IN OUR LONG JOURNEY IN PURSUIT OF JUSTICE....
MY DEAR FRIENDS,
"AGITATION - LITIGATION - NEGOTIATION "
THE THREE GUIDING BAISIC PRINCIPLES ON WHICH ANY TRADE UNION WORTH IT'S NAME SHOULD FUNCTION.
PREAMBLE:
ANTICIDENTS LEADING TO THE RESTORATION OF OROP FOR THE DEFENCE PERSONNEL
EVEN, THE RETIRED DEFENCE PERSONNEL HAD TO RESORT TO SEVERE DIRECT PROTEST ACTION PROGRAMMES LIKE ROAD/RAIL -ROKO, FAST-UNTO-DEATH. EVEN THOSE WARRIORS WHO LOST THEIR LIMBS IN WAR ALSO DISPLAYED THEIR VEHEMENT PROTEST COMING ON TO THE STREETS IN THEIR WHEEL-CHARES!!!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KwYMKDUT5bwsNZXagxDa3Wk60jHHfwl8/view?usp=drivesdk
TAKING CUE FROM OUR ABOVE WARRIORS, OUR RETIREE BRETHERN IN RBI HAD ALSO SUCCEEDED IN THE RESTORATION OF PENSION UPDATION BY UTILISING ALL THE ABOVE THREE WEAPONS SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE ACTIVE COOPRATION OF THEIR WORKING ORGANISATIONS.
THE ARE INDEED OUR TORCH-BEARERS!
WHEREAS IN TOTAL CONTRAST, OUR WORKING UNIONS "DREW THEIR COLD FEET" TOWARDS RETIREES ISSUE OF PENSION UPDATION, HAVING BEEN SIGNED THE NOTORIOUS MAGNACARTA IN THE FORM OF RECORD NOTE WITH THE IBA.
BY GOING ONE MORE STEP AHEAD, THEY EVEN SCUTTLED OUR LEGAL BATTLE IN OUR 100% DA ISSUE WHERE THE AIBRF LEADERSHIP PLAYED THE ROLE OF "SHIKHANDI" AN OUR EPIC MAHA BHARATHA
UNDER THE CIRMSTANCES, LEGAL BATTLES HAS BEEN INEVITABLLY THRUST IN US.
WHAT ALL THE MONETARY BENEFITS WE ACCRUED SOFAR ARE THROUGH COURTS' INTERVENTION ONLY AND NOTHING THROUGH NEGOTIONS TILLVDATE. - HISTORY VOUCH SAFE THIS FACT.
TO SITE AS AN EXAMPLE, I ANNEX THE FOLLOWING NEWS ITEM FOR YOUR BETTER UNDERSTANDING -A NEWS ITEM ON JUSTICE BV NAGARATHNA - (HON'BLE SUPREME COURT SITTING JUDGE)
✴️QUOTE✴️
Demonetisation decision gets Supreme Court seal of approval
While Justices S Abdul Nazeer, B R Gavai, A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian upheld the Government's move, Justice B V Nagarathna disagreed with the “reasoning and conclusions” in the majority judgment.
The daughter of Justice E S Venkataramiah, who was Chief Justice of India for around six months in 1989, Justice Nagarathna began her practice in Bengaluru. (File)
✴️UNQUOTE✴️
FRIENDS,
THE ABOVE REMINDS ME OF OUR EMINENT JURUSTS IN THE PAST. THE FILLOWING INCIDENTS ARE DIRECTLY RELATED & WORTH MENTIONING:
BY VIRTUE OF HER FLAW-LESS & FORTHRIGHT EXPRESSION, JUSTICE BV NAGARATHNA GARU IS IN LINE IN SENIORITY, TO BE THE FIRST LADY TO BECOME THE CHIEF JUSITICE OF INDIA IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
LET US GO TO FLASH BACK......
(In terms of the SC Judgment dated 13 02 2018 in Civil Appeals # 1892-1912 in SLP(c):023777 - 023797 of Syndicate Bank Vs. D. Srinivasa Murti Connected matter to CA:5525/2012)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19mzqNZb6bqbgfUSOKg5VOVLgWlOquZiV/view?usp=drivesdk
IN FACT, JUSTICE VIKRAMJITSEN THE THEN CJI. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ALONG WITH JUSTICE BV NAGARATHNAMMA HAD UPHELD OUR PRAYERS AS AGGRIEVED BY THE ANOMALIES WHILE FIXING BASIC PENSION AND IT'S CONSEQUENTIAL RAMIFICATIONS, WHEREIN I FILED MY WP:No. 41751/2001 ON 24 09 2001 IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THE NOTABLE OBSERVATION MADE BY THE BENCH ( JUSTICE. VIKRAMJIT SEN & JUSITICE B V NAGARATNMMA IS ANNEXED HERE:
✴️QUOTE✴️
"..... WE MENTION THIS FOR THE REASON THAT IT APPEARS TO US THAT THE EXTREMELY SCARCE TIME OF THE COURT AS WELL AS THE BANK’S RESOURCES HAVE BEEN AVOIDABLY AND UNNECESSARILY EXPENDED ON AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY..........."
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19mzqNZb6bqbgfUSOKg5VOVLgWlOquZiV/view?usp=drivesdk
✴️UNQUOTE✴️
THE ABOVE IS IN THE FAMOUS 1616-1684 DA CASE (SEVENTEEN -YEAR - OLD- BETWEEN 2001 & 2018) WHICH WAS ALSO UPHELD BY THE SUPREME COURT ON 13 02 2018 WHERE BY WE GOT THE BENIFIT OF 5-YEAR NOTIONAL SERVICE, BESIDES REFIXATION OF BASIC PENTION & COMMUTATION ARREARS AS PER THE PENSION REGULATIONS TOGETHER WITH INTEREST THEREON. MANY OF OUR PRE-2002 RETUREES HAVE BEEN BENIFITED OUT OF THIS HISTORICAL JUDGMENT--
AN INDELIBLE HISTORICAL TRUTH OF YESTER YEARS.
NOTWITHSTANDING THE ABOVE....
IN THE PRESENT CONTEXT, WE HAVE GOT TO PURSUE THE MOTION HEARING IN THE ONGOING CASE FILED BY LATE MC SINGLA& Ors TOWARDS IT'S LOGICAL CONCLUSION.
AT THIS JUNCTURE I ONLY APPEAL TO ONE AND ALL TO DESIST FROM FILING FURTHER IMPLEADMENTS AS IT WOULD BE COUNTER- PRIDUCTIVE TO FURTHER DELAY THE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
I REPEAT... LET THERE BE NO MORE IMPLEADMENTS AS WE HAVE LOST PRECIOUS TIME ALREADY.
PLEASE LISTEN TO MY AUDIO LINK FOR MORE CLARITY IN THIS REGARD
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19cjdVEDGy-bWfRFpjfcGkt_ZltD5OI5j/view?usp=drivesdk
SUPREME COURT
Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).2974/2022
ALL KERALA BANK RETIREES FORUM (AKBRF) & ORS. Petitioner(s) - Versus -
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION)
Date : 02-01-2023
This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. C. K. Sasi, AOR
Mr. Abdulla Naseeh V T, Adv.
Ms. Meena K Poulose, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
"ISSUE NOTICE"
✴️UNQUITE ✴️