Kampanya güncellemesiSHAMSHABAD LAND HIJACKING - REAL ESTATE FRAUDS - 71 NHRC DIRECTIONS TO TELANGANA GOVT.CONSEQUENCES ARISES AFTER DOUBLE/BOGUS /MISREPRESENTED/WRONG SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY /FRAUDULENT REGIST
Raju GajulaHYDERABAD, Hindistan
8 Haz 2017
1) The above type of Registrations will take place on account of Rule 58 of Registration Act. 2) Mostly such registrations are double and overriding registrations either to grab/theft/hijack the properties and settle the matter for illegal gains by the Muscle men/Political Leaders. It is One of the Process to take Undue advantage by anti social elements. 3) Bogus/misrepresentated/wrong schedule of properties/ thrid party properties including government properties registration are out of provisions of Registration Act. Hence it is a illegal documents and such illegal documents are valid in the court of law till final judgement . 4) Wrong application of AP PBB Act to the Plotted land without jurisdiction (violation of provisions of laws, illegal and unconstitutional) by intelligent IAS officer, Collectors, Revenue Divisional Officers and Tahsildhars causing great harm to the public based on such wrong schedule of property documents without provisions of Conversion of Plotted land into Agricultural land ( There is no such conversion act of Plotted Land into Agricultural land). 5) Grabbing of Roads, Parks and other Public areas formed at the time of Layout through the process of misrepresented as agicultural land registration and in this regard Gram Panchayat office colluded with grabbers. 6) Double registrations document preventing genuine owner from enjoyment through Police till the fake document got cancelled through the process of civil court. During this process weak and genuine person bound for out of court settlement without any gain. 7) Second and subsequent registrant will always use political and police influence for unlawful gain in the form of settlement and mostly such registrant will utilize the time period and process of Civil Court from filing petition to final Judgement around ten years. 8) Law abiding and common man cannot spare time for civil court and expenses as one has to see livelihood and employment and every common man give priority for peace. Hence victims of double registrations will mostly loose properties. 9) Most of the double registrations treated as Civil Title Dispute in court of law either end with infructuous or out of court settlement due to delay process of court. 10) Government safeguard its own land by taking action in the form of Criminal case whereas common man had asked to take action under section 82 & 83 for registering invisible land confirmed by Tahsildar. which is still pending. Police is also supporting Fraudlent claimaints. 11) It is surprise to note registration department allowing registrations of plot numbers with same number in the same layout of same survery number, when asked about this under RTI enquiry simply informed boundaries are different. Hence it can be allowed with same plot number and it is different. As per General procedure of Sanctioning Layout by any Authority how it can be same plot numbers in the same layout.This is nothing but malafide intentions of such executants.For such criminal conspiracy registrations, through enquiry to be done by CBI as local police simply termed it as Civil case. 12) Comman man PMO GRIENVANCES are pending for further action in the office of principal revenue secretary to government, excise section U.O.Note no.1390/PAGB/2017 ,DATED:04/02/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.1008/PAGB/2017-4 DATED:17/02/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.1465/PAGB/2016-1 DATED 16-12-2016 U.O.NOTE NO.848/PAGB /2017-1 DATED:27/01/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.3176/PAGB/2017-1 DATED:01/04/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.15506/PAGB/2016-2 DATED:30/12/2016 U.O.NOTE NO.1008/PAGB/2017-2 DATED:01/02/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.931/PAGB/2017-1 DATED:01/02/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.1043/PAGB/2017-1 DATED 01/02/2017 U.O.NOTE NO.1228/PAGB/2017-2 DATED:02/02/2017 13) All the Sale Deeds, General Power of Attorney, such as AGPA,SPA and AGPA with Possession which are to be registered under Indian Registration Act,1908 must contain one paragraph of Cr.P.C stating that parties to document are liable to punishment if they found causing harm /damage to third parties or in between themselves on account of false statement/misrepresentation/wrong property schedule/ overriding registration/ third party property registration/Government property registration/forgery/ cheating / second time registration and all such act in relation to property grabbing will be prosecuted under IPC 420,447,448,120B,378 etc.The above self sworn statement in registered documents will reduce Civil disputes in Court and also Criminal Activities of land grabbing. Police will book Criminal case for prosecution. Utimately Criminal Court will decide the nature of dispute. Most of the land disputes cases are pending in Civil Courts, High Courts and Supreme Court despite land disputes cases are Criminal in nature on account of Trespass/Forgery/misrepresented property registration. Due to Land dispute in Civil Courts despite criminal in nature, Indian citizen spending their life time for Justice along with life time disease and mental agony. Hence there must be change/amendment in Registration Act, 1908 through ordinance/ bill in State Assemblies/ Parliament of India 14) TAMILNADU GOVERNMENT PASSED CIRCULAR ON BOGUS/FRAUD REGISTRATIONS CANCELLATION BASED ON ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT 15) inspite of Plots Representation, Petitions and Impleading petitions vide file No.D1/5586/2006 dated:08-12-2006 which kept in Cold Storage without disposal by violating Article 14 of Constitution and adopted, encouraged and Passed Orders in file No.D1/4725/2010, File No.D1/1682/2012 & D1/2724/2012 on bogus and invisible Properties which not only caused serious damage to the Plot owners but also waste of Public taxed money and precious IAS officers time. These Intelligent IAS Officers are Sri. C.Sudharshan Reddy and Smt. Amrapali Kata . It is a process of Cheating by Government Servants to Plot Owners and to help Land grabbers to grab the property of plot owners in the guise of bogus revenue records. Similarly in the Revenue Divisional Office, Chevella vide our Plot Owners file No.C/1064/2007, dated:12-04-2007 kept pending till the disposal of file No.C/196/2009 on dated:5-5-2010 only after wrong application of AP ROR Act to the Plots which caused damage to the Plot Owners apart from helping Land Grabbers These Order in file No.C/196/2009 on dated05-05-2010 passed by Sri. B V Ratna Kumar, Spl. Grade Deputy Collector & Revenue Divisional Officer. 16) Revenue officials never brother about the correction of revenue records inspite of their notice from the higher officials, court and also 4(2) of the RoR Act. If any mistake/violations done by lower lever officers,then higher officials including collector are not having powers to take corrective action by advising the victim to seek for justice in the court of law. 17) Registration Department are unable to collect the Deficit Stamp Duty as ordered by the Government of Telangana.
Hemen destekle
Bu kampanyayı imzala
Bağlantıyı kopyala
WhatsApp
Facebook
X
E-posta