A few months ago the AdobeStock agency decided to accept content generated with artificial intelligence. Without going into the merits of whether it is right or wrong, we just want to stop the unstoppable phenomenon of massive uploads by new authors who have only now become collaborators, only now that it is possible to be called artists without knowing how to photograph, draw or record footage .
We don't want to judge but we want to protect all the work that we faithful contributors have done over all these years, we want at least a limitation on the loading of this content that is suffocating the database and making our new content invisible. Our contents are the result of work, commitment, professionalism, skills and it is not right to be eclipsed by this content created with so little effort and without authorship and therefore without copyright.

We ask Adobestock to impose a restrictive limit on the submission of AI-generated content, so as to also offer real content fairly and to encourage new AI artists to send only a few images with greater attention to quality.

If it is really not possible to add a daily/weekly or monthly upload limit, we ask Adobestock to be more strict in approving content, which often presents important artifacts or inconsistencies compared to reality.

We are not against users who generate AI images, but given the ease and speed of production we think it is right to offer AI content responsibly and with common sense, reminding all "AI artists" that their images are generated thanks to our photographs, our illustrations and our footage.