Petition updateMARTIN BRYANT DESERVES A
CORONIAL
INQUEST AND FOR
ALL OUR SAKES!!!KILLING MARTIN BRYANT. ALL LISTEES ON MARTIN BRYANT national & international email lists

N AWestern Australia, Australia
16 nov. 2015
KILLING MARTIN BRYANT
ALL LISTEES ON MARTIN BRYANT
national & international email lists
forward freely
16 NOV 2015
David WEISBROT AM (david.weisbrot@gmail.com)
Chairman, AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL (info@presscouncil.org.au)
Prof Emeritus, Law School, The University of Sydney (law.info@sydney.edu.au)
copies:
Warwick ANDERSON AM
CEO, National Health & Medical Research Council (warwick.anderson@nhmrc.gov.au)
Robert Shelton FRENCH
Chief Judge, High Court of Australia (frenchcj@hcourt.gov.au)
Richard GILBERT
CEO, Rule of Law Institute, Australia (RichardG@slaw.com.au)
Michael KIRBY AC
Judge (ret), High Court of Australia (mail@michaelkirby.com.au)
John McCARTHY QC
Barrister, Wentworth Chambers, Sydney (john.mccarthy@5wentworth.com.au)
Jacqui PARK
CEO, Walkley Foundation for Journalism (jpark@alliance.org.au)
Ronald TRENT
Prof & Chair, Human Genetics Advisory Committee of the NHMRC
Prof, Molecular Genetics, The University of Sydney (ronald.trent@sydney.edu.au)
Laurie WILSON
President, National Press Club (npc@npc.org.au)
TODAY, I received an email from the law school at The University of Sydney. Unsubscribe was the essence. But that school has never subscribed to anything from me. Nor has this writer ever subscribed to anything from that school. But it seems what was meant is stop sending emails to you - Professor Emeritus David Weisbrot - care of that school.
Now why would the law school at one of Australia's more respected universities not just forward those emails to you? Until today, your email address has been unknown to me. So to get copies of my emails (see copy of one below) to you, they were sent to said school and of course to the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL. And for the record, you have not replied to one of my emails - not one. But surely you know "facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored," as Aldous Huxley told us.
TODAY, an email was received from a barrister. Not one of those bullshitting barristers, but a very supportive one - especially when it comes to the Port Arthur incident. Here are some words from that email:
"I remember the words of the vice-president of the Bar saying 'I wouldn't want to get involved with that case.' Barristers and judges have seen enough evidence in their careers to figure out what went on at Port Arthur, they also know the implications.
Rocking the boat on Port Arthur is not only a career killer, but potentially worse."
Now what might that vice-president of that Bar, and you, know about the official killing (28 April 1996) at Port Arthur in Tasmania? Are you both trying to ignore the same facts? The same true facts? Methinks so. But "facts are stubborn things," as Tobias Smollett told us in the 18th century. Ignore them at your peril.
TODAY, I checked two Internet sites where your photojournalist mate Gary Ramage has posted his images of what he has identified as a "caged circus animal." He still has those images posted and he is still selling them with your approval. Have a look for yourself: Gary Ramage, Twitter, Sep 12 & Gary Ramage, newspix.com.au Martin Bryant. This Walkley award winning photojournalist and his unethical (and criminal?) behaviour has been the subject of emails, copies of which were directed to you. You have ignored them. The AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL has done nothing about Ramage's appalling behaviour. But if his employer News Corp Australia has got you by the gonads, then you can't.
Recall the Submission Document (27 SEP 2015; copies murder.research@gmail.com) that was directed to the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL. It details pages and pages of codes and guidelines applicable in Australia all of which regulate how human beings are to be treated - human beings like mentally-handicapped Martin Bryant now wrongly imprisoned in Risdon Prison near Hobart in Tasmania.
Do you care to recall that 21-page document? Do you care to recall those codes and guidelines? Or by ignoring it all, do you think the facts that apply to you and the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL will disappear like a fairy's fart? Just to remind you, and for Readers new on the email lists, here are the names of the bodies, conventions, and institutions that Gary Ramage, News Corp Australia, and their partner in MSM corruption (and crime?) the AUSTRALIA PRESS COUNCIL have wilfully ignored:
- Australian Human Rights Commission (3 separate docs);
- Australian Medical Association;
- Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 1984;
- Media, Entertainment, and Arts Alliance;
- Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia;
- The Mercury newspaper (sic); and yes, even the
- AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL (2 separate docs, see General Principles & Standards of Practice).
So next time you are talking with your mates Anderson, French, Gilbert, Kirby, McCarthy, Park, Trent, and Wilson, tell them that your Gary Ramage, News Corp Australia, and the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL do NOT answer to anyone in Australia. Tell them that: "The Australian Press Council was established in 1976 and is responsible for promoting good standards of media practice." Damn any inconvenient facts. Go ahead, just tell them - especially your mates who title themselves Justice.
TODAY, I asked myself who is this chairman of the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL. Who the hell are you to approve the publishing of images and articles about a mentally-handicapped boy-man who once had an IQ of 66? (What is it now after nearly 20 years of enforced drugging and torture in prison?) How could some legal heavyweight not speak out. Not one word from you about the fact innocent Martin Bryant had NO TRIAL! Not one word from you about the fact there was NO coronial inquest, NO public enquiry, NO royal commission - just big-time lies. So the whole Port Arthur incident has become poisonous, which confirms what Nietzsche told us: "All truths kept silent beome poisonous."
So I did just a little research. And suck my saveloy - what did I find...... How about these words which make up the first paragraph of the executive summary in the report titled: People with an Intellectual Disability and the Criminal Justice System. I kid you not. And who published this report? Well, it was published by the NSW Law Reform Commission. It is their Report 80. So what then are the words in the executive summary of Report 80 that caught my attention?:
"People with an intellectual disability have the potential to be either the victims, perpetrators or witnesses of crimes. The criminal justice system must be able to provide for the fair treatment of all people appearing before it. For this group of people, however, equal treatment alone will not ensure that they are able to exercise their legal rights. More needs to be done to redress the imbalance caused by their lower intellectual abilities, likely communication and other difficulties, the lack of understanding of their disabilities and the discrimination to which they are often subjected. This Report represents the culmination of five years’ investigation by the Commission into the difficulties faced by people with an intellectual disability involved in the criminal justice system. The Commission’s inquiry into this particularly vulnerable group of people arose from concerns about their overrepresentation and unfair treatment in the criminal justice system. In submissions and consultations there was general acceptance by criminal justice system personnel and disability representatives that people with an intellectual disability were disadvantaged in the criminal justice system and that their appropriate treatment raised dilemmas for the system as a whole. As victims, they were not able to bring their abusers to justice and as offenders, they were not receiving appropriate recognition for their intellectual condition."
No decent Australian, no decent person anywhere could dispute the facts and their moral foundations that are obvious in this excutive summary. So who then wrote this fine piece of work for the NSW Law Reform Commission?
Well, well, well.... lo and behold. It seems the primary authors of it are - I kid you not - David Weisbrot (professor & commissioner), Brent Fisse (professor & commissioner), Angela Karpin (judge & commissioner), and Michael Tilbury (professor & commissioner). And when did the NSW Law Reform Commission release its Report 80? Well, in 1996.
So either before or after the official massacre at Port Arthur - it matters not which - you David Weisbrot were writing that 1996 report for the NSW Law Reform Commission in which that commendable executive summary appears. But really - that's all it was to you. Just writing. Just empty words.
Since the official killing at Port Arthur, you have confirmed your hypocrisy to the whole nation, to the world. So righteous, so moral, so filled with human compassion, you wrote this in 1996:
"...the lack of understanding of their disabilities and the discrimination to which they are often subjected. This Report represents the culmination of five years’ investigation by the Commission into the difficulties faced by people with an intellectual disability involved in the criminal justice system. The Commission’s inquiry into this particularly vulnerable group of people arose from concerns about their overrepresentation and unfair treatment in the criminal justice system."
But today in 2015, you don't give a rat's ringbit for the innocent and intellectually-disabled Martin Bryant who for nearly 20 years has been tortured in hell. Nowhere have I found one word from you about the fact there was NO TRIAL. Don't say he pleaded guilty - Martin had John Avery's plea rammed down his throat by that criminal of a lawyer. Martin pleaded NOT GUILTY for over six months, until they broke him with isolation and intimidation. And as you know, any person with an IQ as low as 66 should not even have been involved in any pleadings. (Read what Chester Porter QC has exposed about what prosecution officials do to their low IQ victims.) But of course if they could get Avery's guilty plea on record, then theere was the excuse to lock Martin away forever - and they did. Now his family, the media, investigators, etc. cannot speak with him and ask Martin to relate his story - tell us who Tiger was. Officials can't have any more inconvenient facts exposing the lies in the official narrative. Just trying to keep Mick/Rick Dyson - a/the shooter inside Seascape Cottage it seems - silent before he spills the beans is a big problem for officials.
When you as a lawyer, a law expert, and the holder of a DJ (Doctor Juris) degree should have been screaming INJUSTICE, you have said nothing. You are a hypocritcal gutless mongrel. When innocent Martin dies - it is believed they will kill him - your failure to act, your failure to utter a single word in his support and the support of Justice, will haunt you. It is my hope that every day before you shuffle off this mortal coil, filthy slimy worms of guilt and shame will eat your guts out.
(And finally for the other Readers of this email, later today I will finalize the A$20,000 Reward poster to be released internationally next week - after 22 NOV 2015. Let's see if anyone can replicate the despicable images Gary Ramage, News Corp Australia, and the AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL have published and/or promoted in Australia. And if no one can, from that hill 600 meters away overlooking Risdon Prison, replicate the meshed enclosure images alleged taken by Ramage, then we will be able to say David Weisbrot is an accessory to the killing of Martin Bryant. Also check out gumshoenews.com which is exposing a lot about many hot subjects - including the official massacre at Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia.)
Sincerely,
Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7
1030 Vienna, Austria
43-1-9712401
related writings
LEAKED DOCUMENTS:
Statements of Port Arthur Massacre Witnesses
(leaked from DPP Office, Hobart, Tasmania)
2015; 122 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
SUBMISSION DOCUMENT TO AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL:
News Corp Australia Articles Inciting Hatred & Killing
27 SEP 2015; 21 pp.
free pdfs: murder.research@gmail.com
THE WORST OF BRITISH JUSTICE:
Readings Related to Injustice in Australia
(66 Readings; 80 Inserts; 100 authors)
2015; 2nd edition; 796 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
MASS MURDER:
Official Killing in Tasmania, Australia
2014; 2nd edition; 696 pp.
free pdfs: BIGWORMBOOKS@gmx.net
paperbacks: bookfinder.com
Sincerely,
Copy link
Facebook
WhatsApp
X
Email