Petition updateMARTIN BRYANT DESERVES A
CORONIAL
INQUEST AND FOR
ALL OUR SAKES!!!KANGAROO COURTS IN AUSTRALIA!. FINDING FALCONIO!! BELL'S RING WITH MARTIN BRYANTS CASE!!

N AWestern Australia, Australia
Nov 18, 2015
17 NOV 2015
UPDATE FOR ALL LISTEES
NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL EMAIL LISTS
FINDING FALCONIO
no copyright forward as you please
Dear READER,
As some of you know, my attention has been on the Port Arthur incident. Facts suggest innocent Martin Bryant has been set up to be killed inside Risdon Prison in Tasmania, Australia. (more below)
Thanks to all those who sent me copies of recent Falconio-related articles (October 2015) published by News Corp Australia - Australia's premier purveyor of public poison. What do these articles tell the public?
Absolutely nothing of substance. NOTHING! But that is not their purpose. They were published to keep the official narrative alive - the monster Bradley Murdoch killed Peter Falconio and Murdoch's behaviour in prison proves he is bad.
Now the question we have to ask is this: Why is it so important for the public to be told this more than 14 years after the Barrow Creek incident? If Bradley had killed Peter Falconio, and this was proved with hard evidence during a sound (not corrupt) trial, there is no need to keep telling the public that Bradley Murdoch is guilty. Everyone would believe it.
But they do NOT believe it. Because Bradley Murdoch is NOT guilty of killing Peter Falconio.
Bradley was never proved guilty in a sound court. The whole process he was put through was a show-trial set up by a KANGAROO COURT. The evidence was manipulated, lies were presented and accepted as credible proof, exculpatory evidence was ignored, integrity was sold out by the lawyers and the judge (Brian Martin). And as for our Joanne Rachel Lees - the poor victim, the victim, the victim - with her "black glossy hair," and her "flawless complexion," and her "baby blue eyes," and her "rosebud lips," and her "dazzling white smile" - she was and remains a LIAR, one of the people implicated in the wrongful imprisonment of Bradley Murdoch.
Yesterday, more nonsense came to me. Thanks again to all those who sent me copies of, yes that's right, more bullshit articles from News Corp Australia. Another Falconio-related story about yet another grave. A grave story indeed. How many grave stories will News Corp Australia publish? Recall a while back we had one numbskull telling the world that Falconio's body had been concealed in a well - could have been hidden in that well - could have been - might have been. Well well. Guess what. There wasn't any body down that well but maybe it did make the papers sell. How did Australia end up with such idiots reporting rubbish as if it was the second coming? - might have been - could have been. Forgive them Jesus, I can't. And the public is expected to believe it. Yes, a body can be hidden in a shallow grave, or down an old well. But find that body first. Don't blurt out a possibility as if it is a certainty - we just couldn't find it, but we know it's there somewhere........
On page 326 of FIND! FALCONIO Dead or Alive it states this:
"What transpired during and after the trial of Murdoch is the fact that when some presumption could not be disproved, that presumption was officially accepted as the truth. It had to be to bring about the conviction of Murdoch which is what Northern Territory officials had to have after the Chamberlain-case fiasco. And once a presumption is accepted by a kangaroo court and written into the court record, it becomes an official truth and it is disseminated shamelessly.
"The whole matter of the grave that was never found is yet another part of the Falconio case that defies credible exposition. There is talk of a vehicle, but no such vehicle was ever found. There is talk about a medium-size male with long shoulder-length hair, but he was not positively identified. There is talk of a killing on the highway, but the evidence there contained animal blood and Lees who says she was there never saw a body. There is talk of a big engraved six-shooter, but no such weapon was ever found. There is talk of Lees slipping out the back of the killer’s vehicle, but there was no opening at the back of Murdoch’s Toyota. There is talk of Lees running in the darkness from the killer with his heeler dog, but no prints of him or the dog were ever detected. Etc.
"To say it is disturbing is an understatement. Because explanations were desperately needed, they were created by officials. Falconio was missing and there was some blood (included animal blood) on the highway – so Falconio had to have died by foul play. The body was not there – so it must have been taken away. The body has not been found – so it had to have been buried. The grave has not been found – so the killer must have been cunning. Murdoch was a drug runner who had been charged with rape in South Australia – forget those concocted charges were dismissed in a court – so he must have done it. Etc."
This never-ending demonisation of innocent Bradley Murdoch tells us that those who are, in some way, connected with the disappearance of Peter Marco Falconio are not feeling confident at all. They are not comfortable because more and more people have come to realize that the narrative officially associated with the Falconio case is corrupt. It is a lie. A BIG LIE. Hard evidence proves this and trumps all the circumstantial so-called evidence used to convict innocent Bradley Murdoch in that show-trial.
It is highly suggestive that publications of News Corp Australia keep broadcasting rubbish stories - it is not journalism - about innocent Bradley Murdoch. Instead of videoing an interview with the Falconio family in West Yorkshire and asking the members have they had any contact, either direct or indirect, with their son and brother Peter Marco Falconio since he disappeared in Australia in 2001, they publish rubbish. And as for that come-back that the Falconio family is grieving - the poor puppies - all the evidence I have seen, much of it supplied by investigators receiving this email, strongly suggests Falconio family members are up to their Yorkshire ying-yangs in a cover-up. (see 2-page summary in THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE)
Next week, an international Reward (A$20,000) will be announced related to the Port Arthur incident. This case has similarities to the Barrow Creek incident. And what is very similar is the way the two set-up patsies are demonized and trashed in MSM media with its never-ending articles declaring ad nauseam that they are guilty. But they are not - and hard evidence confirms their innocence. It is this hard evidence that frightens and drives officials to keep trying to push their official narrative. But their narratives are coming apart at the seams.
Yesterday, an email was directed to David Weisbrot - copies also went to his high-powered judicial and legal mates. (Will copy them in on this email too. see below) He is chairman of the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL which is the council that should rein in News Corp Australia and its rubbish. But News Corp Australia has Weisbrot by the gonads so he is helpless. Australians will continue to be subjected to rubbish reports, again let's not call it journalism, about innocent Bradley Murdoch and innocent Martin Bryant. If you would like a copy of my email to Weisbrot and Co. email murder.research@gmail.com - read about Gary Ramage the photojournalist who is selling - yes selling - cruel images of the mentally-handicapped Martin Bryant. Ramage calls Martin his "caged circus animal." This is going on in Australia right now, today.
Finally, here is something uplifting. Lawyers are now writing about the two corrupt cases mentioned above. The STENCH is finally forcing them to speak out. Here are some words received this morning from one barrister.
"The guys in the film have been there and done that, unlike the slime that put them away, the guys have a strong interest in justice. I can't count the number of cases I've done where the evidence has been strapped up to some extent, it seems to be part of the police culture. There is also the cases where there is total fabrication of evidence where the Police have a motive to convict someone, perhaps to cover up a screw-up on their part, or protect someone 'important'."
"Total fabrication of evidence where the Police have a motive to convict someone" - am sure that sounds familiar to you. But it's not just corrupt cops who are in on it. The fabricating of evidence and the lying and the unethical acts reach all the way up to corrupt judges at the top and of course to corrupt politicians. When was the last time you read about a cop, or a lawyer, or a judge, or any politician actually doing something about "unsafe" convictions and wrongful imprisonment? None of them give a damn about Bradley Murdoch, or Martin Bryant, or about all the other innocent people (women as well as men) wrongly imprisoned around Australia. The film the barrister refers to is this:
http://www.trueconvictionfilm.com/
As soon as things settle down with the Port Arthur incident, will get back to work for Bradley. Am planning a big distribution (airmail) in the UK.
Please keep in touch.
Sincerely,
KEITH
-------
Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7
1030 Vienna, Austria
43-1-9712401
related writings:
LEAKED DOCUMENTS:
Statements of Port Arthur Massacre Witnesses
(leaked from DPP Office, Hobart, Tasmania)
2015; 122 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL:
News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing
27 SEP 2015; 21 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE:
Readings Related to Injustice in Australia
(66 Readings; 80 Inserts; 100 authors)
2015; 2nd edition; 796 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
MASS MURDER:
Official Killing in Tasmania, Australia
2014; 2nd edition; 696 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
FIND! FALCONIO - Dead or Alive:
Concealing Crimes in Northern Territory, Australia
2012; 2nd edition: 500 pp
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
-------
copies:
David WEISBROT AM (david.weisbrot@gmail.com)
Chairman, AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL (info@presscouncil.org.au)
Prof Emeritus, Law School, The University of Sydney (law.info@sydney.edu.au)
Warwick ANDERSON AM (info@hfsp.org)
Secretary-General, International Human Frontier Science Program Organisation
Robert Shelton FRENCH (frenchcj@hcourt.gov.au)
Chief Judge, High Court of Australia
Richard GILBERT (RichardG@slaw.com.au)
CEO, Rule of Law Institute, Australia
Michael KIRBY AC (mail@michaelkirby.com.au)
Judge (ret), High Court of Australia
John McCARTHY QC (john.mccarthy@5wentworth.com.au)
Barrister, Wentworth Chambers, Sydney
Jacqui PARK (jpark@alliance.org.au)
CEO, Walkley Foundation for Journalism
Ronald TRENT (ronald.trent@sydney.edu.au)
Prof & Chair, Human Genetics Advisory Committee of the NHMRC
Prof, Molecular Genetics, The University of Sydney
Laurie WILSON (npc@npc.org.au)
President, National Press Club
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=EAC50CCE4F2F07A!2278&authkey=!AE5PXCs978XnlKQ&v=3&ithint=photo%2cjpg
Copy link
WhatsApp
Facebook
Nextdoor
Email
X