A$AP Rocky (Roc Nation artist) was on camera with a gun in his hands and his only defence was that the gun on video was FAKE and he was found NOT GUILTY in the state of California...

But Tory Lanez was found GUILTY of all charges despite no forensic evidence like DNA or witness testimony to prove he had the gun in his hands. Reasonable doubt loomed over a 10 day trial as the prosecution was unable to show us that there were not alternative explanations of the events. A circus of speculation, insufficient evidence, inconsistencies, and drunken memories left us without much moral certainty of any truth. We literally witnessed every other testimony filled with inconsistenties and contradictions. Including a plausible suspect request full immunity and plead the fifth to not incriminate herself. Kelsey also committed perjury. Many said she was paid off; how is this reasonable if she said things  damaging to Tory Lanez case? The lead investigator did a shotty job of fully interviewing the one neutral witness, and ignored evidence that it could have been another person.They didn't even test the other potential suspect's for DNA on the gun. Tory's DNA was not found on the gun; a female's was. Meg and Kelsey lied about violently fighting that night. Meg lied about being intimate, arguing in the car, being extremely drunk and about why she was asked to leave the party. There is a witness that says, "THE GIRL shot first" and he was asked repeatedly in different ways and maintained the same answer. Plus Megan, the victim, lied on Gayle King, on her IG lives and in interviews. She also went from stating, she didn't know who did it and that her back was turned, to "You shot me". Her story then progressed to that she saw him do it when she turned around. Later, that she turned her neck, seeing it from the side. Next, Kelsey admitted that her September, 2022 testimony was fabricated and that her text message was sent out of panic. Panic of what? What did she do? What is she asking immunity for, or from? Why did she lie and say "Meg and I might have just bumped each other that night?" Sadly, the judge allowed a lot of leniency towards the prosecution. For instance, playing Kelsey's  audio even though she said she was lying at the time due to pressure from the state. The judge also stopped the Defense from questioning the detective about his DV past, stating it isn't relevant. Yet, would let the state question Tory's entire background outside of the case, to paint a 'scary black man' image if he got on stand. Megan Pete has been allowed from day 1 to promote a narrative without Tory able to speak once. She campaigned, building a career gaining soldiers including celebrity and political supporters. She made millions and became Hip-Hop's "it girl." The jury was not able to even hear from the driver who was a witness for Tory Lanez. Why? The unprepared prosecution said they needed a week, knowing that request would prevent another witness from telling a different side from Meg. Not to mention, two jurors got replaced mid-way. After 8 days, most of us thought this would end in a mistrial at the most. What is interesting is that: as of yet, no charges are being brought against Meg and Kelsey for committing perjury on the stand. The state got handed a case filled with holes and won because of an irresponsible jury, which voted to send a man away. The law says if there is any resonable doubt, then it is the jury's job to declare one innocent, yet that's not what happened. The justice system failed him!

Demand Rob Bonta and Governor Newsom release Tory Lanez from prison by calling (916) 445-9555 or emailing the California Attorney General's office at askconsumers@doj.ca.gov

You can use this script email when writing to them

Subject: Request for Review of Case - People v. Daystar Peterson (Tory Lanez) - Case No. BA490599

Dear Attorney General Rob Bonta,

I urge your office to review the conviction of Tory Lanez in People v. Daystar Peterson (Case No. BA490599), as the case lacked forensic evidence, had inconsistent witness testimonies, and ignored potential alternative explanations, raising serious concerns about the fairness of the trial.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
[Your Contact Information])