The cost to build commercial properties in Idaho is reaching unsustainable heights, particularly due to existing ratio regulations that mandate two apprentices per journeyman in the electrical contracting industry. This outdated rule imposes unnecessary financial pressure on contractors, limiting their flexibility in workforce management, which in turn significantly increases project costs. The disparity in cost between apprenticeships and journeymen is notable, with journeymen commanding almost double the wages of apprentices. Consequently, mandating a low apprentice-to-journeyman ratio forces contractors to hire fewer workers to manage expenses, thereby compromising both safety and efficiency on job sites. More workers can potentially lead to faster project completions and safer environments, as tasks can be divided appropriately among more hands. The state of Idaho, recognized for its independence and innovation in trade practices, should not be hampered by regulations that mimic union rules found in other states. The flexibility for contractors to decide on the number of apprenticeships under the supervision of one journeyman can dramatically improve not just the cost-efficiency but also the quality and safety of construction projects. I'm advocating for the complete removal of the ratio rule in Idaho. By allowing contractors to assign multiple apprentices to a single journeyman, without restrictions, we can reduce costs, enhance safety, and boost construction efficiency in the state. Let us allow Idaho’s contractors the freedom to operate without unnecessary constraints and foster a thriving construction environment. Join me in this important initiative to remove ratio rules for electric contractors in Idaho. Sign this petition and contribute to a meaningful change in Idaho's construction industry.