This is literally the most confusing email I have ever received...

This reminds me of a an episode of taskmaster....From series 12, make and wear a popcorn necklace with at least five pieces of popcorn and then do the opposite of the following:

"You must under no circumstances not avoid not making the bell not ring."

The task is over when you have either rung the bell or not rung the bell and said 'I did the right thing' three times. Fastest to not do the wrong thing wins. If you don't do the right thing, you lose five points.

So why ask you all....What do you think this actually means? 

From: Incompetent.idiot@met.police.uk
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2024 9:53 AM
To: me@outlook.com
Subject: Case update

"Dear N

I am writing to apprise you of the following facts

The stalking case in relation to M has been reviewed by an acting detective inspector who has judged it is not suitable for no further action or a police decision, he has thus referred it for a Crown Prosecution Service charging decision.

It has been sent to them and there should be some kind of communication from them within 28 days.

That communication is likely to be an authorised charge, a rejected charge, or a request for changes to the case file.

Their adherence to this process is somewhat contingent on their workload, so there may be a need to chase if I don’t hear from them.

Furthermore, while I remain OIC for this matter and will update as appropriate, I have transferred to Pollards Hill SNT.

This means I will not be involved in future matters in this dispute, solely this completed case file. Any further issues will need to be managed by the local Morden SNT.

.....

Yours,

David"

Calling this strangled language is being very generous... So what do you all think? 

 I do not know what he is trying to say....

But I do know is that what is been suggested here is completely improper, the first tests that must be applied before presenting a case for crown prosecution by his own admission, has not been met.