Sent this to all the attorneys against us
to shawn, agoad, cpaek, nhuppert, rsaenz, dportnoi, msimeone, earias, smorrison, sagarwal Good morning. I am authoring this email as an invitation to connect and dialogue in re: California Senate Bill #132. I believe in the ideal behind SB132. I would never seek, or participate in, a repeal of that Bill: however, it will be rewritten. California Senate Bill 132 was` poorly written and violates many rules of proper grammar and syntax construction and execution. SB132 was palpably rushed from draft-to-legislation which is easily proven by the fact it violates many already existing laws, and CCR rules and regulations, overlooked and/or ignored (with deliberate indifference) by the state legislature of California. iniSB132 needs to be re-written because in its current condition it violates several pre-existing state laws, and, most importantly, it violates pre-existing Federal laws and mandates. SB132 violates the Constitution of the United States. No matter how your (offensive or defensive) litigation goes down here, in the lower courts, know this: The United States Supreme Court in its current state has begun ruling on cases consistent with the US Constitution, whether people agree or disagree (Besides, don't all of us Jailhouse lawyers and Credentialed lawyers dream of the day we can stand before that most Supreme court of all courts and argue a case?) I am currently an active Declarant in the case of Chandler Vs CDCR. The extent of my involvement is not in political or philosophical agreement with any group or person. I have been in prison for 35 years and I hate everybody, and my spirit died a long time ago! I seek Justice and equality restoration as my motive for helping your opposition's position. Nothing is ever what it seems. I am a credentialed PREA subject matter expert. I am the author of the PREA Peer education curriculum for the State of California, and its jails and prisons. And, FYI, PREA applies to more than just the LGBT communities. The Violations of many standards of PREA in the authorship of SB132, and its execution does raise a Constitutional question that under federal law and the rules for civil procedure and due process will be of great interest when it reaches the Supreme Court. And it will. I know what it means to be in it for the long haul. Keep in mind, PREA began in the oval office with George W. Bush 2002-2003; was ratified by the Obama administration in 2012. Therefore, US President Joe Biden has an obligation to enforce PREA, in its entirety, and to this day he is guilty of a "failure to protect" all incarcerated persons, except for those who are LGBT. a sign "The Buck Stops Here" was on President Truman's desk in his White House office. Biden cannot invoke qualified immunity in a failure to enforce an unrepealed mandate from the oval office. This is more than a hint to my next pro se move. It's only a 400.00 filing fee and stating a "cognizable claim upon which relief can be granted." I implore you to work with me to quell the legal fighting that could leave waste to so many potentially good things. You are good people, but so are they. Act like it. Working "together" is the only way to show the world what it can be.... In Norsworthy Vs Beard my fight concerned the fact everyone that wasn't trans was getting medical care consistent with their individualized needs; meanwhile, trans-prisoners were getting nothing. I simply wanted to raise trans inmate medical treatment to "equal" that of non-trans inmate medical treatment. I did not intend to stomp on the rights of others and leave only my rights standing! You may scoff at or nonchalantly wave off lawsuits lodged against SB132, but make no mistake, there are two outstanding Constitutional questions that can only be addressed through the discovery process. If nothing else, the ninth circuit will see those questions, for I am relentless.... With this email I offer input through a TEAMS or ZOOM meeting, to show you what flaws need to be corrected which will satisfy the contentions for and against SB132 and solidify SB132 as a functional IDEAL in practical application. In conclusion, I was raised in Prison, and have lived in the male and female designated systems of the CDCR. I was there, at CCWF, when SB132 was rolled out. I know the WHOLE story, while most only know the aspects that mean something to them, personally. I have all the transcripts, testimonies, and documented historical facts that moved the legislature to act so abruptly to pass SB132. But what most don't know, is I know what happened behind the scenes.... Respectfully Submitted Michelle-Lael Norsworthy PS Current litigation for trans rights see Norsworthy vs Allison No. 1:20-cv-00813-DAD-HBK and don't think the 2021 new CDCR gender guide, replacing the May 2015 guide, was produced for any other reason than my new and highly active case concerning post operative care Reminder: One month after my April 2015 Victory in May 2015 a new CDCR Gender Guide was produced. Make no mistake, my actions lead to change. Michellelael Norsworthy Fri, Jul 8, 11:57 AM (2 days ago) Changed my mind...let this be part of Discovery...