WHETHER CLASSIFICATION OF PENSIONERS BASED ON CUT -OFF DATE VIOLATES ARTICLE #14? -
MY DEAR FRIENDS,
WHETHER CLASSIFICATION OF PENSIONERS BASED ON CUT -OFF DATE VIOLATES ARTICLE #14? - SUPREME COURT'S TWO-JUDGE BENCH REFERS TO LARGER BENCH (21 02 2022)
LET US HOPEFULLY LOOK FORWARD TO THE POSITIVE RESPONSE FROM THE LARGER BENCH SO THAT, WE CAN HAVE STRONG GROUNDS TO RE OPEN OUR 100% DA CASE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASIONS:
ADVERTING TO THE ABOVE, I MAKE A REFERENCE TO OUR 100% DA NEUTRILIZATION CASE # 5252 - 5255 TO THE PRE - 2002 RETIREES WHICH WE LOST OWING TO THE MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS BY IBA, BESIDES THE ACT OF SABOTAGE BY THE AIBRF LEADERSHP WHICH YOU ARE ALL QUITE AWARE OF
WE HAVE LOST EVEN AT THE CURATIVE STAGE DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE GOT AS MANY AS THREE JUDGMENTS IN THE HIGH COURTS OF MADRAS & KOLKOTTA IN OUR FAVOUR AS AGAINST THE ONLY ONE WHICH IS GLARINGLY UPHELD AS DETAILED OUT HERE UNDER:
YOU ARE ALSO AWARE OF THE CONTRADICTING STANCES TAKEN BY THE SUPREME COURT WITHIN A SHORT SPAN OF JUST THREE MONTHS OF DELEVERING IT'S OWN VERDICT IN FAVOUR OF THE RETIREES IN CASE #5525 ( 1616 - 1684 DA CASE) ON 13 02 2018.
( Referring to the above, I already made an effort to bring to the notice of all the legal luminaries as to my effort to invite the kind attention of His Lordship- Chief Justice of India to the CONTRADICTING STANCES TAKEN BY THE APEX JUDICIARY while disposing of the TWO IDENTICAL CASES RELATED TO THE BANK RETIREES WITHIN A VERY SHORT SPAN OF JUST 3 MONTHS GAP - Ie.13th. February, 2018* and 16th. May, 2018** (Just 3 months gap and that too, after having been kept the judgment reserved for pronouncement for over 10 long months! - I explained in detail as to the antecedents that paved way to this glaring injustice on the part of the Apex Court which need to be made as a focal debating point among the judicial circles
throughout.)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fkHK8zHZE-jCr8N8DJW8OGLkpstTOtg1/view?usp=drivesdk
IN THIS CONNECTION, I INVITE YOUR SPECIFIC ATTENTION TO THE VALID POINTS RAISED BY OUR LEARNED FRIEND, SRI KATARI SATYA NARAYANA GARU, INDIAN BANK RETIREE, VIJAYAWADA EXPLAINING THE "DOCTRINE OF PERINCURIUM"
( Click the link for the details_)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17TM4oAqyBwsqlZNbB49ah-pJ1Kyn_bmN/view?usp=drivesdk
THUS, I AM OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT WE CAN CONFIDENTLY MAKE AN EFFORT TO CONTEST THE EARLIER JUDGMENT OF THE APEX COURT IN CA Nos.5252 - 5255
Further, I also append here the observations & suggestion made by our another learned friend - sri N Sankara Subramanyam of Indian Bank, Erode.
QUOTE
**********************
Friends
The issue of date of retirement as Cut-off date for extending a benefit was considered by a two judge bench of the Supreme Court recently (Order copy enclosed).
The matter has been referred to a three judge bench. We may wait for the decision of the three judge bench and proceed further after the decision. The decision of the three judge bench will strengthen our case.
We have one more avenue to approach the Supreme Court. The decision in CA Nos.5252 - 5255 will not bind us as the petitioners did not act bona fide .
Here we need not wait for the decision of the three judge bench.
Whatever may be the course we adopt, Pensioners from New Delhi have to take the responsibility of filing the case, engaging a leading Advocate etc. Pensioners also have to contribute financially.
Members may express their opinion on the foregoing so that the decision to proceed further or not may be arrived at.
Regards
N. Sankara Subramanian
+91 9443040709
***********************
UNQUOTE
| यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः ||
IS THE ULTIMATE ......
I remain – Yours ,
దేవులపల్లి శ్రీనివాస మూర్తి
DEVULAPALLI SRINIVASA MURTI
Flat # 102 "Sai Kunj "
Lakshminarasimhapuram Colony ,
Hasthinapuram North - Hydearbad
MARCH 20, 2022