The Ask
We're asking the City to install artificial or natural turf, at Bill Johnston Dog Park at 65 Western Battery Road in Liberty Village, instead of wood chips as the ground surface.

Where Things Stand
We want to start by acknowledging the City's recent decision to move away from the current gravel surface and replace it with wood chips. That's a real step in the right direction, and we appreciate that the City is listening to community concerns and investing in this space.

But we believe turf is the better long-term choice, and we're asking the City to reconsider before the work is finalized.

Why many dog owners prefer turf

• Dogs stay much cleaner after rain.
• No wood chips stuck in paws or fur.
• Easier to spot and remove waste.
• Fewer holes from digging.
• Better year-round usability.

Problems with wood chips

• Many dogs chew or eat them.
• Splinters can injure paws or mouths.
• They scatter outside the park.
• They decompose into dusty or muddy material.
• They need regular replenishment, which adds ongoing cost.

The downside of turf

• It can get hotter in direct sun during summer.
• Initial installation costs more.
• It must be installed correctly with proper drainage and infill to prevent odors. 

*Regardless of what substrate the City intends to use, the second highest priority is to add shade to the park

What Ontario municipalities say

The City of Toronto's Off-Leash Area Design Guidelines note:

Artificial (K9) turf

• Excellent drainage
• Durable
• Easy to clean
• Accessible
• Main drawbacks are higher cost and heat in summer. 

Engineered wood chips 

• Difficult to clean
• Degrade over time
• Require regular maintenance and annual top-ups
• Can develop odour problems.
   

Looking at the long term

While turf is more expensive to install, many municipalities find that reduced maintenance and replacement costs make it competitive over its lifespan.

• Improved safety: Reduces the risk of dogs ingesting wood chips or getting splinters.
• Lower maintenance: No constant replenishment of wood chips.
• Cleaner environment: Less mud, dust, and debris tracked into surrounding areas.
• Accessibility: Easier for seniors, people using mobility aids, and older dogs.
• Proven success: Parks that have switched to turf often receive positive feedback from users because the parks stay cleaner and are more usable throughout the year.

What We're Asking For

Pause or revisit the current wood chip installation plan.
Conduct a cost comparison of turf vs. wood chips over a 5–10 year horizon (installation + maintenance).

Sign This Petition
If you agree that Bill Johnston Dog Park deserves a safer, more accessible, and more durable surface, please add your name below.

 
Helga AuYeung, Liberty Village Resident and Owner of Liberty Pooch Pet Services