Dear Supporters, Tomorrow, Neelu Berry (just google her name or go to http://hampsteadchristchurch.com/neelu as she was arrested together with the publisher of that site) will have to be in Court 2 at Blackfriars Court at 10.30. I published six 'witness statements' relating to her case in April 2015 on https://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/04/10/what-if-fatherpaul-took-a-selfie-to-prove-the-whistleblowerkids-wrong-his-witness-statement-as-part-of-neelus-arrest. On 11 January 2016 I got accused of having 'conspired / agreed' with Neelu to intimidate 'witnesses' who actually are abusers named by the then 8- and 9-year-old children. However, Police used these 'witnesses' to bring us supporters of Children's Rights behind bars. In fact, on the occasion of one hearing in Blackfriars, the mother of the Enfield 6 recognised Police who had come to support us. Why would Police who took her children be interested in how our hearing went??? Here's the complete report: https://mckenzies4fairness.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/16-06-22-london-authorities-harming-children1.pdf And here's the Executive Summary: Case A: Two Children Accuse their Father of being the Leader of a ‘Cult’ 1) In summer 2014, two children aged 9 and 8 went on holiday with their mother. Away from home, they managed to tell her that their father had been abusing them and other children in their school and the associated church as leader of a ‘cult’. 2) Out of concern for the other children, the mother took them as witnesses to Barnet Police station where they were interviewed. Six days later they were re-interviewed and this time they were removed from their mother with whom they had lived all their lives. 3) After another six days they gave a ‘retraction’ interview found by a professional analyst to be extremely flawed, yet the case was closed with ‘crime not confirmed’. 4) Judge Vera Mayer transferred the case from Barnet Family Court to the High Court, where Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley ruled on 19 March 2015 that the children’s testimonies were “in the realms of fantasy”, the police interviews less than professional and that the estimated 4 million viewers of their videos would have sexual interests. 5) The mother fled for fear of imprisonment by a secret family court; the children remain in care and have regular contact with their father. 6) Internet supporters are being slandered and defamed and three have been arrested and charged. One has returned to the US. Two others are currently on trial. 7) Two submissions regarding the case have been made to the EU Petitions Committee. Case B: Six Children are Set against their Mother by their Father 1) In summer 2014, a British mother of six children filed for divorce proceedings. 2) Prompted by their Greek Cypriot father, the children made hoax-calls to the Police who promptly arrested the mother and forced her to leave the home, leaving father to look after the children. 3) The children were disturbed in father’s care and eventually the mother was permitted to return home and resume care of them. Then in February 2015 father was arrested for violence and banned from the home, nevertheless the police took the children into care. Following protracted and ‘skewed’ family court proceedings and an abortive attempt by the mother to appeal, four of the children are to be sent to ‘Special Guardianship’ in Cyprus and two are to be fostered or adopted in UK. Systemic Patterns of Child Removal by Local Authorities Having observed scores of cases as the Association of McKenzie Friends, we have identified certain patterns and have communicated these to the EU Petitions Committee: a. Local Authorities are expected to meet adoption targets and are rewarded for removing children; b. As former MP John Hemming has claimed and Social Workers confirmed in their evidence to the MEPs who came for a ‘fact-finding visit’ in November 2015, removing children is UK ‘policy’; c. Children are NOT heard and are regularly given to the abusive parent, as in the above case, first to the father, then to strangers. THANK YOU for being part of the internet community that was labelled "evil and / or foolish" by Mrs Justice Anna Pauffley. In her judgement after 'fact-finding' in her secret family court - without the mother or her representative - she said that the children were "in the realms of fantasy." https://whistleblowerkids.uk/the-judgement-19-03-15/ She happened to have been on duty when the mother of the Enfield 6 made an emergency application for four of her children NOT to be deported from the UK. Hence she called the mother but put the phone down when she heard the word 'corruption'. Blessed be the internet and the rising importance of 'e-reputation'! Sabine and Belinda PS. The video was recorded when we were in Brussels on Referendum Day. The full seminar is on https://mcknews.com/2016/06/26/children-not-for-sale-the-black-hole-of-our-culture-eu-eu-coe-mojgovuk-brexit/ More interviews with MEPs will soon follow on https://mcknews.com/