Sony’s Court Argument Underscores Why Physical Games Are Preferable for Ownership

Petition Update: Sony’s Court Argument Underscores Why Physical Games Are Preferable for Ownership
Sony has now made an argument in court that further demonstrates the fundamental difference between physical and digital games.

In response to a class-action lawsuit, Sony argued that reasonable consumers could not have believed they were obtaining ownership of a digital game, because digital games are licensed rather than owned. Sony specifically argued that if one customer actually “owned” a digital game, Sony could not subsequently sell that same game to another customer.

While Sony may be correct that purchasing a digital game does not transfer ownership of the game's underlying intellectual property, this argument highlights an important consumer issue: a physical game provides consumers with something a digital license does not — ownership and control of a particular copy that can be transferred to another person.

A physical game can generally be:

Resold when the owner no longer wants it;
Traded for another game;
Given away to a friend or family member;
Kept and used without depending on the continued existence of a digital storefront or account license;
Passed on to another owner rather than remaining permanently tied to the original purchaser.
A digital PlayStation purchase, by contrast, is governed by a license that Sony says is not a sale of the software and is not transferable.

Sony's court argument therefore reinforces what consumers have been saying for years: physical and digital purchases are not equivalent products from an ownership perspective. A physical copy can participate in a second-hand market and can be transferred from one consumer to another. A digital license generally cannot.

This makes the continued availability of physical games an important consumer-rights issue, not merely a matter of nostalgia or preference.

If Sony itself tells a court that consumers cannot reasonably claim ownership of their digital games, then consumers have even more reason to demand access to a format that provides meaningful ownership of their purchased copy.

We therefore urge Sony and the industry to preserve physical game distribution and ensure consumers retain a genuine choice between physical products and non-transferable digital licenses.

Physical ownership should not become a thing of the past simply because digital distribution is more convenient for publishers.

Source:
sony-playstation-digital-ownership-licenses-impossible
sony-digital-playstation-games-licenses-not-owned
playstation-tells-federal-court-that-players-do-not-own-digital-games