Three updates...

1) I have now been diagnosed with a pretentiously cancerous condition, the doctors attribute this to the prolonged and sustained periods of stress over the last three years.

I have reported this to the officer in the case, but this has been ignored. Will be allowed to include a personal injury claim against them, I wonder.... I have a report on file from over two years ago in which a psychologist literally Included in his recommendations that It was unsafe for the police to keep exposing me to anxiety or stress.

2) I had a seizure while calling 999 following another ambush verbal attack. The call handler called both the ambulance and the local first responders.

The officers who arrived were considerate and understanding but unable to do anything. However I recorded in my log  'They were concerned that reports they had read before attending indicated that [the perpetrator] was allegedly in fear of his life from me and concluded looking at the video that that must be a fairy tale (my interpretation, they actually said it was wholly inconsistent for someone in fear of their lives to go on the attack in that way).'

What this means is that an officer must have repeated the private call 101 to my perpetrator as a serious threat, because how else would the aggressor have known to allege that threat was something he could exploit, given that the guy supposedly in fear was not present during my private phone call with a 101 operator, and had no way of knowing what was said to whom so, how can he claim to be affected by something to which he had no knowledge????....

That fictitious allegation is still sitting on my record, colouring the approach of any officers to me when I make a complaint and its effectively making remedy impossible.

3) Last week I received the news that of the 6 charges put to the CPS against my perpetrator. 3 have been knocked back because they were for malicious damage it items amounting to less than £5,000 and the events were more than 6 months old! As it took the police 3 months or more to submit these, and the CPS takes more then 3 months to consider cases, this is effectively a free pass for those who commit minor malicious damage. Nobody told us this was possible!

Two charges are being prosecuted but with the prospect of only a CPO outcome (Public order and Assault).

The sixth charge, stalking and harassment, was also knocked back partly for, according to the officer in the case who just happens have gone to school with perpetrator, "lack of proof" (despite over 600 videos conclusively evidencing my claims of ongoing stalking and harressment) but also supposedly because of my attempts to defend my self being reinterpreted as provocation after the fact....