Ban ALL UK 5G Infrastructure and Ban WIFI located inside ALL UK schools and nurseries
Ban ALL UK 5G Infrastructure and Ban WIFI located inside ALL UK schools and nurseries
The Issue
We the undersigned demand that the U.K. government follow the people first attitude of Switzerland and Ban 5G due to the litany of health concerns attached to Electric and Magnetic field radiation (EMF) and radio frequencies. It seems insidious that much of the infrastructure is being sited near to schools. We demand that the government stop installation of ALL 5G infrastructure and switch off any operational 5G.
The debate surrounding the safety of 5G, with respect to its impact on wildlife, specifically pollinators and birds, human health and the environment, is far from over. We do not have impact safety studies. Many scientists have written to the powers that be asking them to reconsider, these requests are being ignored by UK government. Switzerland have put an indefinite moratorium on the 5G roll out. They have listened to the people’s concerns. As detailed below the EU have left it to member states to decide on their own approach to the implementation of new 5G network infrastructure.
“Conclusion
The problem of health effects of RF EMF has not been definitively resolved, but due to the results of previous research on possible health effect of RF EMF, it seems necessary to use precautionary principles and ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) principles, when the new sources of electromagnetic emissions will be planned and installed.”
SOURCE https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685799
https://radiopaedia.org/articles/radiation-pneumonitis?lang=gb
The conversion of street lights has been the subject of a court case in Gateshead. The judge was clear in his judgement, the local council are not qualified enough to understand the impact of 5G on their constituents. The claim of the expert in EMF and RF, who protests against 5G, is that the infrastructure cannot be insured because it is illegal.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/mark-steele-5g-gateshead-council-15269240
The protestor concerned Mark Steele has been censored on social media, videos removed, his website is linked below
https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/category/5g-rollout/
We are electrical beings and the current guidelines need a complete overhaul. WIFI is always on. The effects of non ionising radiation being, emitted 24/7, have not been taken into account, they have not been researched properly. 5G has not been approached with enough caution. The SMART devices, which we carry in our pockets, also need to be properly researched with respect to the always on issue.
https://brainworksneurotherapy.com/what-are-brainwaves
Councils are not qualified to understand the impact of their decisions. They are lying to constituents
Councils are cutting down trees in contravention of the climate emergency law adopted by government. We can’t have it both ways. Sheffield Council guilty of vandalism.
https://www.vigiliae.org/further-proof-that-trees-are-being-chopped-down-for-5g/
5G generates radio frequency radiation which can damage DNA and lead to cancer, will cause oxidative damage, which causes premature ageing, disrupting cell metabolism and potentially lead to other diseases through the generation of stress proteins. Ultimately 5G damages the bodies ability to fight infection because it damages the immune system.
5G Network
The expansion of the 5G network, intended to enable faster wireless transmission of larger amounts of data, requires the installation of many more antennas in urban areas. In this way, the scientists argue, there is no longer anyone escaping the potentially harmful effects of radiation. After all, we are already exposed to 2G, 3G, 4G and Wi-Fi radiation.
Industry’s influence on studies and safety limits
It has been shown that studies on the health impact of electromagnetic radiation in the past have often been influenced by industry. The scientists insist that independent studies on the effects of 5G radiation “to ensure the safety of the population” should now be carried out. They therefore ask the European Commission to postpone the expansion of the 5G network “until the potential risks to human health and the environment have been thoroughly investigated by scientists independent of industry”.
Problems with official ICNIRP exposure limits for electromagnetic radiation
“In conclusion, this article demonstrates that the EU has given mandate to a 13‑member, non‑governmental private group, the ICNIRP, to decide upon the RF radiation guidelines. The ICNIRP, as well as SCENIHR, are well shown not to use the sound evaluation of science on the detrimental effects of RF radiation, which is documented in the research … These two small organizations are producing reports which seem to deny the existence of scientific published reports on the related risks.” – Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation, L. Hardell & R. Nyberg, MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 3 Jan 2020.
How much is safe? Radiation authorities rely on controversial group for safety advice – Investigate Europe
FCC: Captured Agency
Response of the European Commission
In question E-003975/2018, Nicola Caputo (S&D) asked the European Commission whether it intends to set up a European task force of independent and impartial scientists on electromagnetic fields to examine the health risks. In her reply the European Commission states that ‘under Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the primary responsibility for protecting the public from potential harmful effects of electromagnetic fields remains with the Member States, including the choice of measures to be adopted based on age and health status.’
In question P-001526-19 Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE) asked for an assessment of biological and health impact of 5G: “The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership project (5G PPP) is the world’s largest project of its kind, with EUR 700 million in EU funding. The rollout of 5G will expose people to increased microwave and radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Will the 5G PPP fund any study on the biological impact of 5G radiation? Will the Commission conduct any prior impact assessment on the launching of 5G in the EU, in particular as regards human health? Could it explain how an impact assessment would be conducted, or if one has already taken place, could it provide details on how it was done?”
971
The Issue
We the undersigned demand that the U.K. government follow the people first attitude of Switzerland and Ban 5G due to the litany of health concerns attached to Electric and Magnetic field radiation (EMF) and radio frequencies. It seems insidious that much of the infrastructure is being sited near to schools. We demand that the government stop installation of ALL 5G infrastructure and switch off any operational 5G.
The debate surrounding the safety of 5G, with respect to its impact on wildlife, specifically pollinators and birds, human health and the environment, is far from over. We do not have impact safety studies. Many scientists have written to the powers that be asking them to reconsider, these requests are being ignored by UK government. Switzerland have put an indefinite moratorium on the 5G roll out. They have listened to the people’s concerns. As detailed below the EU have left it to member states to decide on their own approach to the implementation of new 5G network infrastructure.
“Conclusion
The problem of health effects of RF EMF has not been definitively resolved, but due to the results of previous research on possible health effect of RF EMF, it seems necessary to use precautionary principles and ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) principles, when the new sources of electromagnetic emissions will be planned and installed.”
SOURCE https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685799
https://radiopaedia.org/articles/radiation-pneumonitis?lang=gb
The conversion of street lights has been the subject of a court case in Gateshead. The judge was clear in his judgement, the local council are not qualified enough to understand the impact of 5G on their constituents. The claim of the expert in EMF and RF, who protests against 5G, is that the infrastructure cannot be insured because it is illegal.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/mark-steele-5g-gateshead-council-15269240
The protestor concerned Mark Steele has been censored on social media, videos removed, his website is linked below
https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/category/5g-rollout/
We are electrical beings and the current guidelines need a complete overhaul. WIFI is always on. The effects of non ionising radiation being, emitted 24/7, have not been taken into account, they have not been researched properly. 5G has not been approached with enough caution. The SMART devices, which we carry in our pockets, also need to be properly researched with respect to the always on issue.
https://brainworksneurotherapy.com/what-are-brainwaves
Councils are not qualified to understand the impact of their decisions. They are lying to constituents
Councils are cutting down trees in contravention of the climate emergency law adopted by government. We can’t have it both ways. Sheffield Council guilty of vandalism.
https://www.vigiliae.org/further-proof-that-trees-are-being-chopped-down-for-5g/
5G generates radio frequency radiation which can damage DNA and lead to cancer, will cause oxidative damage, which causes premature ageing, disrupting cell metabolism and potentially lead to other diseases through the generation of stress proteins. Ultimately 5G damages the bodies ability to fight infection because it damages the immune system.
5G Network
The expansion of the 5G network, intended to enable faster wireless transmission of larger amounts of data, requires the installation of many more antennas in urban areas. In this way, the scientists argue, there is no longer anyone escaping the potentially harmful effects of radiation. After all, we are already exposed to 2G, 3G, 4G and Wi-Fi radiation.
Industry’s influence on studies and safety limits
It has been shown that studies on the health impact of electromagnetic radiation in the past have often been influenced by industry. The scientists insist that independent studies on the effects of 5G radiation “to ensure the safety of the population” should now be carried out. They therefore ask the European Commission to postpone the expansion of the 5G network “until the potential risks to human health and the environment have been thoroughly investigated by scientists independent of industry”.
Problems with official ICNIRP exposure limits for electromagnetic radiation
“In conclusion, this article demonstrates that the EU has given mandate to a 13‑member, non‑governmental private group, the ICNIRP, to decide upon the RF radiation guidelines. The ICNIRP, as well as SCENIHR, are well shown not to use the sound evaluation of science on the detrimental effects of RF radiation, which is documented in the research … These two small organizations are producing reports which seem to deny the existence of scientific published reports on the related risks.” – Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation, L. Hardell & R. Nyberg, MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 3 Jan 2020.
How much is safe? Radiation authorities rely on controversial group for safety advice – Investigate Europe
FCC: Captured Agency
Response of the European Commission
In question E-003975/2018, Nicola Caputo (S&D) asked the European Commission whether it intends to set up a European task force of independent and impartial scientists on electromagnetic fields to examine the health risks. In her reply the European Commission states that ‘under Article 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the primary responsibility for protecting the public from potential harmful effects of electromagnetic fields remains with the Member States, including the choice of measures to be adopted based on age and health status.’
In question P-001526-19 Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE) asked for an assessment of biological and health impact of 5G: “The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership project (5G PPP) is the world’s largest project of its kind, with EUR 700 million in EU funding. The rollout of 5G will expose people to increased microwave and radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Will the 5G PPP fund any study on the biological impact of 5G radiation? Will the Commission conduct any prior impact assessment on the launching of 5G in the EU, in particular as regards human health? Could it explain how an impact assessment would be conducted, or if one has already taken place, could it provide details on how it was done?”
971
The Decision Makers
Share this petition
Petition created on 29 March 2020