidays, family occasions, honeymoons, business trips, and other important commitments.
Applicants pay visa fees, arrange appointments, submit the required documents, provide their passports, and book flights and accommodation. Many make these arrangements months in advance and submit their applications believing that the published processing information will help them plan their journeys responsibly.
However, an increasing number of applicants are reporting experiences that raise serious questions about the transparency, efficiency, and accountability of the Spanish visa application process in Manchester.
People are missing their holidays, losing money, and experiencing unnecessary anxiety because their visa applications and passports are not being returned in time for their planned travel.
We believe applicants deserve clear information, reasonable processing times, accessible customer support, and fair treatment.
This petition seeks answers and meaningful action from both the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International Manchester.
1. Visa applications taking longer than the published processing period
The official BLS Manchester frequently asked questions page states that, in most cases, applicants are informed of the outcome within 15 calendar days. It also states that processing can take up to 45 days when a more detailed examination is necessary.
Source: BLS Manchester — Official Visa Processing FAQs
Despite this published information, applicants have publicly reported waiting for weeks without receiving a decision, including cases in which the planned travel date has already passed.
For example, a public Reddit discussion dated 8 October 2026 describes an applicant who reported waiting 56 calendar days after applying on 13 August, with the planned trip already missed and no meaningful update received.
Another public discussion, published on 15 October 2026, describes an applicant who reported that the application had reached the 45-day mark without a decision, eventually leading to the withdrawal of the application.
Sources:
Public discussion about Spain visa delays at BLS Manchester
Public account of a delayed BLS Manchester application
These are individual accounts rather than independently verified statistics. Nevertheless, they illustrate why applicants are asking for a clear explanation of the delays and an effective way to obtain information about their applications.
There is also a need for clarity because processing information varies across visa categories. Some BLS Manchester pages for short-stay visas refer to a period of six to eight weeks, while the general FAQs describe the usual 15-day period and the possibility of delays up to 45 days.
Applicants need clear, consistent information about which processing period applies to their visa category.
Our questions are straightforward:
Why are applicants reporting waits beyond the published 45-day period?
What is the current backlog of pending applications at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester?
Are applications being processed in a transparent and consistent manner?
What steps are being taken to resolve delays?
Why are applicants not receiving timely explanations when their applications exceed the stated processing period?
Applicants should not be left repeatedly checking their application status without knowing when they will receive a decision or their passport.
2. Financial losses caused by delayed visa decisions
A holiday is not simply a flight ticket.
People book hotels, airport transfers, car hire, excursions, travel insurance, and other services. Families may coordinate annual leave, children’s school holidays, and trips involving relatives travelling from different countries.
Couples may arrange honeymoons. Some applicants plan milestone birthday celebrations, anniversaries, or family reunions.
When a visa decision does not arrive before departure, these arrangements can fall apart.
Flights and accommodation may be non-refundable or subject to substantial cancellation charges. Even where a booking can be changed, the applicant may have to pay additional fees.
Applicants posting public reviews have described losing substantial sums because their passports remained with the visa application process beyond their intended travel dates.
One Google review reproduced on Wanderlog, dated 4 June 2026, describes an applicant who reported that a decision had not arrived before a planned departure and expressed concern about the financial consequences for a honeymoon.
Other public reviews describe delayed applications, missed travel dates, difficulty contacting customer support, and uncertainty about passport returns.
Source: Publicly reproduced Google reviews of BLS Spain Visa Application Centre Manchester
These reports highlight a serious practical problem: applicants bear the financial consequences of uncertainty even when they have submitted their applications and supporting documents in advance.
We recognise that visa decisions require appropriate checks and that not every application can be decided within the same timeframe. However, applicants should receive clear information about realistic processing expectations and meaningful assistance when delays threaten their travel plans.
We call on the Spanish Consulate to explain how it intends to address applications that remain pending beyond the applicable processing period.
We also call on BLS to ensure that applicants receive accurate information before paying for appointments and associated services.
3. The mental and emotional impact on applicants
The consequences of these delays extend beyond financial loss.
Applicants describe spending days and weeks worrying about whether they will receive their passports, whether their holidays will be cancelled, and whether they will lose money they cannot afford to replace.
The uncertainty can be particularly distressing for couples planning honeymoons, families travelling with children, and people arranging important events.
Repeatedly checking an application status that does not change, calling customer service without obtaining useful information, and sending unanswered emails can make an already difficult situation worse.
Public discussions and customer reviews concerning BLS Manchester include complaints about limited communication and difficulty obtaining meaningful updates.
Sources: Public applicant experiences on Reddit and BLS International customer reviews
Applicants should not have to spend their final days before a holiday in a state of uncertainty, wondering whether the trip they paid for will ever happen.
We ask the relevant authorities to recognise that timely communication is not an optional courtesy. It is an essential part of a reliable visa application service.
4. Lack of meaningful communication and customer support
Another recurring concern in public applicant accounts is the difficulty of obtaining clear answers.
Applicants report that their tracking status remains unchanged for extended periods. Some describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the application centre by telephone or email.
Others report being directed back to the consulate or receiving general responses that do not explain the status of their particular case.
We acknowledge that BLS and the Spanish Consulate have different responsibilities. BLS operates the application centre, while visa decisions are made by the Spanish authorities.
However, that distinction should not leave applicants without a practical route to assistance.
Applicants need to know:
Whether their applications have reached the consulate.
Whether additional documents are required.
Whether their applications are still within the applicable processing period.
What procedure to follow if the processing period has passed.
How to request the return of their passports if they decide to withdraw their applications.
Which authority is responsible for resolving their particular concern.
We call for a transparent escalation procedure, timely responses, and clear explanations whenever an application is delayed.
5. Concerns about BLS Manchester’s information and additional charges
Our concerns are not limited to the time taken by the consulate.
BLS International is responsible for the service applicants receive at the application centre, including the information provided before and during appointments and the handling of optional services.
Applicants have raised concerns about the following practices. We ask BLS to investigate these reports, clarify its policies, and publish clear explanations.
A. Inadequate disclosure of processing timelines
Applicants need realistic information before submitting their applications and paying associated fees.
Public reviews describe applicants being given one estimate before or during their appointments and subsequently discovering that processing could take substantially longer.
BLS’s published information also varies by visa category, making it especially important that applicants are directed to the correct and current guidance.
We ask BLS Manchester to:
Clearly display the applicable processing period for each visa category.
Prominently disclose known or significant backlogs before applicants attend appointments.
Explain that a visa decision is made by the consulate and that processing estimates are not guarantees.
Update its website promptly when published guidance changes.
Ensure staff provide consistent, accurate information when asked about expected processing times.
Applicants should be able to make informed decisions about whether to proceed with their travel arrangements.
B. Next-day courier charges and informed consent
BLS Manchester’s published additional-services page lists a next-day courier service for £29.99.
Source: BLS Manchester — Additional Services and Fees
Applicants have raised concerns about being charged for courier delivery without clearly understanding or expressly agreeing to the service.
We ask BLS to investigate these reports and confirm that next-day courier delivery is presented transparently as an optional paid service wherever applicable, with the price disclosed and the applicant’s consent obtained before any charge is made.
Applicants should receive an itemised receipt and a straightforward process for disputing charges they did not authorise.
We also ask BLS to explain how applicants can opt out of courier delivery and collect their passports instead, where collection is available.
No applicant should have to pay for an optional service without informed consent.
C. Photograph charges when applicants bring compliant photographs
BLS Manchester’s published guidance specifies the requirements for visa photographs and instructs applicants to provide a recent photograph meeting those requirements. The guidance also states that a photo booth is available at the centre.
Source: BLS Manchester — Visa Photograph Requirements
However, public customer reviews include allegations that applicants who brought their own photographs were nevertheless told to have their pictures taken at the centre and pay an additional charge.
For example, a Google review dated 25 January 2026, reproduced on Wanderlog, alleges that applicants were required to take photographs at the centre despite bringing photographs they believed met the published requirements.
A separate review dated 9 June 2026 indicates that clearer information about photographs taken on-site would have helped the applicant avoid unnecessary expense elsewhere.
Source: Publicly reproduced Google reviews of BLS Manchester
These are individual reports, and we ask BLS to clarify its actual procedures rather than assume that every allegation reflects standard practice.
We request that BLS:
Explain precisely when an applicant’s own photograph can be accepted.
Provide written reasons whenever a photograph is rejected.
Make clear whether taking a photograph at the centre is mandatory in any particular circumstance.
Disclose the applicable charge before taking a photograph.
Ensure applicants are not charged for a replacement photograph without a clear explanation and appropriate consent when their original photograph meets the published requirements.
Applicants should not have to pay for an additional service simply because the centre’s requirements or procedures were not clearly explained.
6. Who is accountable: BLS or the Spanish Consulate?
Applicants are frequently caught between two organisations.
The Spanish Consulate General in Manchester is responsible for visa decisions. BLS International provides the application-centre service and explains on its website that it is not responsible for the consulate’s processing decisions.
Source: BLS Manchester — Official Disclaimer
We recognise that BLS cannot independently grant a visa or dictate the outcome of a consular decision.
However, this does not remove the need for the consulate to explain delays in decision-making or the need for BLS to provide accurate information, transparent charges, and effective customer service.
We therefore call on both organisations to respond publicly to these concerns and explain what action they will take within their respective responsibilities.
The Spanish Consulate should address processing delays and the handling of pending applications.
BLS should address the information supplied to applicants, the service provided at its centre, additional charges, and the procedures for raising complaints.
Applicants should not be left to navigate the problem alone simply because the two organisations perform different roles.
What We Demand
We, the undersigned, call for the following actions.
From the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester
1. A public explanation of the delays
Publish an explanation of the reasons for prolonged processing times and clarify which processing periods currently apply to different visa categories.
2. Action on overdue applications
Review applications that have exceeded the applicable processing period and take appropriate steps to resolve outstanding cases as promptly as possible.
3. Transparent processing information
Provide regularly updated information about backlogs and realistic processing expectations, particularly during periods of high demand.
4. A meaningful escalation process
Establish a clear process for applicants whose applications remain pending beyond the applicable timeframe, particularly where imminent travel or the return of a passport is at issue.
5. Better communication
Provide accessible guidance explaining how applicants can raise concerns, submit relevant updates, and obtain assistance with overdue applications.
6. An explanation of accountability
Clarify what measures the consulate is taking to prevent avoidable delays and how applicants can seek review or redress where appropriate.
From BLS International Manchester
7. Honest and consistent processing information
Clearly communicate the applicable processing periods and prominently disclose known delays so applicants can make informed decisions.
8. Transparent optional charges
Ensure that courier delivery, photography, and other additional services are clearly explained, correctly priced, and charged only in accordance with the applicant’s informed consent.
9. Fair treatment regarding photographs
Clarify the circumstances in which applicant-provided photographs are accepted or rejected, and explain any rejection before charging for a replacement.
10. Effective customer support
Provide a reliable complaint-handling and escalation process, with timely responses and clear information about which organisation is responsible for resolving each issue.
11. Accountability for service complaints
Investigate complaints about unauthorised charges, inconsistent information, and the treatment of applicants, and provide a clear route for obtaining a resolution.
From the relevant Spanish and UK authorities
12. Independent scrutiny where appropriate
Examine whether the reported problems warrant a formal review of visa processing arrangements, application-centre service standards, and complaint-handling procedures.
13. Fair treatment for affected applicants
Clarify what remedies may be available to applicants who experience financial loss or other harm and identify the appropriate channels for pursuing complaints or claims.
Why Your Signature Matters
A single applicant may struggle to obtain a satisfactory answer.
When hundreds or thousands of affected applicants document their experiences and raise their concerns together, it becomes easier to identify recurring problems and ask for meaningful explanations.
If you have applied for a Spanish visa through BLS Manchester and experienced prolonged delays, missed travel dates, difficulty obtaining updates, unexpected charges, or problems with the handling of your photographs, consider supporting this petition.
You can also help by sharing a factual account of your experience, including your application date, planned travel date, the length of the delay, attempts to obtain updates, and any documented financial losses.
Please avoid publishing passport numbers, application reference numbers, home addresses, or other sensitive personal information.
We are not asking for visas to be granted automatically, nor are we asking for necessary security checks to be bypassed.
We are asking for timely decisions, transparent procedures, honest communication, fair charges, and accountability.
People who apply for visas should not be left in prolonged uncertainty without meaningful information about their applications.
A visa application process must respect both the requirements of the authorities and the legitimate interests of the people who rely on it.
Our message is simple:
Stop leaving applicants in uncertainty. Stop allowing preventable communication failures to compound the consequences of delays. Give applicants clear answers and take responsibility for the services you provide.
We urge the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester, BLS International Manchester, and the relevant authorities to listen to affected applicants and take meaningful action.
Please sign and share this petition to help bring these concerns to the attention of those responsible.
119
The Issue
Petition title
Demand Accountability for Spain Visa Delays at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester and BLS International
Short summary
Applicants applying for Spanish Schengen visas through BLS International Manchester are reporting prolonged processing times, poor communication, and missed holidays despite making applications well in advance. Many face financial losses from non-refundable flights and hotels, alongside considerable stress and uncertainty. We demand transparency, timely decisions, better customer service, and accountability from both the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International.
Petition Description
Stop Unreasonable Spain Visa Delays in Manchester: Applicants Deserve Transparency, Accountability and Fair Treatment
We are calling on the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International Manchester to address the growing concerns surrounding delays in Spanish visa processing, inadequate communication, and the treatment of visa applicants.
Every year, thousands of people living in the United Kingdom apply for Spanish visas to visit Spain for holidays, family occasions, honeymoons, business trips, and other important commitments.
Applicants pay visa fees, arrange appointments, submit the required documents, provide their passports, and book flights and accommodation. Many make these arrangements months in advance and submit their applications believing that the published processing information will help them plan their journeys responsibly.
However, an increasing number of applicants are reporting experiences that raise serious questions about the transparency, efficiency, and accountability of the Spanish visa application process in Manchester.
People are missing their holidays, losing money, and experiencing unnecessary anxiety because their visa applications and passports are not being returned in time for their planned travel.
We believe applicants deserve clear information, reasonable processing times, accessible customer support, and fair treatment.
This petition seeks answers and meaningful action from both the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester and BLS International Manchester.
1. Visa applications taking longer than the published processing period
The official BLS Manchester frequently asked questions page states that, in most cases, applicants are informed of the outcome within 15 calendar days. It also states that processing can take up to 45 days when a more detailed examination is necessary.
Source: BLS Manchester — Official Visa Processing FAQs
Despite this published information, applicants have publicly reported waiting for weeks without receiving a decision, including cases in which the planned travel date has already passed.
For example, a public Reddit discussion dated 8 October 2026 describes an applicant who reported waiting 56 calendar days after applying on 13 August, with the planned trip already missed and no meaningful update received.
Another public discussion, published on 15 October 2026, describes an applicant who reported that the application had reached the 45-day mark without a decision, eventually leading to the withdrawal of the application.
Sources:
Public discussion about Spain visa delays at BLS Manchester
Public account of a delayed BLS Manchester application
These are individual accounts rather than independently verified statistics. Nevertheless, they illustrate why applicants are asking for a clear explanation of the delays and an effective way to obtain information about their applications.
There is also a need for clarity because processing information varies across visa categories. Some BLS Manchester pages for short-stay visas refer to a period of six to eight weeks, while the general FAQs describe the usual 15-day period and the possibility of delays up to 45 days.
Applicants need clear, consistent information about which processing period applies to their visa category.
Our questions are straightforward:
Why are applicants reporting waits beyond the published 45-day period?
What is the current backlog of pending applications at the Spanish Consulate in Manchester?
Are applications being processed in a transparent and consistent manner?
What steps are being taken to resolve delays?
Why are applicants not receiving timely explanations when their applications exceed the stated processing period?
Applicants should not be left repeatedly checking their application status without knowing when they will receive a decision or their passport.
2. Financial losses caused by delayed visa decisions
A holiday is not simply a flight ticket.
People book hotels, airport transfers, car hire, excursions, travel insurance, and other services. Families may coordinate annual leave, children’s school holidays, and trips involving relatives travelling from different countries.
Couples may arrange honeymoons. Some applicants plan milestone birthday celebrations, anniversaries, or family reunions.
When a visa decision does not arrive before departure, these arrangements can fall apart.
Flights and accommodation may be non-refundable or subject to substantial cancellation charges. Even where a booking can be changed, the applicant may have to pay additional fees.
Applicants posting public reviews have described losing substantial sums because their passports remained with the visa application process beyond their intended travel dates.
One Google review reproduced on Wanderlog, dated 4 June 2026, describes an applicant who reported that a decision had not arrived before a planned departure and expressed concern about the financial consequences for a honeymoon.
Other public reviews describe delayed applications, missed travel dates, difficulty contacting customer support, and uncertainty about passport returns.
Source: Publicly reproduced Google reviews of BLS Spain Visa Application Centre Manchester
These reports highlight a serious practical problem: applicants bear the financial consequences of uncertainty even when they have submitted their applications and supporting documents in advance.
We recognise that visa decisions require appropriate checks and that not every application can be decided within the same timeframe. However, applicants should receive clear information about realistic processing expectations and meaningful assistance when delays threaten their travel plans.
We call on the Spanish Consulate to explain how it intends to address applications that remain pending beyond the applicable processing period.
We also call on BLS to ensure that applicants receive accurate information before paying for appointments and associated services.
3. The mental and emotional impact on applicants
The consequences of these delays extend beyond financial loss.
Applicants describe spending days and weeks worrying about whether they will receive their passports, whether their holidays will be cancelled, and whether they will lose money they cannot afford to replace.
The uncertainty can be particularly distressing for couples planning honeymoons, families travelling with children, and people arranging important events.
Repeatedly checking an application status that does not change, calling customer service without obtaining useful information, and sending unanswered emails can make an already difficult situation worse.
Public discussions and customer reviews concerning BLS Manchester include complaints about limited communication and difficulty obtaining meaningful updates.
Sources: Public applicant experiences on Reddit and BLS International customer reviews
Applicants should not have to spend their final days before a holiday in a state of uncertainty, wondering whether the trip they paid for will ever happen.
We ask the relevant authorities to recognise that timely communication is not an optional courtesy. It is an essential part of a reliable visa application service.
4. Lack of meaningful communication and customer support
Another recurring concern in public applicant accounts is the difficulty of obtaining clear answers.
Applicants report that their tracking status remains unchanged for extended periods. Some describe unsuccessful attempts to contact the application centre by telephone or email.
Others report being directed back to the consulate or receiving general responses that do not explain the status of their particular case.
We acknowledge that BLS and the Spanish Consulate have different responsibilities. BLS operates the application centre, while visa decisions are made by the Spanish authorities.
However, that distinction should not leave applicants without a practical route to assistance.
Applicants need to know:
Whether their applications have reached the consulate.
Whether additional documents are required.
Whether their applications are still within the applicable processing period.
What procedure to follow if the processing period has passed.
How to request the return of their passports if they decide to withdraw their applications.
Which authority is responsible for resolving their particular concern.
We call for a transparent escalation procedure, timely responses, and clear explanations whenever an application is delayed.
5. Concerns about BLS Manchester’s information and additional charges
Our concerns are not limited to the time taken by the consulate.
BLS International is responsible for the service applicants receive at the application centre, including the information provided before and during appointments and the handling of optional services.
Applicants have raised concerns about the following practices. We ask BLS to investigate these reports, clarify its policies, and publish clear explanations.
A. Inadequate disclosure of processing timelines
Applicants need realistic information before submitting their applications and paying associated fees.
Public reviews describe applicants being given one estimate before or during their appointments and subsequently discovering that processing could take substantially longer.
BLS’s published information also varies by visa category, making it especially important that applicants are directed to the correct and current guidance.
We ask BLS Manchester to:
Clearly display the applicable processing period for each visa category.
Prominently disclose known or significant backlogs before applicants attend appointments.
Explain that a visa decision is made by the consulate and that processing estimates are not guarantees.
Update its website promptly when published guidance changes.
Ensure staff provide consistent, accurate information when asked about expected processing times.
Applicants should be able to make informed decisions about whether to proceed with their travel arrangements.
B. Next-day courier charges and informed consent
BLS Manchester’s published additional-services page lists a next-day courier service for £29.99.
Source: BLS Manchester — Additional Services and Fees
Applicants have raised concerns about being charged for courier delivery without clearly understanding or expressly agreeing to the service.
We ask BLS to investigate these reports and confirm that next-day courier delivery is presented transparently as an optional paid service wherever applicable, with the price disclosed and the applicant’s consent obtained before any charge is made.
Applicants should receive an itemised receipt and a straightforward process for disputing charges they did not authorise.
We also ask BLS to explain how applicants can opt out of courier delivery and collect their passports instead, where collection is available.
No applicant should have to pay for an optional service without informed consent.
C. Photograph charges when applicants bring compliant photographs
BLS Manchester’s published guidance specifies the requirements for visa photographs and instructs applicants to provide a recent photograph meeting those requirements. The guidance also states that a photo booth is available at the centre.
Source: BLS Manchester — Visa Photograph Requirements
However, public customer reviews include allegations that applicants who brought their own photographs were nevertheless told to have their pictures taken at the centre and pay an additional charge.
For example, a Google review dated 25 January 2026, reproduced on Wanderlog, alleges that applicants were required to take photographs at the centre despite bringing photographs they believed met the published requirements.
A separate review dated 9 June 2026 indicates that clearer information about photographs taken on-site would have helped the applicant avoid unnecessary expense elsewhere.
Source: Publicly reproduced Google reviews of BLS Manchester
These are individual reports, and we ask BLS to clarify its actual procedures rather than assume that every allegation reflects standard practice.
We request that BLS:
Explain precisely when an applicant’s own photograph can be accepted.
Provide written reasons whenever a photograph is rejected.
Make clear whether taking a photograph at the centre is mandatory in any particular circumstance.
Disclose the applicable charge before taking a photograph.
Ensure applicants are not charged for a replacement photograph without a clear explanation and appropriate consent when their original photograph meets the published requirements.
Applicants should not have to pay for an additional service simply because the centre’s requirements or procedures were not clearly explained.
6. Who is accountable: BLS or the Spanish Consulate?
Applicants are frequently caught between two organisations.
The Spanish Consulate General in Manchester is responsible for visa decisions. BLS International provides the application-centre service and explains on its website that it is not responsible for the consulate’s processing decisions.
Source: BLS Manchester — Official Disclaimer
We recognise that BLS cannot independently grant a visa or dictate the outcome of a consular decision.
However, this does not remove the need for the consulate to explain delays in decision-making or the need for BLS to provide accurate information, transparent charges, and effective customer service.
We therefore call on both organisations to respond publicly to these concerns and explain what action they will take within their respective responsibilities.
The Spanish Consulate should address processing delays and the handling of pending applications.
BLS should address the information supplied to applicants, the service provided at its centre, additional charges, and the procedures for raising complaints.
Applicants should not be left to navigate the problem alone simply because the two organisations perform different roles.
What We Demand
We, the undersigned, call for the following actions.
From the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester
1. A public explanation of the delays
Publish an explanation of the reasons for prolonged processing times and clarify which processing periods currently apply to different visa categories.
2. Action on overdue applications
Review applications that have exceeded the applicable processing period and take appropriate steps to resolve outstanding cases as promptly as possible.
3. Transparent processing information
Provide regularly updated information about backlogs and realistic processing expectations, particularly during periods of high demand.
4. A meaningful escalation process
Establish a clear process for applicants whose applications remain pending beyond the applicable timeframe, particularly where imminent travel or the return of a passport is at issue.
5. Better communication
Provide accessible guidance explaining how applicants can raise concerns, submit relevant updates, and obtain assistance with overdue applications.
6. An explanation of accountability
Clarify what measures the consulate is taking to prevent avoidable delays and how applicants can seek review or redress where appropriate.
From BLS International Manchester
7. Honest and consistent processing information
Clearly communicate the applicable processing periods and prominently disclose known delays so applicants can make informed decisions.
8. Transparent optional charges
Ensure that courier delivery, photography, and other additional services are clearly explained, correctly priced, and charged only in accordance with the applicant’s informed consent.
9. Fair treatment regarding photographs
Clarify the circumstances in which applicant-provided photographs are accepted or rejected, and explain any rejection before charging for a replacement.
10. Effective customer support
Provide a reliable complaint-handling and escalation process, with timely responses and clear information about which organisation is responsible for resolving each issue.
11. Accountability for service complaints
Investigate complaints about unauthorised charges, inconsistent information, and the treatment of applicants, and provide a clear route for obtaining a resolution.
From the relevant Spanish and UK authorities
12. Independent scrutiny where appropriate
Examine whether the reported problems warrant a formal review of visa processing arrangements, application-centre service standards, and complaint-handling procedures.
13. Fair treatment for affected applicants
Clarify what remedies may be available to applicants who experience financial loss or other harm and identify the appropriate channels for pursuing complaints or claims.
Why Your Signature Matters
A single applicant may struggle to obtain a satisfactory answer.
When hundreds or thousands of affected applicants document their experiences and raise their concerns together, it becomes easier to identify recurring problems and ask for meaningful explanations.
If you have applied for a Spanish visa through BLS Manchester and experienced prolonged delays, missed travel dates, difficulty obtaining updates, unexpected charges, or problems with the handling of your photographs, consider supporting this petition.
You can also help by sharing a factual account of your experience, including your application date, planned travel date, the length of the delay, attempts to obtain updates, and any documented financial losses.
Please avoid publishing passport numbers, application reference numbers, home addresses, or other sensitive personal information.
We are not asking for visas to be granted automatically, nor are we asking for necessary security checks to be bypassed.
We are asking for timely decisions, transparent procedures, honest communication, fair charges, and accountability.
People who apply for visas should not be left in prolonged uncertainty without meaningful information about their applications.
A visa application process must respect both the requirements of the authorities and the legitimate interests of the people who rely on it.
Our message is simple:
Stop leaving applicants in uncertainty. Stop allowing preventable communication failures to compound the consequences of delays. Give applicants clear answers and take responsibility for the services you provide.
We urge the Spanish Consulate General in Manchester, BLS International Manchester, and the relevant authorities to listen to affected applicants and take meaningful action.
Please sign and share this petition to help bring these concerns to the attention of those responsible.
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 19 October 2026