MALAYSIA IS WATCHING: This is no longer a trial, it is a violation of human rights.

Three years ago, Patrick Khoo (fondly known as Uncle Khoo) stood up to protect the voiceless. On the night of March 22, 2023, while at his own factory premises, he witnessed a harsh stray dog-catching operation conducted by the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ). He didn't use violence—he used his presence to shield the animals he cared for. In return, he was struck across the face with a metal loop pole by an enforcement officer, leaving him with documented injuries to his jaw and wrist.

Today, the victim has become the accused. Despite the CCTV footage showing provocation and physical abuse by the officers, Uncle Khoo is the one being dragged through an unnecessary three-year legal battle under Section 186 of the Penal Code.

A Humanitarian Crisis, Not Just a Legal Case
The three-year drag of this case has done what the initial incident could not, it has broken Uncle Khoo’s health. Since the case began, Uncle Khoo has suffered multiple strokes and a total physical collapse. He is now non-ambulatory, wheelchair-bound, and resides in a nursing home requiring 24-hour specialised care. His cognitive decline is so severe that he can no longer remember much, let alone the details of the traumatic incident or provide clear instructions to his lawyers.

Why This Trial Must End NOW

1. It is Oppressive and Unconscionable: Forcing an incapacitated stroke survivor to stand trial for a minor, three-year-old offence is a form of state-sanctioned cruelty.
2. No Public Interest: Prosecution policy dictates that the law should not be used to crush the frail and elderly for summary offences. The state gains nothing by convicting a man in a nursing home.
3. Abuse of Process: The legal system, meant to protect the vulnerable, has instead become the instrument of Uncle Khoo’s physical and mental decline.

Our firm and kind request to the Attorney General of Malaysia:
We, the undersigned, strongly urge the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) and the Honourable Court to exercise their discretion under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution and Section 254 of the Criminal Procedure Code to:

• Review, refine, consider, and immediately discontinue all charges against Patrick Khoo.
• Grant a Discharge Amounting to an Acquittal (DAA) on humanitarian and procedural grounds.

Uncle Khoo defended the innocent lives of God's creation. Now, it is our turn to defend his human rights to live his remaining days in peace. He has already "served" a sentence of three years of extreme psychological stress that has stolen his health and dignity.

Do not let the threat of unjust legal punishment hang over him any longer. End this oppression. Let Uncle Khoo live his remaining days in peace.

__________________________________

 

MALAYSIA SEDANG MEMERHATI: Ini bukan lagi sekadar perbicaraan, ini adalah pencabulan hak asasi manusia.

Tiga tahun lalu, Patrick Khoo (lebih dikenali sebagai Uncle Khoo) bangkit mempertahankan makhluk yang tidak berdosa. Pada malam 22 Mac 2023, di premis kilangnya sendiri, beliau telah menyaksikan operasi tangkapan anjing jalanan yang kasar. Beliau tidak menggunakan kekerasan—sebaliknya, beliau hanya menggunakan kehadirannya untuk melindungi haiwan-haiwan yang dijaganya. Sebagai balasan, kepalanya telah dipukul dengan batang besi penjerat anjing oleh seorang pegawai penguatkuasa, menyebabkan kecederaan fizikal pada bahagian rahang dan pergelangan tangannya.

Hari ini, mangsa telah menjadi tertuduh. Walaupun rakaman CCTV jelas menunjukkan provokasi dan kekasaran fizikal oleh pihak penguatkuasa, Uncle Khoo adalah individu yang diheret dalam kancah perundangan selama 3 tahun di bawah Seksyen 186 Kanun Keseksaan.

Krisis Kemanusiaan, Bukan Sekadar Kes Perundangan
Kes yang sudah melarat selama tiga tahun ini telah menyebabkan sesuatu yang tidak mampu dilakukan oleh insiden asal: ia telah meranapkan kesihatan Uncle Khoo. Sejak kes ini bermula, Uncle Khoo telah mengalami serangan strok berulang kali dan mengalami kejatuhan tahap kesihatan fizikal yang total. Beliau kini tidak mampu bergerak sendiri, terlantar di kerusi roda, dan menetap di rumah penjagaan yang memerlukan jagaan pakar 24 jam. Kemerosotan kognitifnya sangat serius sehingga beliau tidak lagi mampu mengingati butiran kejadian atau memberikan arahan yang jelas kepada peguamnya.

Mengapa Perbicaraan Ini Mesti Dihentikan SEKARANG:

1. Ia Menindas dan Tidak Munasabah: Memaksa seorang mangsa strok yang terlantar untuk menghadapi perbicaraan bagi kesalahan kecil yang berlaku 3 tahun lalu adalah satu bentuk kekejaman yang direstui oleh negara.
2. Tiada Kepentingan Awam: Polisi pendakwaan menetapkan bahawa undang-undang tidak sepatutnya digunakan untuk menghancurkan warga emas yang uzur bagi kesalahan-kesalahan ringan. Negara tidak mendapat sebarang faedah dengan menyabitkan kesalahan terhadap seorang lelaki yang kini di rumah penjagaan.
3. Penyalahgunaan Proses: Sistem perundangan yang sepatutnya melindungi golongan rentan, sebaliknya telah menjadi instrumen kepada kemerosotan fizikal dan mental Uncle Khoo.
   
   

Permohonan tegas dan tulus kami kepada Peguam Negara Malaysia:
Kami, yang menandatangani petisyen ini, menggesa Jabatan Peguam Negara (AGC) dan Mahkamah Yang Mulia untuk menggunakan budi bicara di bawah Perkara 145(3) Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan Seksyen 254 Kanun Prosedur Jenayah untuk:

• Meneliti, menghalusi, mempertimbangkan dan menghentikan serta-merta semua pertuduhan terhadap Patrick Khoo.
• Memberikan pelepasan seolah-olah pembebasan (DAA) atas dasar kemanusiaan dan prosedur.

Uncle Khoo mempertahankan nyawa makhluk ciptaan Tuhan yang tidak berdosa. Kini, giliran kita untuk mempertahankan hak asasi beliau untuk menjalani sisa hidupnya dalam ketenangan. Beliau telah pun "menjalani" hukuman selama tiga tahun dalam tekanan psikologi melampau yang telah merampas kesihatan dan maruah beliau.

Jangan biarkan ancaman berterusan ini menghantui beliau lagi. Hentikan penindasan ini. Biarkan Uncle Khoo menjalani sisa-sisa hidupnya dengan aman.

 

Terima Kasih for your attention and support!

#KeadilanUntukUncleKhoo #HentikanPenindasan #HakAsasiMalaysia #JusticeForUncleKhoo #StopTheOppression #HumanRightsMalaysia #StandWithUncleKhoo

References:

1. CCTV footage of the incident.
2. 69-year-old pleads not guilty to obstructing MBPJ officer (The Vibes, 31 March 2023). Coverage of Uncle Khoo’s first court appearance and his plea of not guilty.
3. No Action Taken On MBPJ Officer Who Allegedly “Roughed Up” Senior Citizen (The Rakyat Post, 11 April 2023). MBPJ announced that an internal probe found the contact "unintentional" and no disciplinary action would be taken against the officer.
4. PJ dog case: Senior citizen to submit representation to drop charge (Malay Mail, 17 Nov 2023). Early efforts by the defense to have the case dropped on the grounds that the original complainant (the officer) had withdrawn the report.
5. AGC rejects representation to drop charge against elderly man (Malaysiakini, 23 Feb 2024). Despite the MBPJ officer withdrawing his police report, the Attorney General’s Chambers decided to proceed with the prosecution.
6. MBPJ dogcatcher tells court he followed SOP, denies assault (The Star, 14 May 2025). The complainant, Azizul Azzim Norehan, testified that he followed SOPs. Uncle Khoo appeared in a wheelchair and was unable to speak clearly due to his stroke.
7. Court to rule in senior citizen’s dog round-up obstruction case (FMT, 26 Sept 2025). Reports on the close of the prosecution's case. Uncle Khoo, 71, arrived in a wheelchair.
8. Senior citizen’s defence called in MBPJ dog round-up obstruction case (FMT, 17 Oct 2025).The Magistrate’s Court ordered Uncle Khoo to enter his defense after ruling the prosecution established a prima facie case. Trial dates were set for December 18–19, 2025.
9. Please, have compassion on Uncle Patrick Khoo (Malaysiakini, 5 May 2023). An open letter arguing that Uncle Khoo was a rescuer acting on reflex and compassion, calling the prosecution a "crisis in the making."
10. Animal Justice: The Brutality Strays Face at the Hands of Law Enforcement (Wiki Impact, April 2023). A detailed analysis of the incident, the viral CCTV footage, and the broader implications for animal welfare laws in Malaysia.

----------------------------------------

If this case made you wonder, do learn more about the...

Legal Considerations & Overall Outlook
It is vital for every supporter to understand the legal framework and the "two-front" battle we are facing.

Part A: The Criminal Case (Immediate Priority)  
Our absolute focus is to stop the prosecution of a 71-year-old stroke survivor who is medically unfit to stand trial.

• Constitutional Prerogative (Art. 145(3)): The Attorney General (AG) has the absolute power to discontinue this case. We are calling for a Discharge Amounting to an Acquittal (DAA) under Section 254 CPC. A mere pause (DNAA) is insufficient; Uncle Khoo deserves permanent peace.
• Procedural Barrier (Section 342 CPC): Legally, a trial cannot proceed if the accused is "incapable of making his defense." Due to neurological decline from multiple strokes, Uncle Khoo cannot provide instructions to counsel. To continue is a breach of the Right to a Fair Trial (Art. 5 Federal Constitution).
   

Part B: Accountability & Civil Action (The Long Game)
While the criminal case is the immediate priority, it is also laying the groundwork to hold MBPJ and the officers involved accountable for the "gangster-like" conduct evident in the CCTV recording.

• Vicarious Liability: MBPJ is legally responsible for the wrongful acts (Assault, Battery, and Negligence) of its employees during their duty.
• Misfeasance in Public Office: Seek to prove the officer acted with "malice" or exceeded legal powers by using a loop pole as a weapon against a senior citizen.
• Judicial Review: MBPJ to disclose SOPs, Training Records, and Duty Rosters through a court-ordered "Discovery" process.

A Call for Collective Interest
Pursuing a civil suit against a public authority like MBPJ is heavy on time, legal expertise, and financial resources. Under the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948, there is a strict deadline: Legal action must be filed by 22 March 2026(36 months from the incident).

To Legal Firms & Advocates: If there is a collective interest in pursuing Part B as a "Public Interest Litigation" to ensure MBPJ and similar entities are held to account for its lack of SOPs and training, please get in touch. Combining resources will ensure this case sets a precedent for how citizens—especially our elders—are treated by local enforcement.

Know Your Rights: Dealing with Local Enforcement
While we fight for Uncle Khoo, we must ensure the public is empowered.

• Right to Identification: Officers must provide identification and state their unit.
• Private Property Limits: Enforcement entry into private premises generally requires specific authorization or a warrant unless there is an immediate threat.
• Proportional Force: Any physical force used must be strictly proportional. The use of animal control tools on humans is a gross violation of SOP.

The Current Game Plan: Sanity vs. Ego
Our immediate priority remains Part A: Securing a DAA (Discharge Amounting to an Acquittal) from the Attorney General and the Court. We are essentially asking the state to perform the radical act of "not being cruel" to a 71-year-old stroke survivor.

Once Uncle Khoo is legally safe from this over 1,000-day-long exercise in futility, we can pivot to the civil accountability phase. If the authorities find the court process "taxing," they should prepare for the alternative: a public that actually remembers. If the system continues to protect "gangster-like" ego over basic human dignity, the remedy is simple: Vote accordingly. In the next General Election, let’s save our ballots for those who can distinguish "good governance" from "ignorant injustice." If they cannot handle the weight of an SOP or the fragility of a senior citizen’s life, they certainly should n’t be handling the weight of administrating a nation or even a city.

A nation's strength is measured not by the ego of its administrators, but by their empathy and professional competence. We must now move beyond rhetoric and demand that these qualities become the baseline for public service.

__________________________________

Jika kes ini membuatkan anda berfikir, sila teliti dengan lebih mendalam tentang...

Pertimbangan Perundangan & Tinjauan Keseluruhan
Adalah sangat penting bagi setiap penyokong untuk memahami rangka kerja undang-undang dan "pertempuran dua hala" yang sedang dihadapi.

Bahagian A: Kes Jenayah (Keutamaan Segera)
Fokus mutlak kami adalah untuk menghentikan pendakwaan terhadap seorang pesakit strok berusia 71 tahun yang secara perubatan tidak layak untuk dibicarakan.

• Prerogatif Perlembagaan (Perkara 145(3)): Peguam Negara mempunyai kuasa mutlak untuk menghentikan kes ini. Kami menuntut Pelepasan Seolah-olah Pembebasan (DAA)di bawah Seksyen 254 KPJ. Sekadar penangguhan sementara (DNAA) adalah tidak mencukupi; Uncle Khoo berhak mendapat ketenangan yang kekal.
• Halangan Prosedur (Seksyen 342 KPJ): Dari segi undang-undang, perbicaraan tidak boleh diteruskan jika tertuduh "tidak berupaya untuk membuat pembelaan." Akibat kemerosotan neurologi daripada serangan strok berulang, Uncle Khoo tidak mampu memberikan arahan kepada peguam. Meneruskan kes ini adalah satu pelanggaran kepada Hak untuk Perbicaraan yang Adil (Perkara 5 Perlembagaan Persekutuan).
   

Bahagian B: Akauntabiliti & Tindakan Sivil (Rancangan Jangka Panjang)
Walaupun kes jenayah adalah keutamaan segera, ia juga menjadi asas untuk menuntut pertanggungjawaban daripada MBPJ dan pegawai yang terlibat atas tingkah laku "ala gangster" yang jelas terakam dalam rakaman CCTV.

• Liabiliti Vikarius: MBPJ bertanggungjawab secara sah ke atas tindakan salah (Serangan, Pukulan, dan Kecuaian) kakitangan mereka semasa menjalankan tugas.
• Salah Laku dalam Jawatan Awam (Misfeasance in Public Office): Berusaha untuk membuktikan pegawai tersebut bertindak dengan "niat jahat" atau melampaui kuasa sah dengan menggunakan alat penjerat haiwan sebagai senjata terhadap seorang warga emas.
• Semakan Kehakiman: Memaksa MBPJ mendedahkan SOP, Rekod Latihan, dan Jadual Bertugas melalui proses "Penzahiran" (Discovery) atas arahan mahkamah.

 
Seruan untuk Kepentingan Kolektif
Meneruskan saman sivil terhadap pihak berkuasa awam seperti MBPJ memerlukan banyak masa, kepakaran undang-undang, dan sumber kewangan yang besar. Di bawah Akta Perlindungan Pihak Berkuasa Awam 1948, terdapat tempoh masa yang ketat: Tindakan undang-undang mesti difailkan sebelum 22 Mac 2026 (36 bulan dari tarikh kejadian).

Kepada Firma Guaman & Para Peguam Bela: Jika terdapat minat kolektif untuk meneruskan Bahagian B sebagai "Litigasi Kepentingan Awam" bagi memastikan MBPJ dan entiti serupa bertanggungjawab atas kegagalan SOP dan latihan mereka, sila hubungi kami. Menggembleng sumber akan memastikan kes ini menjadi duluan (precedent) tentang bagaimana rakyat—terutamanya warga emas kita—dilayan oleh pihak berkuasa tempatan.
 
Kenali Hak Anda: Berdepan dengan Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan
Sambil kita berjuang untuk Uncle Khoo, kita mesti memastikan orang awam diperkasakan.

• Hak Pengenalan Diri: Pegawai mesti memberikan pengenalan diri dan menyatakan unit mereka.
• Had Premis Persendirian: Kemasukan pihak berkuasa ke premis persendirian secara amnya memerlukan kebenaran khusus atau waran, melainkan terdapat ancaman serta-merta.
• Kekerasan Berpatutan: Sebarang kekerasan fizikal yang digunakan mestilah benar-benar berpatutan. Penggunaan alat kawalan haiwan ke atas manusia adalah pelanggaran SOP yang amat berat.

 
Rancangan Semasa: Kewarasan lwn Ego
Keutamaan segera kami kekal pada Bahagian A: Mendapatkan DAA (Pelepasan Seolah-olah Pembebasan) daripada Peguam Negara dan Mahkamah. Kita sebenarnya sedang meminta negara untuk melakukan tindakan radikal iaitu: "jangan bersikap kejam" terhadap seorang mangsa strok berusia 71 tahun.

Sebaik sahaja Uncle Khoo selamat dari segi undang-undang daripada urusan sia-sia yang berlarutan lebih 1,000 hari ini, kita boleh beralih ke fasa akauntabiliti sivil. Jika pihak berkuasa merasakan proses mahkamah itu "meletihkan," mereka harus bersedia untuk alternatifnya: rakyat yang benar-benar tidak lupa. Jika sistem terus melindungi ego "ala gangster" berbanding maruah manusia, ubatnya mudah: Undi dengan bijak. Dalam Pilihan Raya Umum akan datang, mari kita simpan undi kita untuk mereka yang tahu membezakan "tadbir urus yang baik" daripada "ketidakadilan yang jahat." Jika mereka tidak mampu memikul beban sesuatu SOP atau kerapuhan nyawa seorang warga emas, mereka pastinya tidak layak memikul beban mentadbir sebuah negara, malah sebuah bandar sekalipun.

Kekuatan sesebuah negara tidak diukur melalui keangkuhan para pentadbirnya, sebaliknya melalui empati dan kecekapan profesional mereka. Kita kini perlu melangkau lebih daripada sekadar retorik dan menuntut agar kualiti-kualiti ini dijadikan piawaian asas dalam perkhidmatan awam.

 

📢 IMPORTANT: REGARDING DONATIONS - You do not need to donate to sign this petition. Donations on this platform go to Change.org (for advertising), not to Uncle Khoo or any legal fund. Please support for FREE by signing and sharing this link.

 __________________________________

 📢 PENTING: MENGENAI DERMA - Anda tidak perlu menderma untuk menandatangani petisyen ini. Wang derma di platform ini pergi ke Change.org (untuk iklan), dan bukan kepada Uncle Khoo atau mana-mana tabung guaman. Sila sokong secara PERCUMA dengan menandatangani dan menyebarkan pautan ini.