17 Haz 2015
Id like to clear up any confusion surrounding our intent with this notice. Our intent is to affirm our British Constitution and the inalienable common law rights and freedoms we had won via our ancestors over the last 800 years. The difference between those rights and those of the ECHR, or the HRA is that ,as we are witnessing, those rights given by the state are, and have always been revocable. It was always an act of treason that took us into the EU and the ECHR, they have been successfully eroding own rule of law over the past decades, and now we all believe we have more rights with the HRA, but in fact the HRA replaces inalienable rights with granted rights which can then be revoked...so it gives us less than what we already have under the common law. Our intent is to restore our own rule of law, which is in truth a confirmation of inalienable rights, that the government cannot lawfully tamper with. We are in a state of lawful rebellion, and the Crown has no jurisdiction at this time to people who adhere to the common law tenet of Article 61.
Bağlantıyı kopyala
WhatsApp
Facebook
X
E-posta