Plots Against a Canadian Muslim Mother in Niqab and Her Three Children – Including a 6-Year-Old Girl at Risk of Losing Her Residency – Due to Racism in London, Ontario Family Court

FC- 22-00001068-0000 / Superior Court of Justice – Family Branch / 80 Dundas Street, London, Ontario, N6A 6A3)

Some racist judges, driven by prejudice against Sunni Muslims, are attempting to undermine Canada’s image of justice. They fail to recognize that it is they who have violated the law, they who have crossed the boundaries of respect for the Crown, and they who ultimately lack authority over even themselves.

Why? Because they lack the fundamental ability to respect work ethics, the laws of Canada, and the very foundation upon which this country stands—its reliance on God and respect for the law. Instead, they have followed their own interests, racism, and hatred toward Muslims Sunnah who are practicing their freedom in Canada—those biased judges, courthouse staff, and lawyers in my case are defying the law itself and dishonoring its principles.

"What happened with the Indigenous people was neither her fault nor the fault of those who are striving for a better change in Canada under the umbrella of justice. However, if this issue is ignored and not resolved as soon as possible, unfortunately, it will be because of you and your neglect. Any harm that may happen to my three children or to me personally will be your fault."

I have followed all official procedures to file complaints against the racist officials in Toronto and Ottawa, addressing each matter to the appropriate authority. However, all my complaints were dismissed—not because discrimination or threats to our safety do not exist, but because higher-ranking officials intervened to shut them down.

I have submitted my complaint to the justice system of Canada nearly two years ago. The resolution so far has been merely temporary, aimed at extinguishing the spark that was ignited—under the assumption that this case would be forgotten. However, hatred against Muslims and the deceit of legal professionals who manipulate the law, violating both their own legal system and the ethics of their esteemed positions, will remain a stain of disgrace on this false justice. No matter how much you scheme or plot, ALLAH’s plan will always prevail, and you will be the losers.

Racists,

I have demanded the appointment of an unbiased judge who does not harbor hatred against Muslims for many months. I have previously explained the malicious intentions of the oppressive racists and how they have manipulated and tampered with my case over the years to weaken my position, believing they have the power to do so.

I repeat: you are the person who did not respect the law because you have proven that you neither respect yourselves nor abide by any law or constitution, nor can you even control yourselves. This case has turned into outright hostility against the faith of a woman and her three Sunni children, who follow the beloved and noble Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

Since you insist on this path, then here we are, giving you exactly what you wanted. No matter what happens, no one—no matter who they are—can strip our faith and belief from our hearts.

My case has been tampered with by several judges and court officials. And I say to you, even if your plan is to bypass the law once again to issue a false ruling—just as you have done before—ignoring the facts and evidence while manipulating them, taking advantage of several factors, including:

1.      The motion hearing is not recorded, allowing you to manipulate events, the defense, and the evidence as you please.

2.       You ignore past rulings based on the family’s history over many years, falsely claiming that Canadian law grants rights to the father—who lives outside Canada and has committed fraud against the country—despite the fact that these rights pose a clear danger to the children’s well-being. Also, you claimed that I grant the father consent to solve the disobeying him of the Canadian Orders which issued in Canada. 

3.     You refuse to grant the children their most basic right: to be heard directly in court. What justice!

4.     You disregard the protection granted to us by the Canadian federal government, which confirms the father’s threat to the mother and children.

5.     You ignore all evidence and investigations from CAS, which have proven the father’s danger and the children’s safety with their mother.

6.     Your maliciousness in handling CAS reports is tied to the agreement between CAS and MRCSSI, which affirms that Muslim children have the right to remain in Muslim families of the same faith. By concealing any CAS involvement, suspicions naturally arise regarding the real motives behind your insistence on targeting these children. (God’s plan is always the best and never fails.)

7.     You disregard the assessments of psychiatrists who have monitored the children’s and mother’s mental health since their arrival in Canada, all of whom confirmed the father’s threat and the children’s safety with their mother.

8.     You manipulate court files by either not submitting them to the court or delaying the delivery of orders to the Muslim Sunni mother wearing the niqab, depriving her of her right to appeal or request an urgent order to halt the decision.

9.     You ignore the legal deadlines in Canadian law for serving motions and evidence within the required timeframe—all in favor of the father.

10.  You violate the mother’s right to reject documents submitted beyond the legally mandated deadline, facilitating matters for the father while subjecting the Muslim Sunni mother wearing the niqab to all forms of racism and bias.

11.  You disregard the serious risk to the child Mariam, who urgently requires a custody order to finalize her permanent residency in Canada so she can remain with her mother and siblings, who are Canadian citizens. Mariam lost her health insurance due to her pending residency status in Canada, and immigration authorities require a court order proving custody by no later than March 3, 2025.

12.  Mariam’s passport will expire in seven months, and she will lose her residency status. She will also be unable to renew her visitor visa due to the complex procedures imposed by the racist family court against a Muslim mother wearing the niqab.

13.  The court insists that the mother attend in person instead of via Zoom. If this is part of a scheme similar to what the father did in Kuwait—collaborating with his corrupt friends in the Kuwaiti Ministry of Interior to have the mother imprisoned without cause (accusing her of crimes she did not commit) in order to take the children from her while she was in jail—then shame on you! There is no law in Canada that enforces an immediate ruling without due process and the right to appeal. What happened in Kuwait, where the mother endured two years of injustice before the Kuwaiti court ruled her innocent, will not be forgotten.

14.  The father insists that the mother hand over the children’s passports to the court, even though a final ruling in Canada has proven her innocence of kidnapping charges. The racist judges aiding him by guiding and facilitating these procedures raise suspicions about their true intentions!

15.   Many Muslim families have been subjected to serious abuses, where their children were taken from them, their names changed, and all means of contact severed to prevent their parents from ever finding or reclaiming them. Shame on this fake justice! Shame on you! And I repeat: you chose the wrong children and the wrong case. God is with us, and He is sufficient for us. God’s plan will always prevail.

16.  This case will never be forgotten, no matter what happens or how much you try to silence me. Your racism is clearer than the light of the sun.

Shame will continue to haunt you. No one will ever defeat us or steal our faith from our hearts or from the hearts of children whose belief has been instilled in every drop of blood running through their veins and in every heartbeat they have.

At the mean time, The children's deceitful lawyer claims she will not interfere in this matter, yet she asks the court to compare three different statements from their office, submitted on different dates after the trial. These statements were carefully crafted to contradict each other and mislead the court toward false conclusions.

Wouldn't it be easier to simply grant the children their right to express their own opinions in court and resolve this dispute fairly?

I will see you today at the scheduled hearing at 10 AM.