TO THE NEIGHBORS AND NEIGHBORS OF COSTA ESURI

BETWEEN JULIO DOMARCO AND I HAVE WRITTEN I DO NOT KNOW HOW MANY WRITINGS REQUESTING INFORMATION TO ALL PEOPLE AND ENTITIES THAT CAN INTERVENE WITH THE EUC OF COSTA ESURI.

ALMOST NEVER ANSWERED US, EXCEPT ONCE OR TWICE. BUT WHO HAS NOT ANSWERED EVER, BUT NEVER, HAS BEEN THE MAYOR.

THE ADMINISTRATOR OF MADRID OF THE EUC SEEMED THAT HE FOLLOWED THE SAME STEPS OF THE MAYOR. DO NOT ANSWER ANYTHING. IT SEEMS THAT IT HAD THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS 'CUSTOM OF THE NEGATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE SILENCE. WHAT YOU CAN NOT STOP ANSWERING A BUROFAX.

THE BUROFAX, WHICH COMMANDED HIM JULIO DOMARCO, HAS ALREADY HAD ANSWER

FINALLY, SOMEONE WHO ANSWERS! THE ANSWERS ARE ESCUETAS, BUT DO NOT CONVINCE US.

FIRST, WE ARE TOLD "CURRENTLY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO EXHIBIT THE BOOK OF RECORDS, SINCE IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNING COUNCIL, DOÑA MARINA MARTÍNEZ, TO WHOM YOUR RETURN HAS BEEN REQUIRED, WITHOUT, UNTIL THE DATE, HAVE HAD A PLACE "(INTEGRAL COPY OF THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THE ADMINISTRATOR'S RESPONSE).

WE ASK HOW THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN. PERHAPS AS THE MAYOR SAID, AT THE MEETING OF JULY 26, 2018 AT THE GOLF CLUB BEFORE A FEW THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE AND REPRODUCED BY WAX:
"Mayor: What Marina has said is that she wants the minutes, the books and such, that being the Secretary is entitled to it, I want you to know that the EUC Administration Attorneys have sued Marina because she took the record books and is putting minutes as she considers, so it will have to be seen before the judge. "(Literal quote, in one of its paragraphs, the summary of the intervention of the Mayor who sent CERA to its partners).

OR THE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN OTHERWISE? AND IF IT IS IN ANOTHER WAY, THEN DOES NOT ALL THE TRUTH SAY THE LORD MAYOR?

WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLARIFY ALL OWNERS AND OWNERS HOW HAS THAT REQUIREMENT BEEN FOR SOMETHING WE PAY FOR? DO WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW?

IN THE SECOND PLACE, WE DO NOT REQUEST THE DATA OF THE PEOPLE WHO PAY THE FEE OF OUR COMMUNITY, ALBATROS GOLF I, BUT THE NUMBER OF OWNERS WHO ARE CURRENTLY PAYING THE FEES OF THE EUC OF COSTA ESURI, WHICH WILL MATRIX A COEFFICIENT AT THE TIME OF VOTING, THAT THE PRESIDENT OF OUR COMMUNITY, DON JULIO DOMARCO MORALES, OBSTITS THE REPRESENTATIVITY TO VOTE IN THE ASSEMBLIES.

IT RESULTS THAT IN THE LAST ASSEMBLY, IT HAS VOTED WITH A COEFFICIENT OF 0.069. WE ASK TWO THINGS:

FIRST, SINCE 2015 THE COEFFICIENT OF OUR COMMUNITY LOW OF 0.26 OF 2015, 0.4888 IN 2016, 0.5057 IN 2017 AND 0.06970.

WITH THESE DATA, THE COEFFICIENT HAS DROWN A LOT FROM 2015, AND, ESPECIALLY, FROM 2017 WITH A 0.5057 TO 0.06970 OF 2018

IT DOES NOT SEEM RARE THAT YOU GIVE ONE DOWN A YEAR THE FOLLOWING! THEN WE ARE TOLD THAT EVERY MORE OWNERS OR OWNERS PAY THEIR FEES. THEN WHY HAS THE COEFFICIENT LOWERED FROM A 7.26 TIMES OF THE YEAR TO 2018?

WITH THIS INFORMATION, IT LEADS TO MANY POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS:

-UNA, THAT MANY NEIGHBORS AND NEIGHBORS OF OUR COMMUNITY HAVE STOPPED TO PAY.

-DOS, THAT HAVE SET A COEFFICIENT WRONG OR ALLEGEDLY FALSE.

-TRES, WHICH DO NOT HAVE AN IDEA OF WHO PAYS AND WHO DOES NOT.

WE HAVE REQUESTED OUR NEIGHBORS AND NEIGHBORS, UNDER THE DATA PROTECTION ACT, WHO PAY. WE HAVE A PROBLEM, THE COEFFICIENT THAT LEAVES US, FOR EXAMPLE, IS FULLY DIFFERENT IN THE LAST TWO YEARS. THIS SEEMS TO US SEEK THAT THERE IS NOT A SERIOUSNESS WITH THE DATA AND THAT THE COEFFICIENTS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE REALITY CAN IT BE WHAT WE HAVE VOTED WITH LESS COEFFICIENTS OF THE ONE THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE RESIDENTIAL SET ALBATROS GOLF I? IF SO, VOTES MUST BE CONTESTED BY POSSIBLE "FALSITY" IN THE VOTES. WE WOULD ASK THE OTHER PRESIDENTS OR PRESIDENTS OF COMMUNITIES IF THEY HAVE NOT RAISED IF THEY VOTE WITH A REAL COEFFICIENT. IF I WERE A NEIGHBOR OR NEIGHBOR OF ANOTHER COMMUNITY, I WOULD ASK THEIR REPRESENTATIVES IF THE PERCENTAGE OF VOTE IS CORRECT, THAT THEY FIND OUT AND IF IT IS NOT, ITSELF TO BE CHALLENGED THE VOTES AND ASSEMBLIES, ASKING FOR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THOSE WHO CORRESPOND, ABOVE ALL, BECAUSE THERE ARE ENTITIES THAT CHARGE FOR SEEING THINGS THAT ARE CORRECT.

 SOME WILL HAVE TO EXPLAIN A LOT OF DATA ALLEGEDLY "FALSE OR ERRONEOUS" AND ASSUMPTION OF POSSIBLE RESPONSIBILITIES.

WHAT LEADS TO THE CONCLUSION THAT EVERYTHING THAT SURROUNDS THE EUC IS CONFUSED AND LITTLE CLEAR. FURTHER INCREASE THE DOUBTS OF PEOPLE WITH THAT SILENCE TO THE INFORMATION REQUESTS TO THE DIFFERENT ADMINISTRACTIONS AND ENTITIES RELATED TO THE EUC.

WITHOUT PUBLIC SERVICES, PAYING AN EXTRA FEE FOR NOTHING AND WITH OSCURANTISM IT WOULD BE FOR PEOPLE TO SAY IN HIGH VOICE:

WE ARE HARDS OF BEING DECEIVED AND HANDLE US!

SO MUCH TO TELL THE TRUTH!