Expand the College Football Playoff From 12 to 16 Teams
The Issue
College football needs a fairer playoff, not an oversized one.
The College Football Playoff (CFP) is considering expanding beyond its current 12-team format, with discussions involving a possible 24-team playoff.
While more teams deserve a chance to compete for a national championship, jumping straight from 12 to 24 teams is too much, too soon.
We urge CFP leaders, conference commissioners, and ESPN to adopt a 16-team playoff with 7 automatic bids and 9 at-large bids instead.
A 16-team format would create more championship opportunities while protecting student-athletes, conference championships, and the importance of the regular season.
Why Not 24 Teams?
A 24-team playoff could create several serious problems:
- More injuries and fatigue: Some teams could play up to five playoff games, increasing physical demands on student-athletes.
- Less meaningful regular-season games: Allowing twice as many teams into the playoff could reduce the importance of regular-season victories and losses.
- Threats to conference championships: Making room for a larger playoff could put traditional conference title games at risk.
- Higher costs for fans: Additional postseason rounds could mean more travel, tickets, and hotel expenses.
- Too much expansion too quickly: More playoff games do not necessarily mean better competition or better television ratings.
College football should protect its players, traditions, and competitive excitement rather than expand simply to generate more revenue.
Why 16 Teams Is the Better Choice
A 16-team playoff offers a reasonable compromise between fairness, competition, and tradition.
Our proposed format includes:
- 7 automatic bids: Four for the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, and SEC champions, plus three for the highest-ranked remaining conference champions.
- 9 at-large bids: Giving deserving teams from any conference, including independents, an opportunity to qualify.
- 4 playoff rounds: A straightforward bracket without adding a fifth round.
- Campus-hosted first-round games: Rewarding higher-ranked teams and creating exciting postseason atmospheres.
- Major bowl traditions preserved: Keeping established bowl games involved in the championship.
This approach would give more schools a realistic path to the national championship without doubling the playoff field.
Why College Football Should Choose 16 Teams First
A 16-team playoff would create more championship opportunities without expanding too aggressively.
Here's what makes it a better compromise:
- Fewer playoff games: 15 total games instead of 23 in a 24-team format.
- Fairer access: Seven automatic bids would give more conference champions a guaranteed opportunity.
- Meaningful regular season: Higher-ranked teams would earn home-field advantage in the first round.
- Protect conference championships: Keep important conference traditions rather than removing them to accommodate a larger playoff.
- Responsible growth: Give the 16-team format at least three seasons to prove itself before considering further expansion.
We recognize that a 24-team playoff could generate additional revenue and give more schools a chance to participate. However, expansion should balance financial opportunities with fair competition, student-athlete welfare, and the interests of fans.
Sixteen teams offer the CFP a chance to grow responsibly without rushing into a much larger tournament.
Our Message to CFP Leadership
We ask the College Football Playoff to:
- Choose 16 teams instead of 24 as the next step in expansion.
- Adopt a balanced 7 automatic bids + 9 at-large bids format.
- Protect student-athlete health, regular-season importance, and conference championships.
- Evaluate the results of a 16-team playoff before considering additional expansion.
The goal should be a better playoff, not simply a bigger one.
A 16-team format creates more opportunity while protecting the competition and traditions that make college football special.
Help Protect the Future of College Football!
With CFP leaders discussing a possible 24-team playoff beginning in 2027, now is the time for fans to speak up.
We support expansion, but believe 16 teams would offer a better balance of opportunity, competition, player welfare, and tradition.
Sign and share this petition to encourage CFP leaders to consider 16 teams before finalizing a 24-team format.
16 Teams. More Opportunity. Better Balance.
4
The Issue
College football needs a fairer playoff, not an oversized one.
The College Football Playoff (CFP) is considering expanding beyond its current 12-team format, with discussions involving a possible 24-team playoff.
While more teams deserve a chance to compete for a national championship, jumping straight from 12 to 24 teams is too much, too soon.
We urge CFP leaders, conference commissioners, and ESPN to adopt a 16-team playoff with 7 automatic bids and 9 at-large bids instead.
A 16-team format would create more championship opportunities while protecting student-athletes, conference championships, and the importance of the regular season.
Why Not 24 Teams?
A 24-team playoff could create several serious problems:
- More injuries and fatigue: Some teams could play up to five playoff games, increasing physical demands on student-athletes.
- Less meaningful regular-season games: Allowing twice as many teams into the playoff could reduce the importance of regular-season victories and losses.
- Threats to conference championships: Making room for a larger playoff could put traditional conference title games at risk.
- Higher costs for fans: Additional postseason rounds could mean more travel, tickets, and hotel expenses.
- Too much expansion too quickly: More playoff games do not necessarily mean better competition or better television ratings.
College football should protect its players, traditions, and competitive excitement rather than expand simply to generate more revenue.
Why 16 Teams Is the Better Choice
A 16-team playoff offers a reasonable compromise between fairness, competition, and tradition.
Our proposed format includes:
- 7 automatic bids: Four for the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, and SEC champions, plus three for the highest-ranked remaining conference champions.
- 9 at-large bids: Giving deserving teams from any conference, including independents, an opportunity to qualify.
- 4 playoff rounds: A straightforward bracket without adding a fifth round.
- Campus-hosted first-round games: Rewarding higher-ranked teams and creating exciting postseason atmospheres.
- Major bowl traditions preserved: Keeping established bowl games involved in the championship.
This approach would give more schools a realistic path to the national championship without doubling the playoff field.
Why College Football Should Choose 16 Teams First
A 16-team playoff would create more championship opportunities without expanding too aggressively.
Here's what makes it a better compromise:
- Fewer playoff games: 15 total games instead of 23 in a 24-team format.
- Fairer access: Seven automatic bids would give more conference champions a guaranteed opportunity.
- Meaningful regular season: Higher-ranked teams would earn home-field advantage in the first round.
- Protect conference championships: Keep important conference traditions rather than removing them to accommodate a larger playoff.
- Responsible growth: Give the 16-team format at least three seasons to prove itself before considering further expansion.
We recognize that a 24-team playoff could generate additional revenue and give more schools a chance to participate. However, expansion should balance financial opportunities with fair competition, student-athlete welfare, and the interests of fans.
Sixteen teams offer the CFP a chance to grow responsibly without rushing into a much larger tournament.
Our Message to CFP Leadership
We ask the College Football Playoff to:
- Choose 16 teams instead of 24 as the next step in expansion.
- Adopt a balanced 7 automatic bids + 9 at-large bids format.
- Protect student-athlete health, regular-season importance, and conference championships.
- Evaluate the results of a 16-team playoff before considering additional expansion.
The goal should be a better playoff, not simply a bigger one.
A 16-team format creates more opportunity while protecting the competition and traditions that make college football special.
Help Protect the Future of College Football!
With CFP leaders discussing a possible 24-team playoff beginning in 2027, now is the time for fans to speak up.
We support expansion, but believe 16 teams would offer a better balance of opportunity, competition, player welfare, and tradition.
Sign and share this petition to encourage CFP leaders to consider 16 teams before finalizing a 24-team format.
16 Teams. More Opportunity. Better Balance.
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on October 15, 2026