

The Save Junior Act
The Issue
There are widely shared situations Online and in social media where a young child shows clear signs of developmental delay, yet no consistent system steps in to ensure evaluation or support. In some cases, concerns are raised about a parent’s actions during pregnancy, including possible substance exposure, or a lack of follow-up care after birth, while the child continues to go without proper assessment or intervention.
When a child cannot speak, walk, or meet basic developmental milestones, and there is no verified medical or developmental care, that child is at risk of being left behind permanently. Early signs such as lack of movement, poor responsiveness, delayed motor skills, or inability to communicate are critical warning signals that require immediate attention.
Infants and disabled children cannot advocate for themselves. They rely entirely on caregivers and public systems to recognize these warning signs and act early. However, the current system is inconsistent and often reactive, meaning action may not be taken until delays become severe or irreversible.
Early childhood is the most critical stage of brain development. Missing this window can lead to long-term or permanent limitations that could have been reduced or prevented with early intervention, therapy, and proper care.
This is not about one specific person, but it reflects a visible and ongoing gap in the system. When clear signs are present and no structured response is required, vulnerable children can be overlooked, ignored, or left without help during the most important stage of their development.
Proposed Solution: The Save Junior Act
We call on the California State Legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom to introduce and pass The Save Junior Act.
This law would require:
A high-priority response for infants, toddlers, and nonverbal or disabled children reported at risk.
In-person welfare checks within required child-welfare timelines, with urgent cases prioritized for immediate or 24-hour response.
Developmental screening based on accepted pediatric standards, including general screening at 9, 18, and 30 months, and autism screening at 18 and 24 months.
Referral to California Early Start/IDEA Part C services for children birth to 36 months who show developmental delay or are at risk.
Follow-up care, family support, transportation help, and in-home services before punishment, unless the child is in immediate danger.
Escalation only when the child remains at risk and the caregiver refuses or repeatedly fails to participate.
Public reporting of anonymized response times, screenings, referrals, and outcomes.

1
The Issue
There are widely shared situations Online and in social media where a young child shows clear signs of developmental delay, yet no consistent system steps in to ensure evaluation or support. In some cases, concerns are raised about a parent’s actions during pregnancy, including possible substance exposure, or a lack of follow-up care after birth, while the child continues to go without proper assessment or intervention.
When a child cannot speak, walk, or meet basic developmental milestones, and there is no verified medical or developmental care, that child is at risk of being left behind permanently. Early signs such as lack of movement, poor responsiveness, delayed motor skills, or inability to communicate are critical warning signals that require immediate attention.
Infants and disabled children cannot advocate for themselves. They rely entirely on caregivers and public systems to recognize these warning signs and act early. However, the current system is inconsistent and often reactive, meaning action may not be taken until delays become severe or irreversible.
Early childhood is the most critical stage of brain development. Missing this window can lead to long-term or permanent limitations that could have been reduced or prevented with early intervention, therapy, and proper care.
This is not about one specific person, but it reflects a visible and ongoing gap in the system. When clear signs are present and no structured response is required, vulnerable children can be overlooked, ignored, or left without help during the most important stage of their development.
Proposed Solution: The Save Junior Act
We call on the California State Legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom to introduce and pass The Save Junior Act.
This law would require:
A high-priority response for infants, toddlers, and nonverbal or disabled children reported at risk.
In-person welfare checks within required child-welfare timelines, with urgent cases prioritized for immediate or 24-hour response.
Developmental screening based on accepted pediatric standards, including general screening at 9, 18, and 30 months, and autism screening at 18 and 24 months.
Referral to California Early Start/IDEA Part C services for children birth to 36 months who show developmental delay or are at risk.
Follow-up care, family support, transportation help, and in-home services before punishment, unless the child is in immediate danger.
Escalation only when the child remains at risk and the caregiver refuses or repeatedly fails to participate.
Public reporting of anonymized response times, screenings, referrals, and outcomes.

The Decision Makers

Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on April 29, 2026