The importance of challenging all false information that put female victims into fear, alarm and distress.
We’ve just been made aware that vindictive comments on social media spread by the David George Morris Facebook group led by his sister Debra Thomas have had a detrimental impact on female abuse C-PTSD victims.
These women already live in extreme daily fear because of the violence towards themselves and their children. Threats on their lives and threats to kill go back as far as 1999 onwards. Reports to police were ignored because the predator is a paid police informer.
Louise was instrumental in helping one of these female victims obtain safe housing, etc. This person lives in daily fear for her life. The lies spread about Louise, including misinformation, hatred and lies, put a female victim of extreme violence into a state of isolation, fear and CPTSD. This is because Louise is one of her safe persons, someone who she trusted.
Louise was only one, of not many, helping this person seek support. Louise put her neck on the line to help this woman.
This woman’s predator (who has a history of violence towards women and children) was also seeing Mandy Power about seven weeks before she was murdered. His DNA needs to be checked against the unknown male DNA on the murder weapon.
A family member of this female victim screenshot and showed her the misinformation and lies written about Louise, which put this woman into an extreme state of fear and alarm. Due to all the lies written on social media, this woman was encouraged to stay away from Louise Pugh based on the online abuse and hatred perpetrated towards Louise. This led this vulnerable person being cut off from her only support network.
For this reason the misinformation and hatred on social media towards Louise Pugh has to be challenged.
Critical Analysis of the Misinformation
Gary Beynon, close friend of paedophile Christina Pugh - accused Louise Pugh of making money out of the murders
This is absolutely not true. Gary Beynon is unreliable. He is known to have changed his police statements nine months later from stating that Stephen Lewis threatened to kill Mandy aligning to Louise Pugh and Message 23, to all of a sudden saying it was a person that Christina Pugh and her police handlers were trying to set up at that time. (Evidence can be provided).
Addressing the accusation that Louise Pugh did NOT live with Doris, Mandy, Katie and Emily at 9 Kelvin Road.
We have witness statements and recordings of neighbours who verify Louise’s constant presence at 9 Kelvin Road. They state that it was only Louise Pugh and Mandy Power who were there as a constant, doing Doris’ personal care. In another statement, one neighbour said that Doris was never seen being taken out anywhere by anyone and it was always Louise Pugh and Mandy Power who were seeing to Doris’ needs. Evidence for this is provided in court documents which show that it was Louise Pugh who gave Doris her food on Saturday 26th June (as evidenced in police and court documents which state that it was Louise who fed Doris her last meal). Another neighbour on record stated back in 2022, that when her friend Doris fell over, it was Louise Pugh who went over to the neighbour’s house to seek help for Doris.
The neighbour stated that Louise had a key and was looking after Doris at the time. There are also reports that Mandy’s friends and family stopped speaking to Mandy during the months before her murder. It is known that this was due to Christina Pugh’s deliberate trouble making to isolate Mandy away from her family and friends.
In the same way, that one of Louise’s brothers was badly abused, mistreated and neglected by his own mother as a child and he was shown kindness by a family in his neighbourhood up Telford way, Mandy and Doris showed Louise kindness by opening up their home to her when she was abused, mistreated and neglected by her mother in Clydach.
Neighbours at Kelvin Road can verify this fact, along with documents from South Wales police, which show that Louise Pugh’s clothes, work clothes, shoes and possessions were in found in 9 Kelvin Road, not 7 Kelvin Road. Louise Pugh was questioned on this fact. (Evidence can be provided).
In South Wales police statements, it was Louise Pugh who was able to describe accurately about the children’s exact clothes (even the make of trainers) that the children were wearing. No one else knew this information because they weren’t there daily to know this information. Louise knew all the routines of this little family because she helped wash and hang out their clothes regularly. Louise Pugh knew the exact timings of their routines because she was there daily. No one else’s name is down as knowing this detailed information about this family, only Louise.
Accusation about Louise Pugh being an unreliable witness and lying to the police.
Louise Pugh’s South Wales police statements were altered by known paedophile Christina Pugh, who was allowed to sit in and bully Louise Pugh in her police interviews by police officer Phil Rees and others. South Wales police did not follow police protocol or PACE 1984. Known serial paedophile Christina Pugh who was involved in cross borders serious organised crime including grooming gangs, fraud and selling babies on the black market, her fingerprints were found at 9 Kelvin Road on an oxybleach bottle (this oxybleach bottle should not have been there). (Evidenced by police statements).
There are fabricated statements by police such as Phil Noble (see above) and discredited police officer Chris Coutts (Mouncher Report 2017; witness statements from child abuse victims - Operation Goldfinch where 33 children’s homes were being investigated for paedophilia April 1999 - with Sir Anthony Burden and Wynne Phillips (involved in the Gurnos Fire /Tooze murders miscarriage of justices).
It is known that Chris Coutts and Phil Noble, along with paedophile Christina Pugh, fabricated police statements. These were not written by Louise Pugh and were used in the court room by the prosecution barrister Patrick Harrington to humiliate and discredit Louise Pugh’s testimony. This is because she would not change her statements. This is a direct contrast to unreliable and compromised friend of Christina Pugh, Gary Beynon. Instead, Louise Pugh spoke the truth and was not willing to compromise herself like many of Mandy’s so-called friends.
Allegation that Louise Pugh ‘threw a tantrum’ in the witness box.
Patrick Harrington QC asked child abuse victim Louise Pugh if she was having sexual relations with Mandy Power. This is a breach of court standards. Louise was threatened by police that if she did not change her statements they would expose the fact that she had been a victim of child abuse. Police used different terminology which by today’s standards are unacceptable. Louise did not give into police abuse and pressure.
In court, Louise was asked questions about fabricated statements which she did not write. She found out about this in her recent SARs. Recently, due to Louise Pugh’s complaint to the police regarding false statements being used in a court of law to discredit her, police officers (whose names were written on fabricated statements) were contacted and some officers admitted to the IOPC/ South Wales police standards that they had never met Louise Pugh.
Many of Louise’s police statements were written by paedophile Christina Pugh, as her name is on many of them, such as -
‘THE PUGHS STATE THAT THEY…’;
‘BOTH THE PUGHS…’
‘CHRISTINA PUGH AND LOUISE PUGH HAVE BEEN SPOKEN TO REGARDING…’
Again this is a breach of PACE 1984.
The police allowed known paedophile Christina Pugh to change and misrepresent Louise’s statements. Therefore, this is a breach of court standards. The Skye documentary Murder in the Valleys published Louise Pugh’s abuse in police interviews where when Louise was told to lie by her abusive mother, Louise Pugh refused to do so. Unbelievably, these police interviews were used to portray Louise as a liar when they did not publish the whole context. However, known paedophile Christina Pugh should never have been allowed into Louise’s interviews. A known paedophile is not an appropriate adult, especially when the police are aware that her fingerprints are all over the murder scene.
Breach of PACE 1984.
This is disrespectful to not only Louise but to Mandy, Doris, Katie and Emily. In the light of these FACTS, Louise Pugh’s reaction in court was quite reasonable given the unlawfulness and breaches in court protocol to deliberately discredit Louise Pugh.
This breach in court standards would never have happened in the English higher courts which align to the court of law and Gateway Advocacy rules.
Allegation about Louise Pugh being jealous of Alison Lewis.
This allegation came from police officer Stuart McKenzie who accused Louise Pugh of committing the murders when she was only 16 years old. Stuart McKenzie made the ridiculous allegation that Louise had killed Doris, Katie, Emily and Mandy because she was jealous of Alison Lewis. Stuart McKenzie is recorded on tape saying that South Wales police do not present all the evidence to defendants in murder trials.
As Louise stated, Stuart MacKenzie was bullying her to try to get her to admit to the murders which she did not do. This was before they focused their attention on David Morris. It has become evident that Louise Pugh was one of many who were accused of the murders, even though the police already had all the evidence to convict all the perpetrators of the joint enterprise murder.
Louise states that she was never jealous of Mandy being in a relationship with Alison Lewis, or Michael Power, Howard Florence, Robert Wachowski, Mark Mugford or taxi driver Rob White.
Louise said that Stuart McKenzie accusing her of being jealous of Alison Lewis was a ridiculous thing to accuse her of. He presented this as Louise’s motive for killing Doris, Katie, Emily and Mandy. Stuart McKenzie was abusing his police position to further damage the mind of a vulnerable sixteen year old. Louise had just lost the closest people in her world, in what can only be described as a brutal massacre. These people had been kind and protective towards her.
Therefore, having this false ridiculous allegation brought up again in 2025 by a member of Mandy’s family is abhorrent. This allegation was used to try to convict Louise of the murders of her friends Doris, Mandy, Katie and Emily when she was just 16 years old. To repeat this allegation about Louise 26 years later, just to silence Louise, this is quite a sick thing to do.
Debra Thomas’ comment about Louise Pugh being an ‘attention seeker’.
Debra Thomas repeated this comment to join in the bullying of Louise Pugh. It is a repeat from ex-Labour councillor Jayne Lewis who has a reputation in her locality of spreading misinformation about others in her village. Jayne Lewis even lied about why Louise joined Clydach council to stop Louise speaking. FACT - it was political group GWLAD that approached Louise Pugh to join Clydach Council as their candidate. The paperwork proves this. It is known that a malicious ex-councillor spread lies about Louise behind her back to GWLAD and as a result they withdrew their support forcing Louise to stand on her own as an independent without any backing or support.
Louise doesn’t post her personal business over social media and privately lives a quietly life in her house. She does not draw attention towards herself, so how can she possibly be an attention seeker when all Louise wants is to push for a public inquiry into child sexual abuse victims in her locality?
Debra Thomas’ name calling Louise Pugh a ‘drama queen’.
This again is Debra Thomas joining in with the bullying of Louise Pugh, as she repeats a comment she’s heard from Gary Beynon. Gary Beynon is already known as an unreliable witness and friend of known paedophile Christina Pugh. Evidence shows that Gary Beynon changed his police statement nine months after the murders to fit in with Christina Pugh’s agenda. Gary Beynon name calling Louise Pugh a ‘Drama Queen’ and accusing Louise of making money out of the murders. This is a direct deflection away from exactly who he is. Louise has not made money from anyone. These allegations are false. In fact, it is true to say that Louise Pugh and her female researcher has spent over 12K in seeking the truth about this case, travelling and speaking to connections all over the U.K., including Scotland, Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland.
Lynne Bevan / Nichola Rowlands of the David George Morris groups’ allegation that Louise is making her child abuse up for attention.
Louise Pugh’s does not speak on her own. Her information has been backed up by Sonny Wright of West Mercia police, Goldsmith University (who recognises her as a child abuse survivor who has lived through extreme abuse that not many people in their lives experience as an adult let alone as a child at the hands of her mother); Leeds Law School (criminal law regarding the legal protocols which were broken towards Louise Pugh); ECA (Ending Clergy Abuse), the Scottish Soldiers Organisation, University of Sheffield (examining the social poverty statistics in Swansea) and Irish research by COPING and research by the Australian commission standing up against child abuse.
Avoiding culpability
In 1999, South Wales police had enough evidence to convict ALL the joint enterprise perpetrators for their direct involvement in the murders. However, two police officers while under investigation, Stuart and Stephen Lewis brought information about the criminality / misconduct of 40 South Wales police officers (evidenced by Michael Mansfield QC).
Who were these 40 corrupt police officers?
What information did Stephen and Stuart Lewis have on them?
What negotiations took place?
It is in the public interest to know exactly who they are.
Millions of public money was wasted on protecting corruption or corrupt police officers within the police force. Police officers were paid overtime to set innocent people up. We know of at least five different people who were accused of the murders, with the risk of fabricated evidence being used against them.
Stephen and Stuart Lewis were paid two million in compensation. Louise was one of many innocent people who was wrongly accused of the murders and South Wales police tried to frame her. She’s still waiting for her compensation for institution corruption and systematic abuse!
At the time, names under scrutiny were Sir Anthony Burden (Operation Goldfinch / the sacking of a select heads of service connected to paedophilia across 33 children’s residential homes in the M4 corridor), Wynne Phillips (MOJO document, Gurnos Fire and Tooze, Operation Goldfinch), Phil Jones (imprisoned after the murders for corruption), Chris Coutts (Mouncher Report 2017; CCRC 2018; R v Morris [2002; 2005; 2006; 2007].
Were any of these names on Stuart and Stephen’s ‘negotiations’ list?
Would this give them public interest immunity status, putting them both in the same category as police informers? Just like known paedophile and serial abuser, Christina Pugh?
In 2003, J.B. Adsley’s response to Paddy Hill’s Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (MOJO) document as referred to in Michael O’Brien’s ‘Wrongfully Imprisoned’ tour, points to the misconduct of over 40 South Wales police officers.
Were these corrupt police officers on the Lewises’ list?
The allegation that Louise Pugh left David Morris languishing in prison for over 22 years.
Louise Pugh had the courage to speak up for David Morris by telling the truth. She did not change her police statements, despite being bullied, pressured and accused of the murders herself.
The fact is clear, David Morris and his defence did not recognise the value of Louise Pugh. If David Morris’ defence team had recognised the value of Louise Pugh’s testimony, then they would have called her in as a defence witness. This never happened.
Louise Pugh was called as a prosecution witness. The prosecution called her as a witness with the sole purpose of destroying her testimony and discrediting her with falsified documents. Because of this deliberate public humiliation, innocent Louise Pugh has been bullied and vilified for decades by both sides. Louise Pugh has been the scapegoat target of both those who claim David Morris is guilty and those who claim he is innocent. This deliberate psychological strategy is called ‘divide and rule’. What has been done to Louise is abhorrent.
Years before David Morris died in prison in 2021, Louise Pugh located Doris Dawson’s first death certificate and Doris’ second death certificate with the changed day of death from the 26th to the 27th.
Louise Pugh went over and above to find out the truth to obtain justice.
Louise gave this information to Mr.,A. Rees, who sent these death certificates on to David Morris while he was alive and well in Long Lartin Prison. These death certificates proved David Morris’ innocence beyond all shadow of doubt. This broke the men’s reau / actus reus of the case. Shortly afterwards, David Morris’ sister contacted Mr. A.Rees via her works email and told A.Rees to stop assisting David Morris. Fact! (Evidenced by email evidence)
The accusation that Louise Pugh is responsible for leaving David Morris rot languishing in prison for over 22 years is absolutely not true.
Louise was David Morris’ champion. She spoke in his defence, even when her worth and value was not recognised by his defence team.
Louise has been victimised and mistreated by many, even those closest to David Morris. They continue to try to bully Louise into silence. Not only did Debra Morris stop Mr. A.Rees in his tracks when he was pursuing justice for David Morris, when he was still alive. But in 2025, David Morris’ sister threatened to campaign to stop Louise Pugh speaking about all her evidence and lived experience, including living through the horrors of the Clydach murders for lessons to be learned.
Why threaten to actively campaign to stop Louise speaking about her knowledge and lived-experience when Louise had spoken up in defence of her own brother while others remained silent?
Allegations by Kelly Winn.
Kelly Winn engaged in online abuse towards Louise Pugh over many different social media platforms (Facebook, email and a third party). The content of her communication was abusive slurs, name-calling and threats. Kelly Winn’s communication contains no intellectual substance to critically analyse. After being informed about Louise Pugh being a primary victim (experienced the severe violence first-hand) and a secondary victim (her own friends and family members were murdered/victims of manslaughter), Kelly Winn reported Louise to the benefits office to try to stop her benefits and tried her best to stop her speaking about her abuse. Michael O’Brien read her vile comments and suggested reporting her for breaking the Malicious Communication Act.
Violence against women and children is everyone’s business.
All victims are deserving of respect, including Louise Pugh who is a female victim of extreme violence. Many of her own family members have been brutally mistreated / died prematurely because of her female perpetrator mother. Yet people believe it is still acceptable to mistreat and bully Louise Pugh.
People seem to forget that Louise Pugh stood by Mandy Power when many of her friends and family stopped talking to her. Louise remained a loyal, faithful friend.
Louise Pugh was also abused in court for defending David Morris. Yet, instead of thankfulness and being grateful to Louise for her courage, his sister on his Facebook site thinks it is acceptable to lead others encouraging online abuse towards Louise Pugh.
Wales is supposed to be a nation of sanctuary.
Wales is not a sanctuary but it has been a place of abuse for Louise Pugh. Wales and the Labour government have failed female victims of extreme violence. They have been badly let down by the police and the communities that they are a part of.
Many of the people in the communities of Swansea have been bystanders who have willingly joined in with the abuse towards Louise.
Accountability and transparency
We are happy to meet with anyone who wants to see the evidence for themselves. Spreading misinformation is damaging, as it causes fear in the minds of the abused and the female victims of extreme violence who we’ve been supporting for years. Many are already suicide risks and living in fear for their lives.
Legality
Louise is classed as both a primary victim (suffered first hand) and a secondary victim of extreme violence (many of her close friends and family members have been victims of murder/manslaughter). Therefore, the truth needs to come out because the continuous persistent bullying of Louise Pugh is unlawful (Human Rights Act 1998; Equality Act 2010). This bullying has to stop. 🛑