Conflict of Interest: Judicial Officers vs Attorneys
How can an attorney coincidentally use Social Media to influence the outcome of a pending Domestic Violence matter o/b of a minor that was due for trial, the day before?
This matter has been pending since 2018. It moved from one Court to another. Now, the JO has aborted trial and recused herself. Citing too much anomaly and similar facts in a Custody matter. This matter will be placed in another JO or disappear.
WHO IS REALLY SEEKING CHILDREN'S INTERESTS HERE?
Remember, Carimbocas vs Carimbocas?
SECTION 44 OF THE FAMILY LAW ACT:
All Masters have the jurisdiction to hear all cases relating to children. The main situation that warrants any transfer is whereby during the Magisterial Proceedings the child is made a WARD OF THE COURT.
How can an attorney who has a sexual relationship with her client be allowed to represent him?
Why would an ex gf/attorney disclose evidence from a pending Custody Matter (her ex bf is the Applicant) on Social Media and cite bias whereby the dates of Evidence are totally different?
How can attorneys representing the minor assigned in 2016 from the Solicitor's General Office were not aware know that the Applicant and one of his attorney(who applied and was granted to have the minor become a WARD OF THE COURT in 2015) were in a relationship while representing him from 2015 to 2021?
How is it that the Child Advocates, Solicitor's General office did not know that the said attorney obtained a Restraining Order against her client/ex boyfriend?
However, it is clear that attorneys abuse Section 46 of the FLA by duplicating proceedings. This allows parents abuse their parental rights for no other reason than to punish the other parent.
Just as judges and magistrates tell parents to choose their partners wisely, then inform the Lawyers to do the same as well.
This is very distasteful, unethical, immoral and degrading within the Camp of the Family Court and is now labelled as " Keeping Up with the Judiciary".