Dear Prime Minister,

 

We, the undersigned, urge you to reconsider and cancel the proposed state visit of Donald Trump to Balmoral. This decision is not made lightly but reflects the deep concerns of many citizens regarding the implications of such a visit.

 

**Reasons for Opposition:**

 

1. **Threats and Attacks on Canada:** Donald Trump has repeatedly made disparaging remarks about Canada, a Commonwealth realm under the King, and has threatened trade relations with the country. More alarmingly, his statements have included suggestions of potential military action against Canada, a direct threat to the security of the King's overseas realms. Such rhetoric undermines the cooperative relationship that should exist between allied nations and poses significant risks of conflict. As a guardian of the Commonwealth, the UK has an imperative to protect Canada’s sovereignty and ensure its safety from unwarranted aggression. Hosting Donald Trump would send the wrong message, appearing to endorse threats against the King's overseas realms rather than firmly rejecting them.

 

2. **Anti-Ukraine Propaganda:** Donald Trump has repeatedly made statements that undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and its right to defend itself against Russian aggression. For example, he has falsely claimed that Ukraine "started" the war with Russia and suggested that the conflict could have been avoided if Ukraine had made territorial concessions. Additionally, he has criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, distorting facts and aligning with pro-Russian narratives that threaten global stability.

 

3. **Pro-Putin Sentiments and Alleged Russian Ties:** Donald Trump has faced widespread criticism for his perceived alignment with Vladimir Putin and policies that many view as favorable to Russian interests. Allegations of his being a "Russian asset" have further fueled concerns about his commitment to Western alliances and democratic principles. Hosting him at Balmoral risks legitimizing these controversial ties and undermining the UK's position on international security.

 

4. **Illegal Deportation of Asylum Seekers:** During his presidency, Donald Trump implemented policies that led to the deportation of asylum seekers, often in violation of international human rights standards. These actions have been widely condemned for their lack of due process and disregard for the safety of vulnerable individuals. Such policies are incompatible with the values of compassion and justice that the UK upholds.

 

5. **Attempts to Seize Power in 2020:** Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Donald Trump engaged in efforts to overturn the election results, including promoting baseless claims of voter fraud and pressuring officials to alter vote counts. His actions culminated in the January 6 Capitol insurrection, a direct attack on democratic institutions. These attempts to undermine democracy raise serious concerns about his respect for the rule of law.

 

6. **Current Statements Indicating Attempts to Stay in Power:** Donald Trump has made alarming statements suggesting he may seek ways to remain in power beyond his second term. Such rhetoric challenges constitutional limits and raises fears of authoritarianism. Hosting him at Balmoral could be perceived as endorsing these dangerous ambitions.

 

7. **Anti-European and Anti-British Comments:** Donald Trump has consistently displayed hostility toward Europe and the UK. He has referred to the European Union as an "enemy" and has imposed tariffs on British steel and aluminum exports, harming UK industries. His dismissive remarks about NATO and his threats to withdraw U.S. support for the alliance have undermined transatlantic security. Additionally, his criticism of British leaders and policies has strained relations between the two nations. Hosting him at Balmoral risks further alienating European allies and damaging the UK's reputation on the global stage.

 

8. **Erosion of International Norms:** Donald Trump's actions and rhetoric have often undermined international norms and agreements, such as withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran Nuclear Deal. These decisions have had far-reaching consequences for global stability and cooperation. Hosting him at Balmoral could be seen as condoning such behavior, which runs counter to the UK's commitment to multilateralism and international law.

 

9. **Public Sentiment:** A significant portion of the British public has expressed opposition to previous state visits by Donald Trump. Allowing this visit to proceed risks further alienating citizens and fostering division. The government and Royal Household should consider the voices of the people and act in accordance with their concerns.

 

10. **Diplomatic Concerns:** While maintaining strong UK-US relations is vital, this visit could strain relationships with other nations and communities affected by Trump's policies. Prioritizing diplomacy that fosters unity and respect among nations is essential.

 

11. **Financial Implications:** State visits are costly affairs, with millions spent on security and ceremonial arrangements. At a time when public funds are stretched, this expenditure may not be justifiable, especially given the widespread opposition to the visit.

 

12. **Symbolic Impact:** Balmoral is a symbol of British heritage and values. Hosting a figure as polarizing as Donald Trump risks tarnishing the reputation of this historic site and the principles it represents. The UK must ensure that its actions align with its commitment to inclusivity, respect, and democracy.

 

**A Reasonable Alternative Course of Action:**  

Instead of a state visit to Balmoral, we propose that any diplomatic engagement with Donald Trump be conducted in a more neutral and less symbolic setting, such as a private meeting at a government office. This would allow for necessary discussions on UK-US relations without the ceremonial endorsement that a state visit implies. Such an approach would demonstrate the UK's commitment to maintaining diplomatic ties while addressing the legitimate concerns of its citizens and allies. Furthermore, it would send a clear message that threats to the King's overseas realms and the erosion of international norms will not be endorsed or legitimized.

 

We believe that the values of inclusivity, respect, and democracy should guide decisions about state visits. By canceling this visit and opting for a more measured alternative, the UK can send a clear message about its commitment to these principles and its dedication to protecting the interests of its citizens and allies.

 

We respectfully request that this matter be reconsidered in light of the concerns outlined above.

 

Yours sincerely,