The scans one at a time: 1.. This is my appeal victory in CUIAB Case A0-265448 from 10/20/2011 that refuted the Department of Labor and California EDD's EUC08 implementation (and every other state's too). I challenged the "Multiple EUC Claim Error" that forced me to be paid from an older and lesser remaining EUC08 account balance from an older benefit year that should have been terminated and ignored. I lost $2786 dollars due to the EUC08 implementation error by the Federal Department of Labor (published in UiPL 23-08 Change 1 Q&A #7 on August 15, 2008). This mistake also caused me to fail the HR4213/Part Time Penalty "fix" from Public Law 111-205, because the "older benefit year" was before the eligibility date. My appeal victory fixed this problem and I was paid based on the MOST RECENT BENEFIT YEAR while ALL older ones were ignored (20 CFR 615.5(2))........ http://s1359.beta.photobucket.com/user/corazonroto512/library/CUIAB%20Case%20A0265448%20Victory%20on%20October%2020%202011