
Investigate insourcing security services in Potchefstroom
The Issue
I have been on the front lines as a security worker at a government institution, feeling firsthand the uncertainty and instability that come with outsourced security services. Each time a contract ends, there's a palpable fear among my colleagues and me concerning payment delays, potential loss of employment, and the precariousness of our benefits. This is a reality not just for me, but for countless others who are pivotal in maintaining safety and order at government facilities.
This is why I am urging the government to investigate and earnestly reconsider insourcing security services at government institutions and public-sector facilities in Potchefstroom. Given that security is not just about protection but also about stability for those who provide it, it’s crucial to explore whether insourced security services would provide more reliability, fairer employment conditions, and better service delivery.
The questions we must consider are fundamental. How do the financial implications of insourcing compare to outsourcing? Will insourced positions lead to greater job security and satisfaction for security personnel? Can insourced teams deliver more consistent and personalized service? I believe the government should address these questions with data-driven analysis while involving security workers, affected employees, and the general public in this conversation.
Consider the economic benefits of insourced services. When security services are insourced, the government has direct control over the service standards and employment conditions, which could minimize turnover and align security protocols with institutional goals. This not only protects the workforce but potentially enhances the safety and efficiency of service delivery. Furthermore, retaining skilled workers reduces training costs and enhances operational consistency.
A comprehensive review that involves input from all stakeholders, including security personnel and the public, will ensure a balanced and fair decision-making process. It is critical for the government to weigh these considerations conscientiously and determine the best course of action for both security staff and public facilities in Potchefstroom.
I urge you to sign this petition to support the call for a thorough investigation into insourcing security services. Together, we can make a difference in ensuring stability and fair treatment for those safeguarding our community’s essential institutions.

2
The Issue
I have been on the front lines as a security worker at a government institution, feeling firsthand the uncertainty and instability that come with outsourced security services. Each time a contract ends, there's a palpable fear among my colleagues and me concerning payment delays, potential loss of employment, and the precariousness of our benefits. This is a reality not just for me, but for countless others who are pivotal in maintaining safety and order at government facilities.
This is why I am urging the government to investigate and earnestly reconsider insourcing security services at government institutions and public-sector facilities in Potchefstroom. Given that security is not just about protection but also about stability for those who provide it, it’s crucial to explore whether insourced security services would provide more reliability, fairer employment conditions, and better service delivery.
The questions we must consider are fundamental. How do the financial implications of insourcing compare to outsourcing? Will insourced positions lead to greater job security and satisfaction for security personnel? Can insourced teams deliver more consistent and personalized service? I believe the government should address these questions with data-driven analysis while involving security workers, affected employees, and the general public in this conversation.
Consider the economic benefits of insourced services. When security services are insourced, the government has direct control over the service standards and employment conditions, which could minimize turnover and align security protocols with institutional goals. This not only protects the workforce but potentially enhances the safety and efficiency of service delivery. Furthermore, retaining skilled workers reduces training costs and enhances operational consistency.
A comprehensive review that involves input from all stakeholders, including security personnel and the public, will ensure a balanced and fair decision-making process. It is critical for the government to weigh these considerations conscientiously and determine the best course of action for both security staff and public facilities in Potchefstroom.
I urge you to sign this petition to support the call for a thorough investigation into insourcing security services. Together, we can make a difference in ensuring stability and fair treatment for those safeguarding our community’s essential institutions.

The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 25 September 2026