Beyond the Verdict: Media Under Scrutiny-The Court of Public Misinformation
Beyond the Verdict: Media Under Scrutiny-The Court of Public Misinformation
The Issue
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Office of Public Integrity
Washington, D.C. 20530
Date:
July 13, 2025
From:
Black Men United
InnocentBlackMenUnited@gmail.com
Subject: Urgent Request for Investigation into Defamation, Jury Tampering, and Violations of Federal Law by Jacquelin McKinney (Tisa Tells)
Introduction:
This formal complaint addresses the grave and continuing misconduct of Jacquelin McKinney, known publicly by her online alias, Tisa Tells. McKinney has systematically engaged in defamation, jury tampering, and the violation of social media platform Terms of Service, causing irreparable harm to individuals, families, communities, and the judicial system. McKinney's actions have reached far beyond simple defamation and have escalated into a coordinated attempt to undermine the integrity of legal proceedings and public perception of Black men in the United States and around the world.
We urge the U.S. Department of Justice to take immediate and decisive action to investigate these serious allegations, as they involve significant breaches of civil rights, defamation laws, and judicial misconduct.
Summary of Allegations:
Defamation and Media Manipulation:
Defamation of Black Men: Jacquelin McKinney, under the alias Tisa Tells, has propagated false and defamatory statements about Black men, systematically damaging their reputations and causing widespread emotional and societal harm. These defamatory remarks are not isolated but are part of a broader pattern of false accusations and racial stereotypes. McKinney's content has fueled harmful, racially motivated narratives, painting innocent Black men as inherently violent and dangerous.
Involvement in Media Manipulation:
McKinney’s content has been amplified through media channels and her substantial social media following. With her platform, McKinney has used a mixture of misinformation and inflammatory content to spread these defaming narratives, both in her online videos and in broader media outlets. This amplification sheds a broader light on judicial misconduct and the systemic targeting of innocent individuals—particularly those who did not align with the desired narrative. McKinney’s actions, alongside others in the media, have led to the intentional smearing of men who refused to conform to the narrative, including the release of their personal images without consent, causing irreparable harm.
These individuals, often wrongly associated with high-profile cases, have been unjustly vilified and treated as victims due to their refusal to participate in a falsified narrative. The malicious release of their images, and the subsequent defamatory content, reflects clear retaliation for their refusal to conform. We are confident that, had these individuals been women, their pictures would never have been leaked or shared in such a malicious manner. The psychological damage caused by these violations is profound, leading to emotional distress, public humiliation, and the permanent tarnishing of their reputations.
Furthermore, the violation of these individuals' civil rights is undeniable. McKinney’s actions, in collusion with media outlets, directly infringe upon their rights to privacy, to be free from defamation, and to be treated with dignity. The release of their personal photos, coupled with the unsubstantiated and harmful narratives, constitutes a severe violation of their civil rights under U.S. law, including the right to be free from harassment and the right to personal security and privacy. The act of releasing these images with malice, in an effort to ruin the lives and careers of these individuals, reflects a clear violation of both federal law and the protections afforded to individuals under civil rights statutes, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Privacy Act of 1974, and laws governing defamation and harassment. The consequences of these violations are far-reaching, and it is critical that those responsible be held accountable for their actions.
We call for an investigation into the malicious release of personal images, the psychological harm caused, and the broader civil rights violations resulting from these actions. Accountability must be enforced to ensure that these types of retaliatory, harmful behaviors are not allowed to continue unchecked, and that the law protects those who are subjected to such violations.*
False Claims and Impact on Innocent Individuals: Beyond high-profile cases like the Sean Combs trial, McKinney has defamed countless innocent Black men, branding them as violent, "dusty janitors," and criminal. This narrative extends to individuals who either did or did not support Combs, and she has used these stereotypes to attack the personal and professional lives of many Black men, further marginalizing them in public and legal spheres. These actions are particularly concerning because they have been weaponized not only through social media but also in judicial contexts, where McKinney’s content has been used to paint a broader, dangerous narrative.
Jury Tampering and Judicial Misconduct:
Jury Tampering Allegations: McKinney’s actions go beyond defamation. She has attempted to manipulate public opinion and sway jurors’ decisions, particularly in high-profile cases involving Black men. McKinney’s inflammatory language and racially charged content have been used to influence the integrity of the judicial process, with McKinney’s platform being exploited to challenge the fairness of the legal system.
Impact on Legal Proceedings: McKinney's deliberate manipulation of media narratives, including those surrounding publicized legal cases, has undermined the legal process. This misconduct threatens the core principles of justice, specifically the impartiality of juries and the right to a fair trial.
Violations of Social Media Platform Terms of Service (TOS):
Platform Liability: McKinney’s consistent violations of social media Terms of Service by spreading misinformation, inciting violence, and targeting individuals with defamatory content are well-documented. Despite these repeated violations, McKinney continues to profit from her content and maintain an influential platform.
Failure to Enforce Platform Guidelines: Social media companies like YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter have failed to adequately address McKinney’s breaches of their Terms of Service. These platforms have allowed harmful content to remain available, despite being alerted to the violations, which further perpetuates the damage caused to both individuals and the broader public.
Violation of Federal Laws:
Civil Rights Violations: The actions of Jacqueline McKinney (Tisa Tells) are not just a matter of personal misconduct—they have serious implications for civil rights. McKinney’s behavior aligns with previous federal cases involving racial bias, media manipulation, and defamation, and her actions represent a direct violation of the rights of individuals targeted by her content.
Supporting Evidence:
Video Documentation and Timestamp Analysis:
Numerous videos and livestreams by Tisa Tells, which contain defamatory language and false accusations, have been timestamped and cataloged. These recordings will be submitted as part of the full evidence package, clearly illustrating McKinney’s repeated violations of defamation laws.
Platform Violation Records:
Attached documentation includes records of flagged content and past violations across YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter. These records highlight the failure of these platforms to uphold their Terms of Service and protect users from malicious content.
Legal Precedents and Relevant Case Law:
Brandenburg v. Ohio, Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., and other key defamation and First Amendment cases will be referenced to demonstrate the legal consequences of McKinney’s actions. These cases show the clear risk that McKinney’s inflammatory, defamatory speech poses to the public’s safety and the integrity of legal proceedings.
Juror and Witness Impact:
Evidence detailing the potential interference in jury trials and the impact McKinney’s actions have had on the fairness of legal proceedings will be provided. This will include specific references to high-profile cases in which McKinney’s narrative has caused harm to the due process rights of those involved.
Request for Action:
In light of the severity and far-reaching impact of Jacqueline McKinney’s actions, we respectfully request the following actions be taken:
Investigation into Defamation: A full investigation into the defamation of Black men and other individuals by McKinney, with a focus on the reputational and emotional harm caused. It is important to emphasize that this defamation extends far beyond the Sean Combs case. McKinney’s content has harmed countless innocent Black men across the U.S. and around the world. McKinney’s platform has branded Black men, not just as violent criminals, but as “dusty janitors” who should be “checked” and as dangerous individuals who need to be “ruined.” Her content has painted us as violent and unworthy of respect, calling for the destruction of our lives, families, and the future of our children.
Investigation into Jury Tampering: A thorough investigation into McKinney’s actions in potentially influencing jury decisions and manipulating public opinion during legal proceedings. McKinney’s inflammatory content, which directly targets Black men, threatens the impartiality of the judicial system and undermines public trust in the fairness of trials.
Enforcement of Social Media Guidelines: Immediate enforcement of social media platform Terms of Service to address McKinney’s violations, including account suspension and other measures to ensure that harmful content is not monetized or allowed to spread.
Legal Accountability: Pursue legal action against Jacqueline McKinney (Tisa Tells) for violations of civil rights, defamation laws, and judicial misconduct. Her actions have caused harm to individuals, families, and communities and must be held accountable.
Conclusion:
Jacqueline McKinney, under her alias Tisa Tells, has caused irreparable damage to the reputation and emotional well-being of many innocent Black men. Her actions have systematically targeted individuals for defamation, attempted to undermine the fairness of legal proceedings, and violated both federal law and platform Terms of Service. Her platform, which continues to be monetized despite these violations, amplifies her harmful content to millions of viewers, further perpetuating the dangerous narrative she has created.
It is imperative that the Department of Justice intervenes swiftly to investigate these violations and hold McKinney accountable. Her actions are not merely a personal failure—they represent a broader, systemic issue that demands immediate attention.
We remain hopeful that the DOJ will take prompt action in this matter and that a transparent investigation will lead to the legal accountability McKinney and her affiliates have long avoided. All necessary documentation and evidence are attached and available for review, and we stand ready to assist in any way necessary to ensure justice is served.
We look forward to your prompt response and the opportunity to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
Black Men United
InnocentBlackMenUnited@gmail.com
#JusticeForAll #CivilRights #MensAdvocacy #ReformNow #InnocenceProject #DepartmentOfJustice #DOJ #WhiteHouse #MensAdvocacyGroups #CivilRightsGroups #AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion #ACLU #NAACP #HumanRightsCampaign #NationalOrganizationForWomen #NOW #NationalCivilRightsAssociation #EqualJusticeInitiative #EJI #SouthernPovertyLawCenter #SPLC #CampaignForPrisonReform #TheInnocenceNetwork #FreeMindsBookClub #WritingWorkshop #JusticePolicyInstitute #NationalActionNetwork #NAN #ACLUofMensRights #MensRightsMovement #MRM #FamiliesAgainstMandatoryMinimums #FAMM #JusticeForAllCoalition #AmericanBarAssociation #ABA
0
The Issue
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Office of Public Integrity
Washington, D.C. 20530
Date:
July 13, 2025
From:
Black Men United
InnocentBlackMenUnited@gmail.com
Subject: Urgent Request for Investigation into Defamation, Jury Tampering, and Violations of Federal Law by Jacquelin McKinney (Tisa Tells)
Introduction:
This formal complaint addresses the grave and continuing misconduct of Jacquelin McKinney, known publicly by her online alias, Tisa Tells. McKinney has systematically engaged in defamation, jury tampering, and the violation of social media platform Terms of Service, causing irreparable harm to individuals, families, communities, and the judicial system. McKinney's actions have reached far beyond simple defamation and have escalated into a coordinated attempt to undermine the integrity of legal proceedings and public perception of Black men in the United States and around the world.
We urge the U.S. Department of Justice to take immediate and decisive action to investigate these serious allegations, as they involve significant breaches of civil rights, defamation laws, and judicial misconduct.
Summary of Allegations:
Defamation and Media Manipulation:
Defamation of Black Men: Jacquelin McKinney, under the alias Tisa Tells, has propagated false and defamatory statements about Black men, systematically damaging their reputations and causing widespread emotional and societal harm. These defamatory remarks are not isolated but are part of a broader pattern of false accusations and racial stereotypes. McKinney's content has fueled harmful, racially motivated narratives, painting innocent Black men as inherently violent and dangerous.
Involvement in Media Manipulation:
McKinney’s content has been amplified through media channels and her substantial social media following. With her platform, McKinney has used a mixture of misinformation and inflammatory content to spread these defaming narratives, both in her online videos and in broader media outlets. This amplification sheds a broader light on judicial misconduct and the systemic targeting of innocent individuals—particularly those who did not align with the desired narrative. McKinney’s actions, alongside others in the media, have led to the intentional smearing of men who refused to conform to the narrative, including the release of their personal images without consent, causing irreparable harm.
These individuals, often wrongly associated with high-profile cases, have been unjustly vilified and treated as victims due to their refusal to participate in a falsified narrative. The malicious release of their images, and the subsequent defamatory content, reflects clear retaliation for their refusal to conform. We are confident that, had these individuals been women, their pictures would never have been leaked or shared in such a malicious manner. The psychological damage caused by these violations is profound, leading to emotional distress, public humiliation, and the permanent tarnishing of their reputations.
Furthermore, the violation of these individuals' civil rights is undeniable. McKinney’s actions, in collusion with media outlets, directly infringe upon their rights to privacy, to be free from defamation, and to be treated with dignity. The release of their personal photos, coupled with the unsubstantiated and harmful narratives, constitutes a severe violation of their civil rights under U.S. law, including the right to be free from harassment and the right to personal security and privacy. The act of releasing these images with malice, in an effort to ruin the lives and careers of these individuals, reflects a clear violation of both federal law and the protections afforded to individuals under civil rights statutes, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Privacy Act of 1974, and laws governing defamation and harassment. The consequences of these violations are far-reaching, and it is critical that those responsible be held accountable for their actions.
We call for an investigation into the malicious release of personal images, the psychological harm caused, and the broader civil rights violations resulting from these actions. Accountability must be enforced to ensure that these types of retaliatory, harmful behaviors are not allowed to continue unchecked, and that the law protects those who are subjected to such violations.*
False Claims and Impact on Innocent Individuals: Beyond high-profile cases like the Sean Combs trial, McKinney has defamed countless innocent Black men, branding them as violent, "dusty janitors," and criminal. This narrative extends to individuals who either did or did not support Combs, and she has used these stereotypes to attack the personal and professional lives of many Black men, further marginalizing them in public and legal spheres. These actions are particularly concerning because they have been weaponized not only through social media but also in judicial contexts, where McKinney’s content has been used to paint a broader, dangerous narrative.
Jury Tampering and Judicial Misconduct:
Jury Tampering Allegations: McKinney’s actions go beyond defamation. She has attempted to manipulate public opinion and sway jurors’ decisions, particularly in high-profile cases involving Black men. McKinney’s inflammatory language and racially charged content have been used to influence the integrity of the judicial process, with McKinney’s platform being exploited to challenge the fairness of the legal system.
Impact on Legal Proceedings: McKinney's deliberate manipulation of media narratives, including those surrounding publicized legal cases, has undermined the legal process. This misconduct threatens the core principles of justice, specifically the impartiality of juries and the right to a fair trial.
Violations of Social Media Platform Terms of Service (TOS):
Platform Liability: McKinney’s consistent violations of social media Terms of Service by spreading misinformation, inciting violence, and targeting individuals with defamatory content are well-documented. Despite these repeated violations, McKinney continues to profit from her content and maintain an influential platform.
Failure to Enforce Platform Guidelines: Social media companies like YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter have failed to adequately address McKinney’s breaches of their Terms of Service. These platforms have allowed harmful content to remain available, despite being alerted to the violations, which further perpetuates the damage caused to both individuals and the broader public.
Violation of Federal Laws:
Civil Rights Violations: The actions of Jacqueline McKinney (Tisa Tells) are not just a matter of personal misconduct—they have serious implications for civil rights. McKinney’s behavior aligns with previous federal cases involving racial bias, media manipulation, and defamation, and her actions represent a direct violation of the rights of individuals targeted by her content.
Supporting Evidence:
Video Documentation and Timestamp Analysis:
Numerous videos and livestreams by Tisa Tells, which contain defamatory language and false accusations, have been timestamped and cataloged. These recordings will be submitted as part of the full evidence package, clearly illustrating McKinney’s repeated violations of defamation laws.
Platform Violation Records:
Attached documentation includes records of flagged content and past violations across YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter. These records highlight the failure of these platforms to uphold their Terms of Service and protect users from malicious content.
Legal Precedents and Relevant Case Law:
Brandenburg v. Ohio, Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., and other key defamation and First Amendment cases will be referenced to demonstrate the legal consequences of McKinney’s actions. These cases show the clear risk that McKinney’s inflammatory, defamatory speech poses to the public’s safety and the integrity of legal proceedings.
Juror and Witness Impact:
Evidence detailing the potential interference in jury trials and the impact McKinney’s actions have had on the fairness of legal proceedings will be provided. This will include specific references to high-profile cases in which McKinney’s narrative has caused harm to the due process rights of those involved.
Request for Action:
In light of the severity and far-reaching impact of Jacqueline McKinney’s actions, we respectfully request the following actions be taken:
Investigation into Defamation: A full investigation into the defamation of Black men and other individuals by McKinney, with a focus on the reputational and emotional harm caused. It is important to emphasize that this defamation extends far beyond the Sean Combs case. McKinney’s content has harmed countless innocent Black men across the U.S. and around the world. McKinney’s platform has branded Black men, not just as violent criminals, but as “dusty janitors” who should be “checked” and as dangerous individuals who need to be “ruined.” Her content has painted us as violent and unworthy of respect, calling for the destruction of our lives, families, and the future of our children.
Investigation into Jury Tampering: A thorough investigation into McKinney’s actions in potentially influencing jury decisions and manipulating public opinion during legal proceedings. McKinney’s inflammatory content, which directly targets Black men, threatens the impartiality of the judicial system and undermines public trust in the fairness of trials.
Enforcement of Social Media Guidelines: Immediate enforcement of social media platform Terms of Service to address McKinney’s violations, including account suspension and other measures to ensure that harmful content is not monetized or allowed to spread.
Legal Accountability: Pursue legal action against Jacqueline McKinney (Tisa Tells) for violations of civil rights, defamation laws, and judicial misconduct. Her actions have caused harm to individuals, families, and communities and must be held accountable.
Conclusion:
Jacqueline McKinney, under her alias Tisa Tells, has caused irreparable damage to the reputation and emotional well-being of many innocent Black men. Her actions have systematically targeted individuals for defamation, attempted to undermine the fairness of legal proceedings, and violated both federal law and platform Terms of Service. Her platform, which continues to be monetized despite these violations, amplifies her harmful content to millions of viewers, further perpetuating the dangerous narrative she has created.
It is imperative that the Department of Justice intervenes swiftly to investigate these violations and hold McKinney accountable. Her actions are not merely a personal failure—they represent a broader, systemic issue that demands immediate attention.
We remain hopeful that the DOJ will take prompt action in this matter and that a transparent investigation will lead to the legal accountability McKinney and her affiliates have long avoided. All necessary documentation and evidence are attached and available for review, and we stand ready to assist in any way necessary to ensure justice is served.
We look forward to your prompt response and the opportunity to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
Black Men United
InnocentBlackMenUnited@gmail.com
#JusticeForAll #CivilRights #MensAdvocacy #ReformNow #InnocenceProject #DepartmentOfJustice #DOJ #WhiteHouse #MensAdvocacyGroups #CivilRightsGroups #AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion #ACLU #NAACP #HumanRightsCampaign #NationalOrganizationForWomen #NOW #NationalCivilRightsAssociation #EqualJusticeInitiative #EJI #SouthernPovertyLawCenter #SPLC #CampaignForPrisonReform #TheInnocenceNetwork #FreeMindsBookClub #WritingWorkshop #JusticePolicyInstitute #NationalActionNetwork #NAN #ACLUofMensRights #MensRightsMovement #MRM #FamiliesAgainstMandatoryMinimums #FAMM #JusticeForAllCoalition #AmericanBarAssociation #ABA
0
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on July 20, 2025