Few instances where families fined

Target Category A: Arbitrary Policing of Standard Outdoor Furniture & Decor

• Incident 1 (The Covered Grill): A resident hosted a standard Labor Day family celebration and afterward left their small grill on the patio, neatly protected with a proper grill cover. Management immediately assessed a $100 fine on their ledger despite the item being stored safely and cleanly.

• Incident 2 (The Single-Chair Swing): A couple placed a standard, single-chair swing on their private patio to relax outside after work. Management did not spare them, hitting their account with an unleased $100 charge for standard outdoor comfort furniture.

• Incident 3 (The "Inappropriate" Chair): A tenant was issued a $100 fine simply for keeping a normal, functional chair on their patio. Management rejected the furniture under the arbitrary excuse that it was "not an appropriate patio chair," despite the lease containing absolutely no guidelines or approved models.

• Incident 4 (The Empty Flower Pots): Residents were fined $100 for having empty flower pots on their patios between planting seasons. Management arbitrarily designated the empty planters as "trash," penalizing standard gardening upkeep.

• Incident 5 (The Broken Furniture Penalty): A resident with slightly old or worn patio furniture was assessed a $100 fine. Management used the subjective justification that it was "not proper patio furniture," effectively penalizing tenants based on the perceived economic status of their personal property.

🚫 Target Category B: Predatory Fining of Families & Active Children

• Incident 6 : A family with young children was assessed an automatic $100 fine because a few toys were left on their 2nd-floor patio. The children actively play with these items daily on their private balcony, and hauling them up and down three flights of stairs constantly is an impossible standard.

• Incident 7 (The 4th Floor "Invisible" Play Penalty): A family residing on the 4th floor was hit with a $100 fine because management saw children's toys on the balcony. Management issued the fine with zero context, entirely ignoring the fact that children actively live there and use those toys.

• Incident 8 (The 4-Year-Old’s Bicycle): A father teaching his 4-year-old daughter how to ride a bicycle stepped inside their home, temporarily leaving the child’s bike on the patio for immediate future use. Management instantly slapped a $100 fine on the ledger with no warning or window to store the item.

🚫 Target Category C: Penalizing Health, Wellness, & Alternative Transit

• Incident 10 (The Yoga Ball): A resident who occasionally uses a yoga ball on their patio for outdoor stretching and sitting was fined $100. Management claimed a yoga ball is "not approved patio furniture," penalizing basic physical fitness items.

• Incident 11 (The Resting Cyclist): A young adult resident completed a bicycle ride and stepped inside his apartment to rest up, leaving his bike on his private balcony. Management immediately hit his account with a $100 fine, stating bicycles are completely banned from being present on balconies, even temporarily.

From the above incidents its clear how unfair these fees of 100$ is. Add comments and share with family and friends to sign.