Petition updateJoint Congressional Hearings & DOJ Investigation of Microwave Assaults on U​.​S. Citizens2 WEBINARS - Wednesday, Dec 15, 2021 - REGISTER for both 1PM & 3PM Eastern Time
Helena CsorbaPittsburgh, PA, United States
Dec 14, 2021

FDA Standards for Wireless Radiation - WEBINAR - Wednesday, December 15th, 2021 at 1pm Eastern Time, 10 am Pacific

https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcldeioqDgsEtTJIHYkccBxBQ3-1i2zJrYK

REGISTER =>Registration is required – This webinar is free and open to lawyers, medical and public health professionals and the general public.

The New Technologies Forum webinars are jointly sponsored by Americans for Responsible Technology and the Broadband International Legal Action Network – ART - Americans for Responsible Technology <info@americansforresponsibletech.org>;

The New Technologies Forum presents: Petitioning the FDA About Wireless Radiation

Presenters:

1. Doug Wood, Founder of Americans for Responsible Technology: “What is a Responsible Public Policy for RF/EMF Emitting Devices and Human/Environment Exposure?”

2. Dr. David Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment: “Why Does the FDA Continue to Deny the Effects of RF Radiation?”

3. Julian Gresser, Of Counsel, Swankin & Turner, Co-Founder BroadBand International Legal Action Network (BBILAN): “The Public Pays Principle in Historic and Comparative Perspective”

4. James S. Turner, Co-Founder, Swankin & Turner: “The FDA Case and the Protection of the Consumer”

5. Joseph M. Sandri, Co-Founder, The BALANCE GROUP, President National Spectrum Management Association: “Why Effective Protocols and Instruments to Measure Biological Interference Are Decisive?”

The FDA has the authority and responsibility to protect public health. So where are the FDA standards for exposure?

Ever wonder how one agency of the U. S. government can conduct a $30 million dollar study that proves that exposure to non-thermal RF radiation causes cancer in lab animals, while another agency holds on to exposure guidelines developed by engineers in the 1980s that only consider thermal impacts?

We did too.

The FCC claims it gets advice from the FDA, so we looked to see what kind of standards the FDA was using to assess the adequacy of FCC's exposure guidelines to protect public health. It turns out the FDA doesn't actually have any science-based standards for exposure to the wireless devices and infrastructure that are permeating every corner of our lives.

===================

Don’t confuse the WEBINAR also held Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 3PM Eastern Time presented by Attorney Dafna Tachover, that you also have to register for: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN__KjdVphbSUKuxd1uFZ_6wQ  on OTARD case and Q&A, in which attorneys Scott McCollough and Dafna Tachover led the hearing and the case.

https://www.change.org/p/joe-biden-president-of-the-united-states-of-america-joint-congressional-hearings-doj-investigation-of-microwave-assaults-on-u-s-citizens/u/29957928

===================

$10 donation (or as much as you can afford) is the best thing you can do, so that we can retain an attorney to represent us, to be recognized and to validate our plight, to escape this horrific pulsed, directed RF DEW energy weapon: https://www.gofundme.com/f/legal-fund-investigate-pulsed-microwave-rf

posted by Helena Csorba rfhurtslife@gmail.com

Copy link
WhatsApp
Facebook
Nextdoor
Email
X